So the FCC chair is threatening networks that broadcast unfavorable news

Social media deciding against complying with requests is documented in court cases and testimony in those cases.

We’ve seen lots of threats from the Trump administration.

Do you expect the threatened to come out and say they made decisions based on those threats? That’s absurd.

You demand an unattainable level of specificity and proof to believe your own view which has no such level of specificity and proof. It demonstrates a dishonest in your argument.
No it isn’t because nothing has changed, the media is still going after Trump, the FCC is doing nothing and you have no evidence of social media going against anything any administration has asked. You have a big zero and are dancing around a question.

So you have nothing evidence of your accusations, thanks.
 
No it isn’t because nothing has changed, the media is still going after Trump, the FCC is doing nothing and you have no evidence of social media going against anything any administration has asked. You have a big zero and are dancing around a question.

So you have nothing evidence of your accusations, thanks.

Moreover, the record shows that in a surprising number of cases, social media executives pushed back against government demands to remove or demote problematic messages. Indeed, according to the court, the FBI had only a 50 percent success rate in having alleged election disinformation removed or downgraded. This suggests that governmental anti-misinformation efforts might be less effective than their proponents hope or their detractors fear.
 

Moreover, the record shows that in a surprising number of cases, social media executives pushed back against government demands to remove or demote problematic messages. Indeed, according to the court, the FBI had only a 50 percent success rate in having alleged election disinformation removed or downgraded. This suggests that governmental anti-misinformation efforts might be less effective than their proponents hope or their detractors fear.
As they should

Remember when your vote tried to estimate a min of truth? I do. Fascism always fails

 

Moreover, the record shows that in a surprising number of cases, social media executives pushed back against government demands to remove or demote problematic messages. Indeed, according to the court, the FBI had only a 50 percent success rate in having alleged election disinformation removed or downgraded. This suggests that governmental anti-misinformation efforts might be less effective than their proponents hope or their detractors fear.

Explain why the Biden administration was in bed with former Twitter and Facebook. If what the article claim is true, then why did Biden want to open the office of the ministry of truth?
 
As they should

Remember when your vote tried to estimate a min of truth? I do. Fascism always fails

Did you find the FCC on the list of executive branch departments yet?
 
Explain why the Biden administration was in bed with former Twitter and Facebook. If what the article claim is true, then why did Biden want to open the office of the ministry of truth?
They were trying to protect American lives that were put at risk by disinformation about disease.
 
Did you find the FCC on the list of executive branch departments yet?
No, it’s a commission created by Congress to enforce federal law

Did you find a place where they were independent of the Constitution?


Nope
 
They were trying to protect American lives that were put at risk by disinformation about disease.
Interesting. You believe government was looking after the people’s interest then but immediately ceased to trust the government after Trump sworn in.
 
No, it’s a commission created by Congress to enforce federal law

Did you find a place where they were independent of the Constitution?


Nope
So it’s not a part of an executive branch department?

Then by the definition you provided, it’s independent.
 
Interesting. You believe government was looking after the people’s interest then but immediately ceased to trust the government after Trump sworn in.
I judge people by their actions. Trump doesn’t deserve an ounce of trust.
 
I judge people by their actions. Trump doesn’t deserve an ounce of trust.
Whatever rows your boat. I prefer a loudmouth overload hyperbole president than the one who wanted to open the office of the ministry of truth just so the people are only able to hear one version.
 
Whatever rows your boat. I prefer a loudmouth overload hyperbole president than the one who wanted to open the office of the ministry of truth just so the people are only able to hear one version.
Trump has done far further to suppress speech than anyone even accused Biden of doing.

You were misled about the purpose and scope of the disinformation board.

Because you were subject to disinformation.

 
Trump has done far further to suppress speech than anyone even accused Biden of doing.

You were misled about the purpose and scope of the disinformation board.

Because you were subject to disinformation.


Then why did Biden shut it down?
 
Trump has done far further to suppress speech than anyone even accused Biden of doing.

You were misled about the purpose and scope of the disinformation board.

Because you were subject to disinformation.


Really? Did Trump admin hold secret meetings with social media companies and lay out a plan who to ban or suspend?

No country can claim democratic and then said we need an office of the ministry of truth.
 
15th post
Really? Did Trump admin hold secret meetings with social media companies and lay out a plan who to ban or suspend?

No country can claim democratic and then said we need an office of the ministry of truth.
Nope. He openly threatens to use government to punish broadcasters who host speech he doesn’t like. Way worse than anything you accused Biden of doing.
 
Nope. He openly threatens to use government to punish broadcasters who host speech he doesn’t like. Way worse than anything you accused Biden of doing.
Still gotta go through the judicial process but not for the collusion. Biden administration can say social media did it, not us.

See the difference?
 
Strange fellow for having absolutely no qualms about media spreading misi

Strange fellow for having absolutely no qualms about media spreading misinformation.
How many times have I caught you spreading lies, only to prove you wrong and see you disappear entirely?

You absolutely love misinformation. You gobble it up and ask for more.

Misinformation is used by our enemies to weaken us and if the government isn’t thinking about this, then it’s not defending the nation.
 
Still gotta go through the judicial process but not for the collusion. Biden administration can say social media did it, not us.

See the difference
Nope. Trump can pull someone’s license if he wants. He doesn’t need permission to do so.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom