So you don't believe in Climate Change? Neither do these scientists...

[ding]

I'm 79 years old but I don't see the relevance of age...as the point I was making was much colder temperatures is according to climate change evangelistas, ....climate change is the cause...
The increase could be tied to human caused climate change.
What has been proven is that a warming event destabilized the polar vortex above the North Pole dislodging the arctic air mass to the Deep South.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9167

A warming event in the arctic might have affected the polar vortex but it’s a leap of faith to believe the warming event in the polar region was due to man made global warming.

 

[BlindBoo]

I am 57;years old yes I understand the winters are cold always have been

What? Winter is forecast to be cold? Again? 63 years in a row!

 

[Wyatt earp]

What? Winter is forecast to be cold? Again? 63 years in a row!

McCall Idaho

 

[healthmyths]

A warming event in the arctic might have affected the polar vortex but it’s a leap of faith to believe the warming event in the polar region was due to man made global warming.

Oh I agree with you! The point I was making climatechangevangelistas will link ANYTHING even colder weather to be man made. I'm a realist and there are some issues that climatechangevangelistas have a point but to link EVERYTHING, i.e. cold weather to an issue that's it's core is "global warming" is A reach.
I've still to get an answer from climatechangevangelistas how come there is 36.4 gigaton of Co2 emissions when 3 trillion trees absorb 48 lbs / year of Co2 or 72 gigaton of Co2.
Even when 10.9 billion tons of Co2 part of the world emissions from rotten wood/leaves, is included in the 36.4 billion tons of Co2, that still doesn't explain how trees absorb all that as well as 36.4 gigaton of manmade emissions.

COâ emissions

How much CO₂ does the world emit? Which countries emit the most?

ourworldindata.org

 

[ReinyDays]

But according this the early cold weather is because...
A study released in September(2021) found that the cold outbreak is linked to a stretching of the polar vortex.

The increase could be tied to human caused climate change. What has been proven is that a warming event destabilized the polar vortex above the North Pole dislodging the arctic air mass to the Deep South.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9167

Cold outbreaks stretch the polar vortex ... not the other way around ... you "paper" is behind a paywall ... could you please read through the conclusions section and tell us what the authors states there ... especially the part about "what has been proven is that a warming event destabilized the polar vortex" ... I'd like to see that proof if you don't mind ...

The cold-snap event in Texas back in 2021 was weather ... not climate ... this happens many times in any 100-year period ... infamously the morning of the Challenger incident ... and this is far better modeled with Rossby Waves, which are around ten times the size and energy content ... the SPV sits very high in the atmosphere, much closer to space than the Earth's surface, and that means very low mass and very little effect on weather ...

 

[ReinyDays]

Oh I agree with you! The point I was making climatechangevangelistas will link ANYTHING even colder weather to be man made. I'm a realist and there are some issues that climatechangevangelistas have a point but to link EVERYTHING, i.e. cold weather to an issue that's it's core is "global warming" is A reach.
I've still to get an answer from climatechangevangelistas how come there is 36.4 gigaton of Co2 emissions when 3 trillion trees absorb 48 lbs / year of Co2 or 72 gigaton of Co2.
Even when 10.9 billion tons of Co2 part of the world emissions from rotten wood/leaves, is included in the 36.4 billion tons of Co2, that still doesn't explain how trees absorb all that as well as 36.4 gigaton of manmade emissions.

COâ emissions

How much CO₂ does the world emit? Which countries emit the most?

ourworldindata.org

If we emit 36 gigatons of carbon dioxide ... where does it go? ... we're only reading half that amount at the Hawai'i Observatory where we get the Keeling Curve ... no one knows where it goes ... too funny ...

 

[ding]

If we emit 36 gigatons of carbon dioxide ... where does it go? ... we're only reading half that amount at the Hawai'i Observatory where we get the Keeling Curve ... no one knows where it goes ... too funny ...

I suspect it’s primarily going into the ocean.

 

[ReinyDays]

I suspect it’s primarily going into the ocean.

... and the biology within ...

 

[ding]

... and the biology within ...

Good point.

 

[ReinyDays]

Good point.

Acidification of the Oceans ... deoxyribonucleic acid ...

 

[ding]

Acidification of the Oceans ... deoxyribonucleic acid ...

Bugs love carbon.

 

[ReinyDays]

Bugs love carbon.

Photosynthesis takes in carbon dioxide and returns oxygen ... respiration takes in oxygen and returns carbon dioxide ...

Our atmosphere is 22% oxygen, 0.0004% carbon dioxide ... so who's winning? ... photosynthesis or respiration ...

How much energy? ... what comes in solar radiation is converted into chemical energy, not kinetic energy, thermometers won't register this ...

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

But according this the early cold weather is because...
A study released in September(2021) found that the cold outbreak is linked to a stretching of the polar vortex.

The increase could be tied to human caused climate change. What has been proven is that a warming event destabilized the polar vortex above the North Pole dislodging the arctic air mass to the Deep South.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9167

Al's Little Elves

Have you hugged your polar vortex today? It misses you; and without your warm and fuzzy embrace, it might become depressed and bipolar.

 

[westwall]

A simple experiment on global warming | Royal Society Open Science

A simple experiment has been developed to demonstrate the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas in the Earth's atmosphere. A miniature electric resistance heating element was placed inside an inflatable balloon. The balloon was filled with ...

royalsocietypublishing.org

A simple FAULTY experiment.

 

[healthmyths]

A warming event in the arctic might have affected the polar vortex but it’s a leap of faith to believe the warming event in the polar region was due to man made global warming.

I agree 100% with you! My sarcastic comment about "polar vortex" is that NOW the climatestas think warming is due to man made efforts! And my point has always been... the attached material shows points the biased MSM favoring climate change haven't told us i.e. that the 1.5° F increase since 1880 when first tracking temperatures is MAN-made errors!
Reading a thermometer in -30°to 120° above is very hard as is reading that. Then copying and re-copying several times handwritten is man-made prone errors. Plus as they admit Urban heat zones, i.e. most of the readings done in that environment versus leaving out 12% of land mass... just too many man-made errors in assuming a 1.53° increase!

 

[ding]

I agree 100% with you! My sarcastic comment about "polar vortex" is that NOW the climatestas think warming is due to man made efforts! And my point has always been... the attached material shows points the biased MSM favoring climate change haven't told us i.e. that the 1.5° F increase since 1880 when first tracking temperatures is MAN-made errors!
Reading a thermometer in -30°to 120° above is very hard as is reading that. Then copying and re-copying several times handwritten is man-made prone errors. Plus as they admit Urban heat zones, i.e. most of the readings done in that environment versus leaving out 12% of land mass... just too many man-made errors in assuming a 1.53° increase!
View attachment 727917

I was with you every step of the way. I was just adding on.

 

[Crick]

Pretty astounding that we could have 5 pages full of response posts without a single person addressing the "study" on which the OP is entirely based.

https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/FDU-Poll-Climate-Scientists-Heartland-Institute-2022.pdf

Just assume I've made the obvious comments about Heartland as a reliable, objective, scientifically valid source and what can be done with a survey and its analyses if someone is looking for a particular outcome.

 

[dudmuck]

Photosynthesis takes in carbon dioxide and returns oxygen ... respiration takes in oxygen and returns carbon dioxide ...

Our atmosphere is 22% oxygen, 0.0004% carbon dioxide ... so who's winning? ... photosynthesis or respiration ...

How much energy? ... what comes in solar radiation is converted into chemical energy, not kinetic energy, thermometers won't register this ...

looks like respiration is winning.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

looks like respiration is winning.

$76 trillion!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So if trees absorb 72 billion tons of Co2 but Co2 emissions are 36.4 billion tons, What is the problem?

Your weak math skills.