That 2019 impeachment

That's not the issue.
Appears you’re quite reliant to discuss “the issue” except in vague and shifting gestures.

Sure, it was second hand information. That doesn’t mean it’s false information. In fact, we know it wasn’t.

Is Gabbard just mad that they found out about the phone call?
 
I was thinking about this also. It's shown that Democrats broke laws to usurp a president's power and attempt to remove Him from office. Ilegal fraudulent accusations. Their findings should be reversed and Trump's impeachment removed.



Evidence? You claim to care about evidence. You obviously don't.
 
Appears you’re quite reliant to discuss “the issue” except in vague and shifting gestures.

Sure, it was second hand information. That doesn’t mean it’s false information. In fact, we know it wasn’t.

Is Gabbard just mad that they found out about the phone call?
It's the fact that you're trying to make this about something it's not.
 
It's the fact that you're trying to make this about something it's not.
Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.

The criticisms seem to twofold.
1. The information was second hand
2. The whistleblowers were democratic.

Neither of which matter, especially in light of the fact that the whistleblower account was accurate.
 
Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.
Already have several times. You're trying to make this about the validity of the call. As I already pointed out, that's not the case.
 
The summary of the phone call was consistent with the whistleblower report.

That’s what I don’t get about this little exercise.
The transcript of the phone call proved he did nothing wrong. Democrats ignored it however and went on with their dishonest folly. Now it comes out that the Whistleblower was actually a partisan Democrat. The whole thing really had a foul smell to it.
It will be interesting how the doj handles this new information. Very fitting for some prison sentences to be handed out and Adam Schiff to be one of them.. the fake Russia Russia Russia collusion and the Ukrainian fake impeachment sure-turned me against the Democrats.
 
Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.

The criticisms seem to twofold.
1. The information was second hand
2. The whistleblowers were democratic.

Neither of which matter, especially in light of the fact that the whistleblower account was accurate.
How can it be accurate if the information was secondhand? Do you think Trump should be able to get to the impeachment expunged?
 
Hey dumbass, what kind of people defend child traffickers? What kind of person says they deserve to be out of prison? What kind of person gets accused of ******* kids on an island known for child trafficking while being on retainer for the pedophile owner? What kind of person stays on retainer for a known pedo?
It isnt good people that arent attracted to children. Thats who.
But defend him. As I said IDC. Nothing you do surprises me anymore.
You do not know that he was cleared?
 
The last 3 impeachments have all been total bullshit. What Congress needs to do is represent their constituents or be kicked the feck out of office.
Mufuggers have an impeachment party every day in Congress and have lobster and watercress sandwiches with the crusts cut off catered in every day for brunch.
Meanwhile, roads crumble and state issues get ignored. :rolleyes-41:
That is NOT how it is supposed to be. :nono:
Clinton nor Trump deserved any kind of impeachment proceedings. No.
Just thought I would point out that neither are federal government's business. State issues are state issues.
 
Who do Senators and Reps represent? :rolleyes-41:
Let me rephrase that: Who are Senators and Reps supposed to represent?
They represent districts/states in the federal government. Whether Hawaii is maintaining their roads is none of Tennessee's business, and vice versa. They are part of the federal government, a point which is lost on many in and out of government.
 
They represent districts/states in the federal government. Whether Hawaii is maintaining their roads is none of Tennessee's business, and vice versa. They are part of the federal government, a point which is lost on many in and out of government.
They are supposed to be representing the people in their districts and states. :rolleyes-41:
 
15th post
Who honestly gives a shit about an impeachment? He was not convicted by the Senate. No one ever has been. That is like saying that when you are found not guilty for murder and set free, that they should indict the people who indicted you? It's just another political circle jerk and the American people are the pivot man! We should, as the Dems used to say, move on!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom