The congress should impeach Donald Trump

The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.


Do you agree?

No, doesn't change anything and you end up with Pence in office. Which is better? I think most liberals would prefer Trump, the problem for Trump is whether the conservatives prefer him or not. Has there ever been such a situation where the party in charge preferred the VP instead of the president and done something about it?
 
The bar has been raised so high for what is required to Impeach a US President thanks to Barry that no President will ever be Impeached again.

Barry should have been Impeached his 1st week in office, after declaring he would violate his oath of office by refusing to enforce existing US law because he disagreed with it. This was a signal, his declaration that he would 'rule' on his own as he saw fit.

From that point on Obama has acted unilaterally as a despot, enforcing or violating both the Constitution and Rule of Law as he saw fit to push his own agenda.

He by-passed Congress to make non-recess Cabinet appointments in violation of the Constitution according to the USSC, made his own treaties and had them ratified by the UN before Congress ever saw them, and took the country to war TWICE on his own without Congress' authorization to do so.

These ARE Impeachable offenses....except to a liberal when a liberal does it.

Where does it say a president has to enforce all laws? If all presidents were impeached for not enforcing a federal law, there'd be no presidents left.
 
Where does it say a president has to enforce all laws?
You are seriously trying to justify President Obama's refusal to enforce existing law because he personally did not like certain laws because they were contradictory to his own agenda?!

WTF?!

Tgis is why liberals / liberalism / Democrats are dangerpus to this nation.

Barry did not like the FOIA, either, despite promising the most transparent administration evuh, and violated FOIA - 70% illegally NON-Compliant with ALL FOIA requests submitted to his administration.

This is another great example of another reason Obama could gave / should have been Impeached. 70% illegally non-compliant with FOIA is a LOT of laws broken!

Hell, Hillary violating FOIA with an unauthorized server and hiding e-mails was just following Barry's example.
 
On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?
He can be impeached for any high crimes and misdemeanors, but only after he is sworn in as POTUS. However, when impeached by the House, the Senate then holds the trial with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding in the case of an impeachment of the POTUS! I guess you missed that in your Civics class back in the day!



.... only for high crimes and misdemeanors AFTER he is sworn in ... see 1873 House ruling and subsequent Supreme Court review.

Some constitutional lawyers will tell you that the "high crimes and misdemeanors" only applies to the conduct of his office. In other words, he could murder somebody, but not be impeached (assuming the murder was not related to the conduct of his duties). He would, of course, be tried, convicted, and sentenced to jail, at which time the House would determine that he is unfit to perform his duties and remove him from office under the 25th Amendment. HOWEVER, he would not be impeached.
 
Where does it say a president has to enforce all laws?
You are seriously trying to justify President Obama's refusal to enforce existing law because he personally did not like certain laws because they were contradictory to his own agenda?!

WTF?!

Tgis is why liberals / liberalism / Democrats are dangerpus to this nation.

Barry did not like the FOIA, either, despite promising the most transparent administration evuh, and violated FOIA - 70% illegally NON-Compliant with ALL FOIA requests submitted to his administration.

This is another great example of another reason Obama could gave / should have been Impeached. 70% illegally non-compliant with FOIA is a LOT of laws broken!

Hell, Hillary violating FOIA with an unauthorized server and hiding e-mails was just following Barry's example.

Yes, the Executive is a part of the checks and balances. He isn't Congress's stooge, he can pick and choose. There are too many laws on the books for the President to be able to enforce them all, so he can choose. That's his power.

The Constitution says he has the executive power, it doesn't say he HAS to enforce. Just like Congress doesn't have to make laws, and the Supreme Court doesn't have to interpret the laws.
 
On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?

On what grounds do you have to arrest Hillary clinton when she's not been found guilty of a damn thing?






First you indict. Then you arrest. Then you have a trial. THEN, and only then, do they get to spend time at the gray bar Hilton.
 
see 1873 House ruling and subsequent Supreme Court review.
Post the citations to support your claims then all knowing hot shot! To define the procedure to others who are ignorant of them, all that is needed is the Constitution. If you want to dance in the weeds unbidden, have a fucking ball puffing yourself up!
Impeachment is NOT a legal action - it is a punishment invoked by Congress, and allowed by the Constitution, and is a political action.
And where the fuck did you come with this horseshit, fool? Impeachments may have underlying political motivations, but it's process is define in the Constitution as a LEGAL PROCESS. Given the Constitution is the law of the land, that should have been very apparent. Get up to speed on that point here:
Presidential Impeachment: The Legal Standard and Procedure - FindLaw
 
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.


Do you agree?
manyawning.jpg
 
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.


Do you agree?

You need to search back and look at bills, barrakkk's and hillery's voting record and what executive orders they signed, the lies they told to get into office and the lies and high treasonous acts they did before and during their terms in office . Look at the anti constitution legislature they signed first. Say "Bah, baaaaah".
 
...and what executive orders they signed....
What Executive Orders that Obama signed offended your sensibilities, were unlawful or were unconstitutional?

Here is the addy below for all of Obama's Executive Orders published in the Federal Register and Executive Orders Disposition Tables recorded at the National Archives. Go through them and pick out all of them that offended your sensibilities, were unlawful and/or were unconstitutional and post them back! I'm reall interested is reading your list over!
Barack Obama Executive Orders Disposition Tables
 
Sorry but being a rich entitled over-aged frat-boy who thinks because he is a star he can grab beautiful women by the pussy, is not a high crime. Apparently, about half the electorate does not think that behavior disqualifies him for the highest office in the land. So unless he does something criminal while in office, impeachment is a pipe dream.
 
The bar has been raised so high for what is required to Impeach a US President thanks to Barry that no President will ever be Impeached again.

Barry should have been Impeached his 1st week in office, after declaring he would violate his oath of office by refusing to enforce existing US law because he disagreed with it. This was a signal, his declaration that he would 'rule' on his own as he saw fit.

From that point on Obama has acted unilaterally as a despot, enforcing or violating both the Constitution and Rule of Law as he saw fit to push his own agenda.

He by-passed Congress to make non-recess Cabinet appointments in violation of the Constitution according to the USSC, made his own treaties and had them ratified by the UN before Congress ever saw them, and took the country to war TWICE on his own without Congress' authorization to do so.

These ARE Impeachable offenses....except to a liberal when a liberal does it.

There is no bar. The House can decide to impeach a president for any reason at all, and do so with a simple majority vote.

The Alt-Right media has it wrong as usual.

https://www.bhba.org/foundation/Presidential-Non-Enforcement-and-the-Rule-of-Law.pdf
 
On what grounds can you impeach Trump when he's not been found guilty of a damn thing?

On what grounds do you have to arrest Hillary clinton when she's not been found guilty of a damn thing?






First you indict. Then you arrest. Then you have a trial. THEN, and only then, do they get to spend time at the gray bar Hilton.

LOL after 30+ years of investigations when the fuck are they going to indict her. How many millions more are they going to spend on useless investigations?
 
LOL after 30+ years of investigations when the fuck are they going to indict her. How many millions more are they going to spend on useless investigations?
As you already know, it is hard to indict a Liberal when the President is a Liberal & the Justice Department is run by a Liberal / Obama-puppet.
 
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.


Do you agree?

They can't... As much as I would like it... Trump has to guilty of something while actually President...

If he was caught insider dealing on stocks using privledged information, there is no charge... He is excempt.. (This is why Presidents use blind trusts). and by the way we have no legal athourity find out if he was doing it anyway...

But lets also look at the impeachment anyway, first, you have to get a GOP House and Senate to impeach a GOP President.
If they did it would put Pence in charge, Pence had an approval rating of 40% when picked to be a running mate and has some very boarderline views... He wouldn't put Jesus on the SC because he is not radical enough...

So it looks like we are screwed unless FBI find that they coluded with the Russians during the election and knew about Wikileaks... Very long shot...
 
LOL after 30+ years of investigations when the fuck are they going to indict her. How many millions more are they going to spend on useless investigations?
As you already know, it is hard to indict a Liberal when the President is a Liberal & the Justice Department is run by a Liberal / Obama-puppet.

Baloney. It's hard to indict someone who has not committed a crime. Which is what what all the investigations came up with.

Quit whining, you won.
 

Forum List

Back
Top