The curse of socialism…

If you're so against people getting something while doing nothing why don't you eliminate inheritances you flaming bag of hypocrisy?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
If you're so against people getting something while doing nothing why don't you eliminate inheritances you flaming bag of hypocrisy?
That is personal business, thus meaning none of the federal government's business
 
Silly as, all the first world nations are capitalistic with socialist controls. Laissez faire capitialism is as solid a dead end as communism.

And some of our best ideas in this nation are pure socialism, such as our National Park system. Saving the very best and most unique for the enjoyment of all citizens.
 
If you're so against people getting something while doing nothing why don't you eliminate inheritances you flaming bag of hypocrisy?
That is personal business, thus meaning none of the federal government's business

Oh so it's ok to NOT HAVE TO PRODUCE VALUE to earn a living.

As long as it isn't the Government giving you the welfare?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser
How do we go from $10 to $12 in debt the first year of Obama's Presidential budget...

When the deficit for that year (2010) was only $600Billion?

Conclusion:

Your graph, and your people are fucking stupid.
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser
O boy, you lying little cocksuck. You have earned that moniker. If you look at that graph, you see the only time the Dems increased the national debt more than the GOP was when they were pulling us out of a GOP economic debacle, or we were in a major war. Even in 'Nam, the Johnson admin hardly increased the national debt.
 

Well, this is what happens when
1. We cut federal educational dollars for college
2. Don't enforce our anti-trust laws which locks people out of being able to start up a small business as they'll be quickly bought out.
3. We don't really have unions demanding better pay anymore.

So yes, we have more poor people. It is uncontrolled capitalism that is doing it.
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
Actually mixtures of socialism and capitalism.
That is socialism in the modern sense. Regulation of capitalism is socialism, as in the definition RWers always bring up- it say means of production owned or REGULATED by the community...
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
Actually mixtures of socialism and capitalism.
That is socialism in the modern sense. Regulation of capitalism is socialism, as in the definition RWers always bring up- it say means of production owned or REGULATED by the community...

I honestly wouldn't wish to live in any country that didn't regulate and invest within its self. It would be ugly.
 

Well, this is what happens when
1. We cut federal educational dollars for college
2. Don't enforce our anti-trust laws which locks people out of being able to start up a small business as they'll be quickly bought out.
3. We don't really have unions demanding better pay anymore.

So yes, we have more poor people. It is uncontrolled capitalism that is doing it.
And Reaganist pander to the rich and giant corps tax rates and policies...
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser
How do we go from $10 to $12 in debt the first year of Obama's Presidential budget...

When the deficit for that year (2010) was only $600Billion?

Conclusion:

Your graph, and your people are fucking stupid.
The Word deficit means nothing, you're in debt or you're not. If you have more debt than what you can pay at any given moment you're in debt no matter the politically correct politician term of deficit. Actually the debt is far greater than what the graph shows because unfunded liabilities are debt also. Total debt that this government placed on this country is north of 225 trillion most likely.
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser
O boy, you lying little cocksuck. You have earned that moniker. If you look at that graph, you see the only time the Dems increased the national debt more than the GOP was when they were pulling us out of a GOP economic debacle, or we were in a major war. Even in 'Nam, the Johnson admin hardly increased the national debt.
All career politicians no matters the side of the isle they place themselves on are the lowest the lifeforms...
 
Is america socialist or not ? Can we start there ?
The socialist entitlement programs overwhelm the country, of course it's socialist


Ok good .

I'll be blunt . All the winner countries are socialist .
us-federal-debt-by-president-political-party.jpg


A direct result of socialism, sorry to say it's always a loser

Then why did debt EXPLODE under both versions of Supply Side Idiocy?

Why did Easy Al Greenspan name Ronnie and Scrub as the most fiscally reckless POTUS ever?
 

Forum List

Back
Top