Supreme Court Says Church Bans UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

ChemEngineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
2,474
Reaction score
1,772
Points
1,940
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
 

jillian

Princess
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
84,493
Reaction score
16,384
Points
2,220
Location
The Other Side of Paradise
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists
 

JackOfNoTrades

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Messages
9,068
Reaction score
7,685
Points
1,940
Location
Granite State
Unfortunate result when rule by the court is done from a religious and political perspective instead of ceding to the science and public health.
Common sense...out the window we go!
 

ReinyDays

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
5,530
Reaction score
2,129
Points
210
Location
State of Jefferson
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists
I think it was the New York case where the judges ruled that the government can't specifically single out churches for these meeting limits ... when weighed against the types of assembly that was listed as essential ... acupuncture clinics and beauty salons ... if you want to limit people gathering, you have to limit ALL gatherings ... strictly illegal to target religion for this prohibition ...

If California and New York are serious ... they'll shut down places equally, without regard to race, ethnicity, religion, sex, or the rest of the protected classes ...
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,704
Reaction score
5,562
Points
215
Seems a ruling based upon many aspects of the Constitution. Religious freedom and equal protection being the two biggest ones.

But again I will note. That just because you can do something doesn't mean you should but these kinds of questions do not answered and addressed.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,704
Reaction score
5,562
Points
215
Unfortunate result when rule by the court is done from a religious and political perspective instead of ceding to the science and public health.
Common sense...out the window we go!
It was ruled on as it pertains to the Constitution.
 

JackOfNoTrades

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2019
Messages
9,068
Reaction score
7,685
Points
1,940
Location
Granite State
Unfortunate result when rule by the court is done from a religious and political perspective instead of ceding to the science and public health.
Common sense...out the window we go!
It was ruled on as it pertains to the Constitution.
Again. Out with common sense. Viewed as a static document and not the living, breathing doc a lot of people think it was meant to be.
I'm not arguing the strict legal interpretation. As long as we agree that all the sick and dead resulting were sacrificed in the name of said document.
I'm sure it will be a great comfort to the families of those lost.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,704
Reaction score
5,562
Points
215
Unfortunate result when rule by the court is done from a religious and political perspective instead of ceding to the science and public health.
Common sense...out the window we go!
It was ruled on as it pertains to the Constitution.
Again. Out with common sense. Viewed as a static document and not the living, breathing doc a lot of people think it was meant to be.
I'm not arguing the strict legal interpretation. As long as we agree that all the sick and dead resulting were sacrificed in the name of said document.
I'm sure it will be a great comfort to the families of those lost.
If you are going to simply dismiss things you don't like that can be done to any of it.

As I noted, just because you can do something doesn't mean you should but no one should be able to ignore our Constitutional protections.
 

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,182
Reaction score
6,504
Points
1,130
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
the only thing is these courts make these rulings but there is never any action taken against these criminal governors. a judge did the same thing with facist whitmere and correct me if I am wrong,but isnt she still the governor there?
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,704
Reaction score
5,562
Points
215
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
the only thing is these courts make these rulings but there is never any action taken against these criminal governors. a judge did the same thing with facist whitmere and correct me if I am wrong,but isnt she still the governor there?
The courts smacked down Trump more than once. It happens. It's why we have the system we do.

Are you arguing that when a politician gets ruled against by the courts they should be removed? OK if so. It would have saved us a lot of headaches with this last election.
 

Yousaidwhat

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2016
Messages
10,051
Reaction score
3,237
Points
2,065
Location
Orbiting the 3rd rock
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists
WTF is a christifacist?
 
Last edited:

LA RAM FAN

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
37,182
Reaction score
6,504
Points
1,130
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
the only thing is these courts make these rulings but there is never any action taken against these criminal governors. a judge did the same thing with facist whitmere and correct me if I am wrong,but isnt she still the governor there?
The courts smacked down Trump more than once. It happens. It's why we have the system we do.

Are you arguing that when a politician gets ruled against by the courts they should be removed? OK if so. It would have saved us a lot of headaches with this last election.
uh you are evading the post charlie. apples and oranges,we have the most corrupt court system in the world. again WHY make these rulings if nothing ever is done about them? :rolleyes-41:

Reminds me of the double stanard the NFL has in theory hypocrisy.they made these rules that nfl teams have to follow if they want to leave their city to move to another city.well the raiders and chargers violated those rules yet they were aloowed to leave. whhy makes those rules if they are not followed? same here,WHY have judges make these rulings if no action is ever taken.

anybody with a pea brain can see the so fucking obvious that gruesome newsome is the next hitler,the most evil fucking man on the planet same with whitmere. only an idiot would not be aware of their corruption how they keep shitting on the constititution.:rolleyes-41:
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,704
Reaction score
5,562
Points
215
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
the only thing is these courts make these rulings but there is never any action taken against these criminal governors. a judge did the same thing with facist whitmere and correct me if I am wrong,but isnt she still the governor there?
The courts smacked down Trump more than once. It happens. It's why we have the system we do.

Are you arguing that when a politician gets ruled against by the courts they should be removed? OK if so. It would have saved us a lot of headaches with this last election.
uh you are evading the post charlie. apples and oranges,we have the most corrupt court system in the world. again WHY makes these rulings if nothing ever is done about them? anybody with a pea brain can see the so fucking obvious that groesome newsome is the next hitler,the most evil fucking man on the planet same with whitmere. only an idiot would not be aware of their corruption how they keep shitting on the constititution.:rolleyes-41:
Something was done. The restrictions have been overturned.

P.S. you avoided my question.
 
OP
ChemEngineer

ChemEngineer

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
2,474
Reaction score
1,772
Points
1,940
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists
Jillian, there is a Pew Survey that shows Leftists admit having more mental problems than conservatives/Christians. You exhibit that very symptom of mental illness by spewing your venom and hatred.
Women have more mental problems than men. The younger they are, the more mental problems. If you search, you can find the graph. I won't bother to repost it here but get help before you go transsexual. They have a very high suicide rate and high clinical depression.
You don't even know how to spell "fascists," poor thing.
 

Dogmaphobe

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
17,052
Reaction score
8,107
Points
1,295
Location
Or uh gun
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists

What is a facist? If you meant FASCIST, that would be Newsome.

THat is why the court struck down his attack against freedom of religion and freedom of assembly.
 

hadit

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
26,763
Reaction score
5,164
Points
280
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Gov. Newsom’s Indoor Worship Bans


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday against California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) restrictions on indoor worship services, agreeing with religious groups they are unconstitutional.

The High Court granted a petition from Harvest Rock Church in Pasadena that sought to overturn a lower court’s ruling in favor of Newsom’s restrictions.

The ruling cited the Supreme Court’s decision last week in a similar case in which it ruled in favor of faith groups that challenged New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s (D) worship restrictions.

-------------------------------------

Gruesome Newsom is a Leftist idiot. Even wacky Californians are circulating a petition to recall him.
That isn’t really what it said. And the court doesn’t generally rule on moot matters. But that’s what happens when you stack the court with christifacists
Thank goodness that didn't happen. That might scare some already paranoid people.
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,144
Reaction score
1,528
Points
140
Location
alaska, usa
Unfortunate result when rule by the court is done from a religious and political perspective instead of ceding to the science and public health.
Common sense...out the window we go!
That's quite the circumcision district. I'm not sure it's a church at all.
WTF is a christifacist?
The religion of Cæsar Augustus, King Herod, and Pontius Pilate ...
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top