That 2019 impeachment

[Delldude]

Just because the whistleblower was a democrat, doesn’t mean you ignore the complaint.

More details, click 'show more'.

First Trump Impeachment

Whistleblower Motive

Whistleblower met with Democrats on House Intelligence Committee (then led by Adam Schiff) BEFORE reporting his allegations to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
__________
Ratcliffe: The whistleblower did not disclose to you that he or she had contact with HPSCI (House Intelligence Committee)?

Atkinson: The answer to that is yes. The answer to that is yes.

Atkinson: On the urgent disclosure form, there's a question that the complainant is asked about who they have reported the violation to...and one of the boxes is the congressional intelligence committees. The complainant did not check that box.

 

[Marener]

More details, click 'show more'.

Quite the nit-pick. Is that the best you can do?

It doesn't even prove anything. Where is the evidence that the person reported the violation to Congress?

 

[Delldude]

It doesn't even prove anything. Where is the evidence that the person reported the violation to Congress?

Ah, in congressional testimony provided in transcripts.

Violation or seditious conspiracy?

 

[Marener]

Ah, in congressional testimony provided in transcripts.

Violation or seditious conspiracy?

I read the testimony. It doesn't include any evidence that he reported the violation to Congress.

 

[Alweysrite!]

The whistleblower prompted an investigation and the information from the investigation was used to impeach him.

It’s a huge difference.

The information was specious and illegal. So you are wrong. Similar to the Russian collusion thing. You are wrong there too. Don't you get tired of being wrong?

 

[Marener]

The information was specious and illegal. So you are wrong. Similar to the Russian collusion thing. You are wrong there too. Don't you get tired of being wrong?

Nothing illegal about the information. You can call it specious if you want, but we know that it was accurate.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Nothing illegal about the information. You can call it specious if you want, but we know that it was accurate.

Actually it was secondhand and hearsay. You can't go by that. Similar to the Trump grabbing the wheel of the Beast. Did you believe that also? Why are you guys so dishonest? Is it that important to have power?

 

[Delldude]

I read the testimony. It doesn't include any evidence that he reported the violation to Congress.

You must have missed the part where Ratcliffe asked about the form.

 

[Marener]

Actually it was secondhand and hearsay. You can't go by that. Similar to the Trump grabbing the wheel of the Beast. Did you believe that also? Why are you guys so dishonest? Is it that important to have power?

They didn't go by that. They did an investigation and found ample evidence to show the hearsay was accurate.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

 

[Lockback]

They didn't go by that. They did an investigation and found ample evidence to show the hearsay was accurate.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

All baloney.
Perfect for the Democrat Party.

 

[Marener]

You must have missed the part where Ratcliffe asked about the form.

I heard Ratcliffe ask about the form. I did not hear Ratcliffe provide evidence that the whistleblower reported the violation to Congress.

 

[Delldude]

I heard Ratcliffe ask about the form. I did not hear Ratcliffe provide evidence that the whistleblower reported the violation to Congress.

You're such a clown. You talk about me being a political hack.

It was the person who replied to Ratcliffes question that supplied the evidence. He was Michael K. Atkinson, Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, in sworn testimony.

 

[Marener]

You're such a clown. You talk about me being a political hack.

It was the person who replied to Ratcliffes question that supplied the evidence. He was Michael K. Atkinson, Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, in sworn testimony.

You are a political hack, because you don't know what you're talking about and didn't read the testimony.
Michael K Atkinson couldn't have provided that evidence because he had no idea about any contact between HPSCI and the whistleblower. To wit:

 

[Alweysrite!]

They didn't go by that. They did an investigation and found ample evidence to show the hearsay was accurate.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Seriously, someday you're going to wake up to see that your obstruction of this Administration is tantamount to being a traitor to the United States. We would be so much farther ahead if you hadn't have lied and cheated about Trump during his first term and even now it is really quite Unforgivable traitor . Stop lying and cheating. Hearsay evidence is actually against our constitutional way of life.

 

[Marener]

Seriously, someday you're going to wake up to see that your obstruction of this Administration is tantamount to being a traitor to the United States. We would be so much farther ahead if you hadn't have lied and cheated about Trump during his first term and even now it is really quite Unforgivable traitor . Stop lying and cheating. Hearsay evidence is actually against our constitutional way of life.

Your problem is you've lost touch with reality.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Your problem is you've lost touch with reality.

You are all of our problem. Go away and come back when you actually have an argument. You've lost this one as I've beaten you every time. You are always wrong.

 

[Marener]

You are all of our problem. Go away and come back when you actually have an argument. You've lost this one as I've beaten you every time. You are always wrong.

I’ve made my argument. All you’ve done is miss the point and whine incessantly.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Whistleblower contacted Democrats before Trump complaint, records show

Records show a key whistleblower contacted Democrats before filing the complaint that led to President Donald Trump's first impeachment in 2019.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

Docs Show Impeachment 'Whistleblower' Was A Democrat Crony

The anonymous whistleblower secretly met with the Democrat staff of Adam Schiff prior to submitting his complaint in August 2019.

thefederalist.com

ERIC CIARAMELLA WAS A DEM OPERATIVE!

I AM SHOCKED,

The name censored from all media. THE SECRET WHISTLEBLOWER!

Dems are phucking filthy.

 

[Delldude]

You are a political hack, because you don't know what you're talking about and didn't read the testimony.
Michael K Atkinson couldn't have provided that evidence because he had no idea about any contact between HPSCI and the whistleblower.

LOL....you conveniently overlooked this two paragraphs prior to your 'evidence'.

Atkinson admits he was aware of what wasn't put on the disclosure form. Admits WB did not notify him. Down the road, MSM caught on to Schiff being complicit before the WB complaint was filed, he denied it, WB had to run to the IG and rat himself out. It's in linked items previously.