No, you got nothing. If you had you wouldn't be spouting this garbage that shows your jealousy that there are rich and there are poor. That has been true since the beginning of time. It isn't going to change because of your whining and crying. Get off of your butt and make yourself more valuable and you too could become one of the top 1%.
Jon's gone down disparity avenue CA........thinking the great unwashed deserve a break .......libs always place blame on anything or anyone .......for what they themselves are guilty of
Low-income households often pay a higher percentage of their income in state and local taxes, particularly sales and excise taxes, making these systems highly regressive. Poorer households spend a larger share of their income on necessities, leading to a higher tax burden compared to wealthier residents, particularly in states without income taxes.
publicintegrity.org
LMAOROG, I lived and worked through that period and I studied and improved my skills and gained a comfortable retirement. While I am certainly not part of the 1%, I also don't hold any jealousy or animosity because they have been successful. It has been a symbiotic relationship, my employers were more successful and as a result, so was I. Cry me a river, parasite.
So are you willing to pay your $112,490 portion of the national debt? You enjoyed the benefits. I eagerly await your response.
Thank you. In WA there is no income tax, but working families get a cash benefit as much as $1,400 per year because they lived here and didn't earn as much as others. Wealth redistribution?
LMAOROG, Except he didn't, by much! He increased taxes 11 times AND increased SS taxes which hit the workers
- Tax Structure Change: While the top rate was slashed from 70% to 50% (and later to 28% in 1986), the bottom rate was also initially reduced. However, it is noted that in 1986, the lowest tax rate was increased from 11% to 15%, which was a departure from the 1981 cuts.
What we learned from Reagan's tax cuts | Brookings
David Wessel looks at what happened at Ronald Reagan cut tax rates in the '80s.www.brookings.edu
President Ronald Reagan's administration significantly boosted executive stock options and stock-based compensation, primarily through the Economic Recovery and Tax Act of 1981, which reintroduced incentive stock options (ISOs) taxed at favorable capital gains rates. Further, in 1982, the SEC introduced Rule 10b-18, enabling easier stock buybacks and fueling stock-driven pay.
So are you willing to pay 47% of your income to the feds? 56%? Why do you figure that they should pay those cockamamie rates and you don't? Because they have more? SMH. Run along commie troll.
I didn't say anything about AL. Do you have a problem reading. WA doesn't have a resource other than OTHER TAXPAYERS that they are redistributing the wealth of. Try again, parasite.
