- Thread starter
- #81
That's not the issue.The summary of the phone call was consistent with the whistleblower report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not the issue.The summary of the phone call was consistent with the whistleblower report.
Appears you’re quite reliant to discuss “the issue” except in vague and shifting gestures.That's not the issue.
I was thinking about this also. It's shown that Democrats broke laws to usurp a president's power and attempt to remove Him from office. Ilegal fraudulent accusations. Their findings should be reversed and Trump's impeachment removed.
It's the fact that you're trying to make this about something it's not.Appears you’re quite reliant to discuss “the issue” except in vague and shifting gestures.
Sure, it was second hand information. That doesn’t mean it’s false information. In fact, we know it wasn’t.
Is Gabbard just mad that they found out about the phone call?
Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.It's the fact that you're trying to make this about something it's not.
Already have several times. You're trying to make this about the validity of the call. As I already pointed out, that's not the case.Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.
The transcript of the phone call proved he did nothing wrong. Democrats ignored it however and went on with their dishonest folly. Now it comes out that the Whistleblower was actually a partisan Democrat. The whole thing really had a foul smell to it.The summary of the phone call was consistent with the whistleblower report.
That’s what I don’t get about this little exercise.
How can it be accurate if the information was secondhand? Do you think Trump should be able to get to the impeachment expunged?Eventually you’ll actually get around to telling us what you “think” it is, if you think at all.
The criticisms seem to twofold.
1. The information was second hand
2. The whistleblowers were democratic.
Neither of which matter, especially in light of the fact that the whistleblower account was accurate.
Are you taking bets on that?We can only hope in 2027, your orange doofus is impeached and removed.
Who?So when Jonathan Hurley says the same thing you'll be happy?
Not what you said!T-T-T-Turley......![]()

You do not know that he was cleared?Hey dumbass, what kind of people defend child traffickers? What kind of person says they deserve to be out of prison? What kind of person gets accused of ******* kids on an island known for child trafficking while being on retainer for the pedophile owner? What kind of person stays on retainer for a known pedo?
It isnt good people that arent attracted to children. Thats who.
But defend him. As I said IDC. Nothing you do surprises me anymore.
Just thought I would point out that neither are federal government's business. State issues are state issues.The last 3 impeachments have all been total bullshit. What Congress needs to do is represent their constituents or be kicked the feck out of office.
Mufuggers have an impeachment party every day in Congress and have lobster and watercress sandwiches with the crusts cut off catered in every day for brunch.
Meanwhile, roads crumble and state issues get ignored.
That is NOT how it is supposed to be.
Clinton nor Trump deserved any kind of impeachment proceedings. No.
Who do Senators and Reps represent?Just thought I would point out that neither are federal government's business. State issues are state issues.

They represent districts/states in the federal government. Whether Hawaii is maintaining their roads is none of Tennessee's business, and vice versa. They are part of the federal government, a point which is lost on many in and out of government.Who do Senators and Reps represent?
Let me rephrase that: Who are Senators and Reps supposed to represent?
They are supposed to be representing the people in their districts and states.They represent districts/states in the federal government. Whether Hawaii is maintaining their roads is none of Tennessee's business, and vice versa. They are part of the federal government, a point which is lost on many in and out of government.

WTF does that have to do with roads in Hawaii, or Boston, or Miami? Not a GD thing!They are supposed to be representing the people in their districts and states.![]()
The history books should reflect the fact that the democrats lied and committed fraud in order to take out Trump.Who honestly gives a shit about an impeachment?
What the **** do history books have to do with courts? Please show me how you overturn an impeachment.The history books should reflect the fact that the democrats lied and committed fraud in order to take out Trump.