Thank you Trump!

[Astrostar]

Trump is back in the headlines, and it may cost Republicans in November

Midterm elections tend to follow a predictable script. The party in the White House loses seats in the Senate, and especially in the House. Political scientists call this a "presidential penalty."

www.cnn.com

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

He is the gift that just keeps on giving. Bigly!!!

 

[playtime]

it's sooooooooo not looking good for them.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Trump is back in the headlines, and it may cost Republicans in November

Midterm elections tend to follow a predictable script. The party in the White House loses seats in the Senate, and especially in the House. Political scientists call this a "presidential penalty."

www.cnn.com

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

You're going to be in for one hell of a disappointment!

 

[Confederate Soldier]

I thought we were a cult that would follow him to the ends of the earth, i.e turn out in droves to vote for him???

 

[okfine]

I thought we were a cult that would follow him to the ends of the earth, i.e turn out in droves to vote for him???

Jumping off a cliff. Does that equate to a win? Hah!

 

[Indeependent]

Trump is back in the headlines, and it may cost Republicans in November

Midterm elections tend to follow a predictable script. The party in the White House loses seats in the Senate, and especially in the House. Political scientists call this a "presidential penalty."

www.cnn.com

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

He is the gift that just keeps on giving. Bigly!!!

CNN! What a shock!

 

[airplanemechanic]

Hmm, is that why Trump supported candidates won candidly in their primaries?

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2022-08-10/trump-backed-candidates-win-state-primaries

Trump made 30 endorsements in recent primaries. Here's who won.

The former president backed a slew of Republicans running unopposed in their primaries Tuesday.

www.politico.com

Looks like Trump endorsed candidates won 30 races, hands down. The only one that lost was Sarah Palin, but she's a joke to begin with. She's a nice mom and housewife but shes too goofy.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Jumping off a cliff. Does that equate to a win? Hah!

We're already in a freefall, getting back to the top of the cliff looks pretty good.

 

[progressive hunter]

Trump is back in the headlines, and it may cost Republicans in November

Midterm elections tend to follow a predictable script. The party in the White House loses seats in the Senate, and especially in the House. Political scientists call this a "presidential penalty."

www.cnn.com

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

He is the gift that just keeps on giving. Bigly!!!

WOW: This side-by-side comparison of Joe Biden’s PA rally with Donald Trump’s is INSANE

We know a Trump rally is going to have more people show up than a Biden event. I mean that was the story of the 2020 campaign trail that the media never told but anyone could see. They didn’t…

therightscoop.com

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Thanks for that, I needed a good laugh.

 

[airplanemechanic]

As long as it still takes 400 dollars to fill a basket with food at Wal Mart, Trump is a shoe in in 24 if he runs.

 

[skye]

CNN! What a shock!

Exactly. You see, that's the problem with Crap News Network (CNN) totally predictable, orange man bad etc....etc.... oh well.

 

[Indeependent]

Exactly. You see, that's the problem with Crap News Network (CNN) totally predictable, orange man bad etc....etc.... oh well.

Crap News!
I It!

 

[playtime]

I thought we were a cult

*you* are.

that would follow him to the ends of the earth,

*you* have.

i.e turn out in droves to vote for him???

*you* will. but upright critical thinking american bipeds will come out in even bigger numbers to vote against him.

just like in 2020.

 

[playtime]

Jumping off a cliff. Does that equate to a win? Hah!

 

[playtime]

Hmm, is that why Trump supported candidates won candidly in their primaries?

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2022-08-10/trump-backed-candidates-win-state-primaries

Trump made 30 endorsements in recent primaries. Here's who won.

The former president backed a slew of Republicans running unopposed in their primaries Tuesday.

www.politico.com

Looks like Trump endorsed candidates won 30 races, hands down. The only one that lost was Sarah Palin, but she's a joke to begin with. She's a nice mom and housewife but shes too goofy.

primaries are one thing ... & btw, THAT media whore lost to a (D) ... in a one rep red state. lol! she said she'll be back in november, 'cause she's not a quitter' - yaaaaaaaaaaaaaa......... like her governorship? anyway, i digress. we'll see whether she gets the gig or not in the actual election .... just like whether J D vance, brain damaged hershell walker, quacky OZ, or the nutter in PA.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Trump is back in the headlines, and it may cost Republicans in November

Midterm elections tend to follow a predictable script. The party in the White House loses seats in the Senate, and especially in the House. Political scientists call this a "presidential penalty."

www.cnn.com

Thanks to Trump, the political disaster, Democrats are back in the driver's seat for the November elections.

He is the gift that just keeps on giving. Bigly!!!

/-----/ Quinnipiac has a decades-long history of oversampling democrats in their polls.

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats ... - PJ Media​

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats Just Might Not Accurately Predict the Election​

 

[playtime]

/-----/ Quinnipiac has a decades-long history of oversampling democrats in their polls.

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats ... - PJ Media​

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats Just Might Not Accurately Predict the Election​

Quinnipiac University media bias rating is Center.​

Quinnipiac University Poll is run by the university's polling institute that provides frequently cited, highly respected polls generally on elections, candidates, presidential and congressional approval ratings and other issues in Connecticut, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, New York (and New York City), Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia and nationwide (based on review of their website in May 2016). Quinnipiac University is based in Connecticut.
Quinnipiac University Media Bias Rating

FiveThirtyEight’s Pollster Ratings​

Based on the historical accuracy and methodology of each polling organization’s polls.​

Read moreDownload the dataSee the latest polls
BACK TO ALL POLLSTERS

Quinnipiac University​

A-

Polls analyzed	219
Races called correctly	82%
Most recent cycle	2020
Affiliated with professional polling organization (NCPP/AAPOR/Roper)	Yes

Pollster Ratings - Quinnipiac University

 

[playtime]

/-----/ Quinnipiac has a decades-long history of oversampling democrats in their polls.

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats ... - PJ Media​

Quinnipiac Pollster Admits that Polls Oversampling Democrats Just Might Not Accurately Predict the Election​

OH! & 1 more thing...

PJ Media​

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
PJ Media

 

[Cellblock2429]

OH! & 1 more thing...

PJ Media​

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
PJ Media

/------/ When you can't refute the message, attack the messenger - Saul Alinsky.

So, you're saying Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac polling operation, was lying when he was being interviewed by talk show host Hugh Hewitt, neither of which work for PJ Media? Are you saying PJ Media just made up the interview out of thin air? I honestly don't understand the point you are trying to make.

From the link I posted:
Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac polling operation was particularly squeamish about sampling under tough questioning from Hewitt about a poll which Quinnipiac had released showing Democrats with a 9 percentage point advantage in the state of Florida.

In the conversation, Brown defended Quinnipiac’s sampling techniques but admitted that he did not believe that Democrats would outnumber Republicans to that degree in Florida come November. Pressed by Hewitt, the pollster said he believed that was a “probably unlikely” scenario. Instead, Brown kept saying that he thought his poll was an accurate snapshot of reality at the time.