Huh? Other admins didn’t enforce federal law? What?Threats of force is the same as force.
Carr is threatening government force. The same can’t be said about other administrations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Huh? Other admins didn’t enforce federal law? What?Threats of force is the same as force.
Carr is threatening government force. The same can’t be said about other administrations.
Others did not have have to face the dishonesty and distortions from the mediaThreats of force is the same as force.
Carr is threatening government force. The same can’t be said about other administrations.
HAHAHA... Talk about turd polishingHey dipshit. You have to show intentional distortion.
Differences of opinion and errors are not actionable
Cable was in 50%-55% of all homes in 1987. Democrats tried to pass a bill to keep the doctrine going and limit freedom of speech, Reagan vetoed the bill. We don’t need a Fairness Doctrine, plenty of opinions everywhere.Rabid Right Radio had not made it's mark when Raygun scraped the Fairness Doctrine. Scraping it was one of the reasons for RRR's ascension.
Why did we have it. No cable!
"American thought and American politics will be largely at the mercy of those who operate these stations, for publicity is the most powerful weapon that can be wielded in a republic. And when such a weapon is placed in the hands of one person, or a single selfish group is permitted to either tacitly or otherwise acquire ownership or dominate these broadcasting stations throughout the country, then woe be to those who dare to differ with them. It will be impossible to compete with them in reaching the ears of the American people."
— Rep. Luther Johnson (D.-Texas), in the debate that preceded the Radio Act of 1927
A license permits broadcasting, but the licensee has no constitutional right to be the one who holds the license or to monopolize a…frequency to the exclusion of his fellow citizens. There is nothing in the First Amendment which prevents the Government from requiring a licensee to share his frequency with others…. It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
— U.S. Supreme Court, upholding the constitutionality of the Fairness Doctrine in Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 1969.
Because of the eclectic nature of Cable and now Streaming News, most. if not all, of which are not broadcast networks.
I don't we need it back. But here is some real history about it
![]()
The Fairness Doctrine: How We Lost It and Why We Need It Back
American thought and American politics will be largely at the mercy of those who operate these stations, for publicity is the most powerful weapon that can be wielded in a republic. And when such a…sisyphuslitmag.org
Eventually the doctrine was deleted by a 4-0 bipartisan vote at the FCC.Cable was in 50%-55% of all homes in 1987. Democrats tried to pass a bill to keep the doctrine going and limit freedom of speech, Reagan vetoed the bill. We don’t need a Fairness Doctrine, plenty of opinions everywhere.
Trump distorts everything, so he’s hardly able to tell what is and isn’t true.Others did not have have to face the dishonesty and distortions from the media
Dems think enforcing federal law is a threatOthers did not have have to face the dishonesty and distortions from the media
Trump distorts everything, so he’s hardly able to tell what is and isn’t true.
MediaTrump distorts everything, so he’s hardly able to tell what is and isn’t true.
Trump is the one who thinks he gets to tell media if their news is distorted or not. He made himself the arbiter of truth.Media
Not Trump
Save your TDS knee jerk for a correct thread
You're embarrassing yourself.Media
Not Trump
Save your TDS knee jerk for a correct thread
It was a milestone year.Cable was in 50%-55% of all homes in 1987. Democrats tried to pass a bill to keep the doctrine going and limit freedom of speech, Reagan vetoed the bill. We don’t need a Fairness Doctrine, plenty of opinions everywhere.
Of course he does, he was elected to enforce federal lawTrump is the one who thinks he gets to tell media if their news is distorted or not. He made himself the arbiter of truth.
Did you ever figure out which department the FCC was a part of?Of course he does, he was elected to enforce federal law
To be fair it’s the American people that think he should since we elected him
Yes, did you? Obviously notDid you ever figure out which department the FCC was a part of?
I know they aren’t a part of any department, but apparently you haven’t figured that out yet.Yes, did you? Obviously not
Geez man, they are their own departmentI know they aren’t a part of any department, but apparently you haven’t figured that out yet.
Not according to the law:Geez man, they are their own department
Created by Congress to help the President enforce law, specially the federal communication act of 1934
312 to 226…landslide“When a political candidate is able to win a landslide election victory after in the face of hoaxes and distortions, there is something very wrong,” Carr said,
A Neo-GOP hoax. 49.9% of the vote is hardly a landslide.
Raygun won in a landslide in 1984 by a margin of 18 points and over 58% of the votes. Benedict Donald won by less than 2%.