Take note of how the left attempts to conflate “IMMIGRANTS” and “ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS”

Actually, about 50% of them would.

This is why Miller the Reptile dismantled the system. Because knowing half of them would be approved, just making them wait forever seemed like the better option.



Guy, if you are such a white trash loser that someone with no money, no connections, and a limited grasp of the English Language is going to take your job, that's on you.

1% if we follow the law.
2% if we expand the criteria.

Educate yourself
 
Guy, if you are such a white trash loser that someone with no money, no connections, and a limited grasp of the English Language is going to take your job, that's on you.

It isn’t about taking my job. It is about sucking the country dry why the “rich” pay for them. You don’t care because you aren’t part of the “rich”. You want people like them to pay for you and your childish ideas.
 
It isn’t about taking my job. It is about sucking the country dry why the “rich” pay for them. You don’t care because you aren’t part of the “rich”. You want people like them to pay for you and your childish ideas.
“Sucking the country dry” to you means “maybe I can’t afford another vacation home”.

“Sucking the country dry” to me means saddling a future generation with crushing public debt.
 
Annual reminder that Dems made a bipartisan bill to improve the asylum system and make it work faster and better.

But that bill was blown up by Trump.
 
“Sucking the country dry” to you means “maybe I can’t afford another vacation home”.

“Sucking the country dry” to me means saddling a future generation with crushing public debt.

I am all for cutting spending. The issue is that we wouldn't agree on what to cut so I say let’s cut x percentage across the board. The answer isn’t to take more and more money from those have done well.
 
.

Fact is, we could absorb millions of people with no problem. Every consumer is also a producer, so immigrants are good for the economy.
Islamocrat Cult lies.


Illegals are a net drain on society of $150,000,000,000 per year.

 
I am all for cutting spending. The issue is that we wouldn't agree on what to cut so I say let’s cut x percentage across the board. The answer isn’t to take more and more money from those have done well.

Nope, make the rich pay their fair share.

The thing is, most of the 7 Trillion we spend we can't touch, and a lot of it is going to increase.

1.5 Trillion on Social Security
1 Trillion on Defense
1 Trillion on Medicare
600 Billion on Medicaid
400 billion on Veterans benefits
1 Trillion on interest on the debt.

So we ALREADY have 5.5 Trillion that essentially is non-negotiable. (At least politically).
 
I never know what the 'left' is except that some use the word as if it means something. Try instead to be specific or at least try. Labels are a sign of ignorance.
 
I am all for cutting spending. The issue is that we wouldn't agree on what to cut so I say let’s cut x percentage across the board. The answer isn’t to take more and more money from those have done well.
The answer is both, but you’ll never admit it.

You only want to cut spending because you know it won’t affect you in the slightest.

Well, maybe it will if Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement drop 30%.
 
It’s always refreshing to hear the rich talk about the terrible hardships they’ll have to face if tax rates go up.

I mean, giving up the dream of owning multiple houses? Might as well be torture.
 
The answer is both, but you’ll never admit it.

You only want to cut spending because you know it won’t affect you in the slightest.

Well, maybe it will if Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement drop 30%.

I don’t think you are aware of the penalties imposed on the “rich”. Medicare reimbursement is one. Those with a certain amount of income don’t qualify for a discounted rate, despite paying into the system their entire lives. That is just one of MANY.

Maybe the 50% of people that don’t pay any federal income tax should get some skin in the game. Every thought of that?
 
15th post
It’s always refreshing to hear the rich talk about the terrible hardships they’ll have to face if tax rates go up.

I mean, giving up the dream of owning multiple houses? Might as well be torture.

Your display of wealth envy is telling
also pathetic.
 
Back
Top Bottom