management at the center is always changing, particularly with a change in administration. He certainly did know that it was more than a distinct possibility that Trump was going to win. Think of it this way, What if a Jew was appointed President of the Center? Do you think a performer can cancel their contract because it's "against his principles" to work for a Jew?
It depends on the contract and if there is provisions for assignment.
We need some sort of standards for mods who post.
They let hillbillies like you post, so anybody is pretty free to post. I post as a member, same as anybody else. It was the only way, they could get me to accept the gig. They came to me. I didn't come to them. Wouldn't even answer the PM for almost two weeks.
They need standards for mods who posts. Going around spreading BS shouldnt be accepted. By the moonbats? Sure. But a mod?.... We can do better.
Seen anything in the Rules for posting to support your opinion? No.
My post clearly implied the lack of such rules and standards, dingus. Are you drunk today? Good grief.
What does that even mean?
Who would want to perform at the Kennedy Center? Trump’s cronies have been responsible for performers being heckled.
It means,
www.nbcnews.com
You realize the president is who selects members, right? It has always been that way. smhIt means,
Trump appointed allies to the Kennedy Center's board after taking office, which allowed him to gain significant control over the center, including being voted as chairman.BBC
symphony.org
Trump's handpicked Kennedy Center board votes to rename it the 'Trump-Kennedy Center'
The board's decision to add Trump's name could face legal hurdles, as the law creating the center prohibits renaming the building.
Performing at the Kennedy Center was indeed considered a significant honor, as the Kennedy Center Honors celebrated lifetime contributions to American culture through the performing arts. It was originally envisioned as The National Cultural Center, becoming the Kennedy Center after the time of the assassination of John F Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, breaking ground for it in 1964. Now, not so much an honor, performing there.
When a company changes its name, its entity status remains unchanged, which is critical for the validity of existing contracts. The legal identity of a corporation is distinct from its name, meaning a name change does not alter the company’s obligations or rights. This principle, rooted in corporate personhood, ensures that contracts under the old name remain binding. Legal precedents and statutory provisions, such as the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the United States, support this continuity. Courts consistently uphold that a name change does not impact the substance of a contractual relationship.
At least two people here, have said UCC does not apply, so I posted from common laws standpoint, where performance contracts, might require agreement after changes in management and name. One of these is true, and will be upheld or denied in court. But, the court in this case, as I have pointed out, will be under Obama appointed chief judges and appellate judges, with jury selected from Washington, DC, where Trump in general has 55% disapproval. I do not see trump having a positive outcome on this, if it even gets to trial. What I say, really does not matter, nor does your best guess, as we do not live in DC, but that is where it will be decided.
