Judge Imposes Gag On Trump In Manhattan Criminal Trial.

[Rigby5]

If "the Judge" considers it a threat then it is an illegal threat. Quit being emotional and weepy, Weather53.

Wrong.
A judge cannot rule something is illegal.
Something is not illegal until another impartial court case comes down with a guilty verdict.
This is not a dictatorship and judges do not dictate law.
All a judge can do is regulate the conduct in his courtroom.
They can NOT control and dictate what happens outside of the courtroom.
If the judge feels threatened by what Trump is saying, then he has to talk a prosecutor into pressing charges over it. Which he not only has not done, but clearly would never be able to do, since Trump said nothing threatening.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Does not matter.

The gag order is still illegal.

Wrong

it is legal

Your ignorant and uneducated opinion does not define the law

 

[dudmuck]

Does not matter.

The gag order is still illegal.

In general, courts have held that gagging people involved in trials is more acceptable than similar orders issued against the press. Gag orders against people involved in the case is often necessary to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. The goal is a fair trial for everyone involved. You can study more about it here. On appeal, they had narrowed on of the gag orders before. They always weigh free speech rights with the need to protect a fair trial.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The women in Georgia conducted election business without the presence of observers, which is illegal.

The ones on camera all the time ?

 

[boevans]

Wrong.
A judge cannot rule something is illegal.
Something is not illegal until another impartial court case comes down with a guilty verdict.
This is not a dictatorship and judges do not dictate law.
All a judge can do is regulate the conduct in his courtroom.
They can NOT control and dictate what happens outside of the courtroom.
If the judge feels threatened by what Trump is saying, then he has to talk a prosecutor into pressing charges over it. Which he not only has not done, but clearly would never be able to do, since Trump said nothing threatening.

The Judge, of course, can consider and use threats from outside his courtroom to punish activity aimed to interrupt a court's course.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Trump and his big mouth.

The stupid SOB never learns.

/—-/ AHHHH, poor libtards. Trump won’t go to slaughter quiet as a lamb.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The ones on camera all the time ?

/——/ I was an election inspector. That’s not how it works, you know nothing.

 

[okfine]

/—-/ AHHHH, poor libtards. Trump won’t go to slaughter quiet as a lamb.

Poor Trumpy.... Hah Hah Ha! Yep, I watch his little courthouse entrance and exit rants. Just like The Peoples Court but I know what to expect... the same old scared shitless shell of a man.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Attacking the government is EXACTLY what the first amendment is about, dumb ass foreigner.

"attacking?" Nope. Not exactly, but what can people expect from you.

 

[TNHarley]

"attacking?" Nope. Not exactly, but what can people expect from you.

Verbally, yes. Sorry for your luck, boot licker