Ted Nugent Shoots Back. Bullseye.

[Luddly Neddite]

He did have sex with a 12-year-old

Holy toledo!!!!!!!! Courtney Love claimed he did. There is absolutely no proof of this whatsoever. And she made the claim years after she says she gave him head.

I mean come on here. AND it's Courtney Love for crying out loud. A known pathological liar.

That's funny. That's really funny.

And its it typical to blame the victim.

 

[Ibentoken]

Nothing funnier than self righteous leftists crying over sexual shenanigans. No one cared about Ted's history until he started calling Obama names. When are y'all gonna trash James Woods and Jon Voigt?

 

[Vandalshandle]

The truth is that Ted is such an easy target...sort of like Justin Bieber....

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nothing funnier than self righteous leftists crying over sexual shenanigans. No one cared about Ted's history until he started calling Obama names. When are y'all gonna trash James Woods and Jon Voigt?

We cared, but not that much, long before then, you just don't know it...

 

[Camp]

Rape of a 12 year old is considered "sexual shenanigans" to at least one defender of poopy pants.

Has anyone found an article reporting that the pedophile has called the rape victim a liar and making a denial of the charges, or does he still stick to the excuse that he forgot about the incident and can't remember if he raped the kid or not? He can't recall, does anyone believe that?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Rape of a 12 year old is considered "sexual shenanigans" to at least one defender of poopy pants.

Has anyone found an article reporting that the pedophile has called the rape victim a liar and making a denial of the charges, or does he still stick to the excuse that he forgot about the incident and can't remember if he raped the kid or not? He can't recall, does anyone believe that?

He's innocent until proven guilty. Where's your proof?

 

[Camp]

Rape of a 12 year old is considered "sexual shenanigans" to at least one defender of poopy pants.

Has anyone found an article reporting that the pedophile has called the rape victim a liar and making a denial of the charges, or does he still stick to the excuse that he forgot about the incident and can't remember if he raped the kid or not? He can't recall, does anyone believe that?

He's innocent until proven guilty. Where's your proof?

He may be innocent in a court of law, because the case never got to a court of law, but the public can make different conclusions and have different opinions. That has always been the way in America. The government can not put a person in jail until they are found guilty in a court, but we all know money, lawyers, political connections, etc. can keep a guilty person from facing justice and an innocent person can be sent to jail. The public is not obligated to follow the same standards as the courts.
The proof for the public has been given in detail. The rape victim made the accusation and Nugent has never denied it. People don't believe a man would forget about raping a child unless he had similar incidents with other children and couldn't remember this specific child. No one believes a man would forget about raping a child. It just isn't a believable story. Adding the fact he wrote and recorded songs about sex with thirteen year old girls does not help his case.
What makes sense is that Nugent will never deny it and call the victim a liar because that would open the case up to a civil court trial if the victim decided to file for libel and slander.
Ted knows that the gossip has it that the victim reported the rape to friends at the time of the incident and the story was known by insiders long before the victim spoke out in public. The publicity of a trial could bring more victims forward.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Rape of a 12 year old is considered "sexual shenanigans" to at least one defender of poopy pants.

Has anyone found an article reporting that the pedophile has called the rape victim a liar and making a denial of the charges, or does he still stick to the excuse that he forgot about the incident and can't remember if he raped the kid or not? He can't recall, does anyone believe that?

He's innocent until proven guilty. Where's your proof?

He may be innocent in a court of law, because the case never got to a court of law, but the public can make different conclusions and have different opinions. That has always been the way in America. The government can not put a person in jail until they are found guilty in a court, but we all know money, lawyers, political connections, etc. can keep a guilty person from facing justice and an innocent person can be sent to jail. The public is not obligated to follow the same standards as the courts.
The proof for the public has been given in detail. The rape victim made the accusation and Nugent has never denied it. People don't believe a man would forget about raping a child unless he had similar incidents with other children and couldn't remember this specific child. No one believes a man would forget about raping a child. It just isn't a believable story. Adding the fact he wrote and recorded songs about sex with thirteen year old girls does not help his case.
What makes sense is that Nugent will never deny it and call the victim a liar because that would open the case up to a civil court trial if the victim decided to file for libel and slander.
Ted knows that the gossip has it that the victim reported the rape to friends at the time of the incident and the story was known by insiders long before the victim spoke out in public. The publicity of a trial could bring more victims forward.

Accusations don't prove anything moron!

The only thing that has been proven is that you idiots will believe whatever lie you want to believe.

If Ted called the victim a liar then he in fact did deny it.

You people are retarded.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Nothing funnier than self righteous leftists crying over sexual shenanigans. No one cared about Ted's history until he started calling Obama names. When are y'all gonna trash James Woods and Jon Voigt?

Don't know anything about James woods but Voight sold out to the tee potties long time ago. He's all yours.

And I despised slime ole poopy pants long before he lied about Obama. The first I heard of his chicken shit draft dodging was back during the VN war when real men were getting killed in service of their country. Typically, you hypocrites don't have a problem with that either.

As for ignoring sexual shenanigans, RWs made excuses for that old fart Duck Dynasty telling the bible group they should marry little girls and you all make excuses for the scummy catholic church hiding their pedophiles.

Fact is, just like tiny dancer, RWs will get in bed with anyone if they promise to hate minorities and women and children and promise to take all your money.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Rape of a 12 year old is considered "sexual shenanigans" to at least one defender of poopy pants.

Has anyone found an article reporting that the pedophile has called the rape victim a liar and making a denial of the charges, or does he still stick to the excuse that he forgot about the incident and can't remember if he raped the kid or not? He can't recall, does anyone believe that?

He's innocent until proven guilty. Where's your proof?

He may be innocent in a court of law, because the case never got to a court of law, but the public can make different conclusions and have different opinions. That has always been the way in America. The government can not put a person in jail until they are found guilty in a court, but we all know money, lawyers, political connections, etc. can keep a guilty person from facing justice and an innocent person can be sent to jail. The public is not obligated to follow the same standards as the courts.
The proof for the public has been given in detail. The rape victim made the accusation and Nugent has never denied it. People don't believe a man would forget about raping a child unless he had similar incidents with other children and couldn't remember this specific child. No one believes a man would forget about raping a child. It just isn't a believable story. Adding the fact he wrote and recorded songs about sex with thirteen year old girls does not help his case.
What makes sense is that Nugent will never deny it and call the victim a liar because that would open the case up to a civil court trial if the victim decided to file for libel and slander.
Ted knows that the gossip has it that the victim reported the rape to friends at the time of the incident and the story was known by insiders long before the victim spoke out in public. The publicity of a trial could bring more victims forward.

Actually, he has admitted to it and made fun of her. I think its in one of the articles quoted in one of the threads here.

RWs don't care that he's a shit covered draft dodger child molester. All they care about is that he throws them some red meat every so often. He makes the right sounds of hate and they eat it up.

Funny part is, his gig was canceled because they heard just how bad this jerk really is.

 

[Camp]

He's innocent until proven guilty. Where's your proof?

He may be innocent in a court of law, because the case never got to a court of law, but the public can make different conclusions and have different opinions. That has always been the way in America. The government can not put a person in jail until they are found guilty in a court, but we all know money, lawyers, political connections, etc. can keep a guilty person from facing justice and an innocent person can be sent to jail. The public is not obligated to follow the same standards as the courts.
The proof for the public has been given in detail. The rape victim made the accusation and Nugent has never denied it. People don't believe a man would forget about raping a child unless he had similar incidents with other children and couldn't remember this specific child. No one believes a man would forget about raping a child. It just isn't a believable story. Adding the fact he wrote and recorded songs about sex with thirteen year old girls does not help his case.
What makes sense is that Nugent will never deny it and call the victim a liar because that would open the case up to a civil court trial if the victim decided to file for libel and slander.
Ted knows that the gossip has it that the victim reported the rape to friends at the time of the incident and the story was known by insiders long before the victim spoke out in public. The publicity of a trial could bring more victims forward.

Accusations don't prove anything moron!

The only thing that has been proven is that you idiots will believe whatever lie you want to believe.

If Ted called the victim a liar then he in fact did deny it.

You people are retarded.

Hey, amazing you call someone an moron and retarded when you go on a rant without even the basic idea or concept of the persons post. The point of my post was that Nugent has never called the victim a liar because if he did she would have cause to file a libel and slander suite.
Instead of useless name calling, how about explaining why a guy who is accused of rape does not call the accuser a liar and deny the allegation.
Now go search the internet and show us the link that has your hero the pedophile Ted Nugent calling his victim a liar. If you can't find one, maybe as a substitute you could fill everyone in on why folks find it so important to defend this pedophile.

 

[OnePercenter]

What's he doing?

He wants to continue to pay less effective tax than you.

He wants to reduce those pesky regulations like blade guards for meat cutters to increase his return on investment.

Anything else?

Yeah. Mind your own business and God Bless America.

You asked a question and I gave you a factual response.

 

[tinydancer]

He may be innocent in a court of law, because the case never got to a court of law, but the public can make different conclusions and have different opinions. That has always been the way in America. The government can not put a person in jail until they are found guilty in a court, but we all know money, lawyers, political connections, etc. can keep a guilty person from facing justice and an innocent person can be sent to jail. The public is not obligated to follow the same standards as the courts.
The proof for the public has been given in detail. The rape victim made the accusation and Nugent has never denied it. People don't believe a man would forget about raping a child unless he had similar incidents with other children and couldn't remember this specific child. No one believes a man would forget about raping a child. It just isn't a believable story. Adding the fact he wrote and recorded songs about sex with thirteen year old girls does not help his case.
What makes sense is that Nugent will never deny it and call the victim a liar because that would open the case up to a civil court trial if the victim decided to file for libel and slander.
Ted knows that the gossip has it that the victim reported the rape to friends at the time of the incident and the story was known by insiders long before the victim spoke out in public. The publicity of a trial could bring more victims forward.

Accusations don't prove anything moron!

The only thing that has been proven is that you idiots will believe whatever lie you want to believe.

If Ted called the victim a liar then he in fact did deny it.

You people are retarded.

Hey, amazing you call someone an moron and retarded when you go on a rant without even the basic idea or concept of the persons post. The point of my post was that Nugent has never called the victim a liar because if he did she would have cause to file a libel and slander suite.
Instead of useless name calling, how about explaining why a guy who is accused of rape does not call the accuser a liar and deny the allegation.
Now go search the internet and show us the link that has your hero the pedophile Ted Nugent calling his victim a liar. If you can't find one, maybe as a substitute you could fill everyone in on why folks find it so important to defend this pedophile.

Well you're turning Courtney Love into the heroine of your fairy tale aren't you now?

Nugent doesn't have to come out and call Love a liar. Why? Because she is well known as a pathological liar.

She lied about David Grohl hitting on her daughter. And the ******* ***** even lied and said that Grohl was sexually obsessed with Kurt for crying out loud. She lied about Billy Corgan (Smashing Pumpkins) being obsessed with her daughter. She lied about Gwen Stefani.

She lies, lies and has been caught out in so many. It got so bad over Grohl that her own freaking daughter wished that Twitter would cancel her mothers account.

 

[tinydancer]

Courtney the liar. Lies about everything and everyone. BUT to left wing whackos she has to be telling the truth that she gave Nugent head age 12.



Courtney Love has accused Dave Grohl of attempting to seduce her 19-year-old daughter, Frances Bean Cobain.

The Hole singer, who is estranged from her only child, made the accusations on her private Twitter account last night. She claims that her daughter’s roommate told her that the Foo Fighters frontman – who is known as one of the nicest men in rock – “hit on Frances,” according to Gawker.

Grohl,43, is, for the uninitiated, the former Nirvana bandmate and best friend of Frances’ father, Kurt Cobain. He has therefore known her since she was a baby.

Grohl responded to Love’s accusations in a statement, he said: “Unfortunately Courtney is on another hateful Twitter rant. These new accusations are upsetting, offensive and absolutely untrue.”

After the initial incredible allegation, Love went on to threaten a Twitter account she obviously believed belonged to Grohl, although it is actually linked to a German IT worker who hasn’t tweeted since 2008, according to the website.

She talked about Grohl’s “pathology,” insisting that Foo Fighters drummer Taylor Hawkins resembles Cobain and is in the “submissive drummer position” in his hugely successful band. It has to be noted that Hawkins actually looks more like Grohl, albeit with Kurt-coloured straw blonde hair.

She also argued that the fact Grohl called one of his daughters Violet is salient, as a Hole song shares the same name. However, his eldest child, who turns six on Sunday, was named after Grohl’s maternal grandmother, as he’s stated in many interviews. The happily married rocker also has daughter Harper, who turns three next week, by his wife of nine years, Jordyn Blum.

He is one of the most beloved artists in the world, and unusually for a rock star, all the tales about him relate to his generous and moral character.


Unencumbered by actual facts, however, Courtney also accused Grohl of being “sexually obsessed” with Kurt then relayed information from a driver who claimed that Grohl had “his hands all over” Frances in his car.

She also insisted that the Ohio born star, who grew up in a suburb of Washington D.C, has tried to seduce Courtney herself in the past.

This is far from the first time Love has attacked Grohl.

Last November, the singer started ranting about him taking food from her child’s table at a festival in Brazil after a fan flashed a poster of Cobain in the audience. It’s alleged the pair have clashed over Nirvana copyright issues, yet Grohl has kept his counsel about Love and his friend.

UPDATE: Gawker now has an response from Frances on the situation: “While I’m generally silent on the affairs of my biological mother, her recent tirade has taken a gross turn.

I have never been approached by Dave Grohl in more than a platonic way. I’m in a monogamous relationship and very happy. Twitter should ban my mother.”

More garbage from Love at this link:

Cele|bitchy | Courtney Love accuses Dave Grohl of trying to seduce Frances Cobain (update)

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Accusations don't prove anything moron!

The only thing that has been proven is that you idiots will believe whatever lie you want to believe.

If Ted called the victim a liar then he in fact did deny it.

You people are retarded.

Hey, amazing you call someone an moron and retarded when you go on a rant without even the basic idea or concept of the persons post. The point of my post was that Nugent has never called the victim a liar because if he did she would have cause to file a libel and slander suite.
Instead of useless name calling, how about explaining why a guy who is accused of rape does not call the accuser a liar and deny the allegation.
Now go search the internet and show us the link that has your hero the pedophile Ted Nugent calling his victim a liar. If you can't find one, maybe as a substitute you could fill everyone in on why folks find it so important to defend this pedophile.

Well you're turning Courtney Love into the heroine of your fairy tale aren't you now?

Nugent doesn't have to come out and call Love a liar. Why? Because she is well known as a pathological liar.

She lied about David Grohl hitting on her daughter. And the ******* ***** even lied and said that Grohl was sexually obsessed with Kurt for crying out loud. She lied about Billy Corgan (Smashing Pumpkins) being obsessed with her daughter. She lied about Gwen Stefani.

She lies, lies and has been caught out in so many. It got so bad over Grohl that her own freaking daughter wished that Twitter would cancel her mothers account.

Maybe she's a mess, maybe she's that way because she was sexually abused? Frankly, with what Ted admits to, I wouldn't go there.

 

[tinydancer]

Hey, amazing you call someone an moron and retarded when you go on a rant without even the basic idea or concept of the persons post. The point of my post was that Nugent has never called the victim a liar because if he did she would have cause to file a libel and slander suite.
Instead of useless name calling, how about explaining why a guy who is accused of rape does not call the accuser a liar and deny the allegation.
Now go search the internet and show us the link that has your hero the pedophile Ted Nugent calling his victim a liar. If you can't find one, maybe as a substitute you could fill everyone in on why folks find it so important to defend this pedophile.

Well you're turning Courtney Love into the heroine of your fairy tale aren't you now?

Nugent doesn't have to come out and call Love a liar. Why? Because she is well known as a pathological liar.

She lied about David Grohl hitting on her daughter. And the ******* ***** even lied and said that Grohl was sexually obsessed with Kurt for crying out loud. She lied about Billy Corgan (Smashing Pumpkins) being obsessed with her daughter. She lied about Gwen Stefani.

She lies, lies and has been caught out in so many. It got so bad over Grohl that her own freaking daughter wished that Twitter would cancel her mothers account.

Maybe she's a mess, maybe she's that way because she was sexually abused? Frankly, with what Ted admits to, I wouldn't go there.

I don't believe a word she says. And for anyone to try to blame Courtney Love's fucked up existence on Ted Nugent would say volumes about a hater's insanity.

I put up links to back my assertions on a regular basis. Here's more about the new heroine for the left wing whackos.

Anyone believing a damn thing that comes out of this ***** from hell's mouth is a fool.

Then Courtney claimed her ex boyfriend, Smashing Pumpkins star Billy Corgan was obsessed with her daughter, writing on Twitter: "I really think its truly creepy how jealous and obsessed w [Frances] he is GROSS.




There was the Lily Allen Twitter fight, where she accused Lily of "taking coke in my house" - Lily strongly denied this

And the random row with Australian band The Veronicas, who she accused of wearing her stolen dresses after buying them online.


Then there are her lies about Gwen Stefani and her husband.

Courtney's got a long list of celebrity feuds. She's been mean to Gwen Stefani - in April 2010, on Howard Stern's radio show, Courtney claims she slept with Gavin Rossdale while he was dating Gwen (but before they married).

And in January this year, she said that Gavin was "the brains behind" Gwen's L.A.M.B clothing empire, adding: "I kind of envisioned that me and Gavin Rossdale would end up on the French Riviera, like, taking tennis lessons and f**king our respective polo teachers."


Frances Bean Cobain turns 21 and we're obsessed with Courtney Love's meltdowns - Issy Sampson - 3am & Mirror Online

 

[tinydancer]

Oh and the accuser did what to the family pets?

'She killed the family pets': Frances Bean Cobain slams mum Courtney Love's bizarre behaviour in damning testimony

Talk about Mummy dearest! They even got a court order banning Courtney Love from going near her daughter's pet dog.

Oh yeah baby. The left wing whackos have just picked a champ to believe.

Backed by evidence from her male nanny and others the judge granted her request, as well as ordering the Hole singer stay away from her daughter's pet dog Uncle Fester.

And in sworn testimony uncovered by The Fix, Frances claimed her mother lived on drugs, was a conspiracy theorist and said the singer's hoarding caused the death of their family cat and dog.

In addition, she accused her mother of taking her to a confrontation at her ex-boyfriend James Barber's house.

She said: '(Love) has taken drugs for as long as I can remember.

'She basically exists now on...Xanax, Adderall, Sonata and Abilify, sugar and cigarettes

Oh and this ***** from hell has a mean streak a mile long. Quite nasty.

In one incident she said her mother dragged her to James Barber's house when she was 17, and that she sat in a taxi while her mother had a volcanic confrontation with her then boyfriend.

She said: 'She took me in a taxi to his house in the middle of the night, and from outside the house, in her bare feet, she screamed at him, threw rocks at the house, and threatened to burn his house down.

'His children were inside the house, but that did not stop my mother.'

Finally, she also slammed her mother's constant claims of people stealing money from them..

Frances said: 'My mother is obsessed with uncovering fraud and spends much of her day raging about the fraud that has been perpetrated on her and on me.

'She incessantly rages about her many theories relating to the supposed incidences of "fraud."


Even her own kid thinks she's nuts. To get a protection order against your mom. Well. What does this say to Love's character?

Frances Bean Cobain slammed Courtney Love's behaviour in restraining order testimony | Mail Online

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Courtney being nuts doesn't change what Ted is, or what he might have done to her. For all we know that kind of thing made her into who she now is...

 

[tinydancer]

Courtney being nuts doesn't change what Ted is, or what he might have done to her. For all we know that kind of thing made her into who she now is...

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Courtney being nuts doesn't change what Ted is, or what he might have done to her. For all we know that kind of thing made her into who she now is...

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Sexual abuse does that to people. Sorry.