- Apr 11, 2023
- 44,087
- 21,431
- 2,488
The law is based on the viability of host and fetus. It is not willy nilly statutes, as the foolish far right prolifers suggest.That's how the laws are written in CA an NY, and probably other Blue States.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The law is based on the viability of host and fetus. It is not willy nilly statutes, as the foolish far right prolifers suggest.That's how the laws are written in CA an NY, and probably other Blue States.
The law is based on the viability of host and fetus. It is not willy nilly statutes, as the foolish far right prolifers suggest.
Yes, NY appears to give priority to the woman.The law in NY doesn't care about fetal viability as long as 1 doctor says the woman's health is at risk.
Not life, health.
Yes, NY appears to give priority to the woman.
Yes, and as a doctor I would trust the doctor's opinion on the matter.And they don't define health. So if a doctor decides her having a rash after birth is a health risk, the law allows them to abort a viable fetus.
Yes, and as a doctor I would trust the doctor's opinion on the matter.
And?
Exceptions don't prove the rule. I would trust a doctor more than I would trust a male politician who can't get pregnant in the first place.We can trust all those doctors?
Exceptions don't prove the rule. I would trust a doctor more than I would trust a male politician who can't get pregnant in the first place.
I trust a doctor to make the call over a Republican politician deciding for all womenAnd they don't define health. So if a doctor decides her having a rash after birth is a health risk, the law allows them to abort a viable fetus.
You would — provided that you get to keep the slaughter of the innocent and helpless preborn humans on the table.I trust a doctor to make the call over a Republican politician deciding for all women
I trust a doctor to make the call over a Republican politician deciding for all women
Yes, as before, it appears than NY gives more weight to concerns of the woman in consultation with her doctor in their calculation.The law allows those "exceptions" to basically sign of on any abortion, at any time, as long as they can claim the woman's health is at risk.
Yes, it gives more weight to the concerns of the woman.You would — provided that you get to keep the slaughter of the innocent and helpless preborn humans on the table.
Yes, as before, it appears than NY gives more weight to concerns of the woman in consultation with her doctor in their calculation.
And the Confederacy was still an evil empireYou would — provided that you get to keep the slaughter of the innocent and helpless preborn humans on the table.
Yes, it gives more weight to the concerns of the woman.
Actually, that’s true. Side topics somehow tend to take on a life of their own.I just realized, wow this thread sure shifted from the Confederacy didn't it!
It gives no weight of any kind to the lives of the preborn humans.
Actually, that’s true. Side topics somehow tend to take on a life of their own.
Probably because they believe its an issue of fundamental personal autonomy between the woman and her body, with the doctor in consultation, vs. some old white guys who can't have babies. But I am not from NY so don't know.it gives them a blank check.
And why is that?