So the FCC chair is threatening networks that broadcast unfavorable news

Dangerous speech shouldn't be considered free.
That's what Biden was stopping.
Drinking gasoline, will cure cancer?
Should that be allowed?
Who said drinking gasoline would cure cancer. And I was talking about the general “war” on “misinformation”. YouTube, Facebook and twitter were censoring people at the behest of the White House.
 
Who said drinking gasoline would cure cancer. And I was talking about the general “war” on “misinformation”. YouTube, Facebook and twitter were censoring people at the behest of the White House.
*To save people's lies during a pandemic of a novel virus.

*To preserve democracy

I get that this is not enough, for a free speech absolutist. I do. I understand why and, really, kind of agree.

But in both cases, there was an imminent threat. So they broke the glass. I get that, too.

The tags are probably a better solution. When it comes to certain things, some public safety issues being one of them, the unsupported garbage and lies should get tagged. Codify it, then we don't have people just spitballing and crossing lines in the sand.
 
*To save people's lies during a pandemic of a novel virus.

*To preserve democracy

I get that this is not enough, for a free speech absolutist. I do. I understand why and, really, kind of agree.

But in both cases, there was an imminent threat. So they broke the glass. I get that, too.

The tags are probably a better solution. When it comes to certain things, some public safety issues being one of them, the unsupported garbage and lies should get tagged. Codify it, then we don't have people just spitballing and crossing lines in the sand.
It wasn’t only just Covid. They suppressed information about the hunter laptop as well as election fraud claims.
 
It wasn’t only just Covid. They suppressed information about the hunter laptop as well as election fraud claims.
Biden couldn’t have done that, he wasn’t in office.
 
It wasn’t only just Covid.
Not saying it was. I was, however, referring to covid and election fraud lies, specifically.

Also not saying those other examples should not be considered. I think all of it together makes a case for finding and codifying a better solution.

Like, tags.
 
The laptop story was “suppressed” before he took office. When it broke.

You are correct. In that instance, social media took it upon themselves to censor that particular story. But Zuckerberg admitted that bidens White House pressured them to censor stories about Covid and election fraud.
 
Fox News is a cable station


It’s not a broadcast network


But of the problem here is you dembots don’t even know what we are discussing
This is your excuse so you can hide from ignoring (aand dodging admitting) that you endorse Trump facism.
 
15th post
This is your excuse so you can hide from ignoring (aand dodging admitting) that you endorse Trump facism.
enforcing federal law is not fascism. It's weird you think Federal Communications Act of 1934 is fascist.
 
Back
Top Bottom