TDS is expensive

You understand it's a memorial for JFK that he renamed, right?

How about if Biden renamed the Lincoln Memorial to the Biden-Lincoln Memorial center? You're telling me that you think that's fine and OK?
...talk about TDS
Why would xiden rename a statue of Lincoln after himself? What a senile idea
 
He was under no contract with The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. They won't get Jack Sh#t, in city or state courts in New York. Nobody in that city or state approves of the name of the Kennedy Center being high jacked by Donny and his family appointed board.
What does NY city or state have to do with any of this?
 
I did not know it was in DC, but he is not well liked in that town either.
If you have a contract to work for and organization, and they change organization under new management, you are not indentured to the new organization. You have not studied much Uniform Commercial Code, either. If changing organization, under new name and management, you had better make sure you get needed talent or critical employees to approve and agree to stay or work. Otherwise, you may not have a leg to stand on, as nobody has to work for you just because you take over. And, yes, I made straight "A"s in multiple semesters of Business Law. My instructor is now one of the judges, I mentioned on the thread where you didn't know Tennessee law.

BTW spell check is the one that changed highjacked to high jacked. I actually wanted to spell it hijacked. Right now as I type, highjacked has a red line under it.
The UCC and TN law have nothing to do with this either
 
The other musicians probably agreed not to do the show also.
If fans of the act(s) were going to be there, those fans should've been the first priority. If enemies are who come first with a person, that person will be lucky if anyone gives them the time of day in the right way. Country music has never been the most popular music at the Grammy awards show, and so therefore I salute anyone who is there to represent the format because if they don't do such a thing, there won't be any country music in the picture at all. What do I mean when pointing out such a thing? If those who walk away do their walking away because of what or who they are going to be in the presence of, they are ripping off not only themselves, but anyone who may be there to cheer them on. In other words, don't let what other people believe/support make you hesitate to contribute what you feel needs to have a presence at the barbecue as well.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. A barbecue would be pretty boring if everyone in attendance only ended up bringing the same kind of food or drinks anyway. Not everyone likes tea or lemonade. Some prefer soda over everything else that is out there to drink. Not everyone likes potato salad for a side dish. Some people prefer chips and dip, etc. Don't get me started on desert when there is cake, pie, cobbler, cookies, pudding, and brownies, etc. to pick from. :) :) :)
 
Last edited:
A musician canceled his gig at the Kennedy Center after he discovered President Trump put his name on it.
Now the Kennedy Center is suing him for a million dollars,, for breach of contract and damages.

Well, the musician was wrong to cancel his engagement so late. He has an obligation to consider. But likewise, I put a little blame on Trump too--- I get why he wants to name everything after himself and so often credits himself with his successes, but I'm not so sure I like his putting his name on things that are not wholly of his own creation. Maybe Trump should be a guy and just do good for things because he can without necessarily needing to take public credit for it.

It would not surprise me now if it is shown that Trump had no right to do this and his name is eventually removed. This silly kind of egotism just distracts from all of the great things he is really doing and plays right into the narrative of the democrats; it gives them an opportunity to change the topic away from all of the really horrible things they are really doing.
 
Actually he was under contract and the board of the center voted to change the name

The entity that he was under contest with still exist and he canceled it right before the show

He’s in breach and will need to pay for damages
New name, new management. I doubt he will have to pay.
 
The UCC and TN law have nothing to do with this either
Yes, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applies in Washington, DC, as it has been adopted in some form by all states and territories in the United States, including the District of Columbia. The UCC provides a standardized legal framework for commercial transactions.


Justia
 
Yes, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applies in Washington, DC, as it has been adopted in some form by all states and territories in the United States, including the District of Columbia. The UCC provides a standardized legal framework for commercial transactions.


Justia
The UCC doesn’t apply to this case. What would govern it is the contract to perform

 
The UCC doesn’t apply to this case. What would govern it is the contract to perform

That is informative, but does not cover this case. There are some people, some organizations, I might contract with, and be willing to perform for, yet, if the organization changed, the people changed, the situation changed, I might quit, on the spot, and if I have not started to perform, would certainly refuse the new organization, as not wanting be to associated with the new organization. You will see more of this refusal to be associated, with The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.

Going forward, those that contract with that organization, know what they are getting into, and who they are agreeing to contract with, so standard rules of contracting will be in effect, whether it be common law or regulated under Uniform Commercial Code. My studies in college under Judge Middlebrook, were primarily on contract law under UCC, with very little discussion or consideration of common law, as it can very more widely, whereas Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted more widely, even in states such as Louisiana after 1990. If you think, Chief Judge Milton Lee, or appellate Srikanth "Sri" Srinivasan (both appointed by Barack Obama) are likely to look on this performer as an indentured servant to the Trump organization, you are most likely mistaken, in my humble opinion.
1767034221865.webp

1767034287509.webp
 
That is informative, but does not cover this case. There are some people, some organizations, I might contract with, and be willing to perform for, yet, if the organization changed, the people changed, the situation changed, I might quit, on the spot, and if I have not started to perform, would certainly refuse the new organization, as not wanting be to associated with the new organization. You will see more of this refusal to be associated, with The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.

Going forward, those that contract with that organization, know what they are getting into, and who they are agreeing to contract with, so standard rules of contracting will be in effect, whether it be common law or regulated under Uniform Commercial Code. My studies in college under Judge Middlebrook, were primarily on contract law under UCC, with very little discussion or consideration of common law, as it can very more widely, whereas Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted more widely, even in states such as Louisiana after 1990. If you think, Chief Judge Milton Lee, or appellate Srikanth "Sri" Srinivasan (both appointed by Barack Obama) are likely to look on this performer as an indentured servant to the Trump organization, you are most likely mistaken, in my humble opinion.
View attachment 1199198
View attachment 1199200
Are you just stupid?
 
That is informative, but does not cover this case. There are some people, some organizations, I might contract with, and be willing to perform for, yet, if the organization changed, the people changed, the situation changed, I might quit, on the spot, and if I have not started to perform, would certainly refuse the new organization, as not wanting be to associated with the new organization. You will see more of this refusal to be associated, with The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.

Going forward, those that contract with that organization, know what they are getting into, and who they are agreeing to contract with, so standard rules of contracting will be in effect, whether it be common law or regulated under Uniform Commercial Code. My studies in college under Judge Middlebrook, were primarily on contract law under UCC, with very little discussion or consideration of common law, as it can very more widely, whereas Uniform Commercial Code has been adopted more widely, even in states such as Louisiana after 1990. If you think, Chief Judge Milton Lee, or appellate Srikanth "Sri" Srinivasan (both appointed by Barack Obama) are likely to look on this performer as an indentured servant to the Trump organization, you are most likely mistaken, in my humble opinion.
View attachment 1199198
View attachment 1199200
LOL So you believe "I think Trump is a poopyhead" defense to a breach of contract action is a winner? LOL
 
Yes, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applies in Washington, DC, as it has been adopted in some form by all states and territories in the United States, including the District of Columbia. The UCC provides a standardized legal framework for commercial transactions.
UCC is for the sale of goods.
 
LOL So you believe "I think Trump is a poopyhead" defense to a breach of contract action is a winner? LOL
No, but the "I didn't sign up to work for that sonovabitch or his family. If I had known that was going to become the deal, I would have booked another gig", very well might work. Management changed, and he did not agree to work for them, as against his principles.
 
15th post
He was under no contract with The Donald J. Trump and John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. They won't get Jack Sh#t, in Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Nobody in that city approves of the name of the Kennedy Center being high jacked by Donny and his family appointed board.
You realize the only trumps on the board are him and his wife? First ladies are automatically put on the board. So is the president.
Doesnt matter what DC thinks. The fed gov owns it.
Changing a name doesnt void a contract unless there was a provision in the contract.
The only thing you got right in this post was the name. Good job.
 
No, but the "I didn't sign up to work for that sonovabitch or his family. If I had known that was going to become the deal, I would have booked another gig", very well might work. Management changed, and he did not agree to work for them, as against his principles.
More lies, comrade.
 
I did not know it was in DC, but he is not well liked in that town either.
If you have a contract to work for and organization, and they change organization under new management, you are not indentured to the new organization. You have not studied much Uniform Commercial Code, either. If changing organization, under new name and management, you had better make sure you get needed talent or critical employees to approve and agree to stay or work. Otherwise, you may not have a leg to stand on, as nobody has to work for you just because you take over. And, yes, I made straight "A"s in multiple semesters of Business Law. My instructor is now one of the judges, I mentioned on the thread where you didn't know Tennessee law.

BTW spell check is the one that changed highjacked to high jacked. I actually wanted to spell it hijacked. Right now as I type, highjacked has a red line under it.
Wrong
 
Back
Top Bottom