Trump Threatens the Business Licenses of Broadcasters Who Continue to Be Against Him

[jc456]

They were felonies

nope, someone told you that, except they aren't. And I see you didn't take any time to research what would have made them felonies. Did you?

 

[Lesh]

he's not a criminal. the guilty verdict was civil not criminal, so let's start with facts sweetie.

Next, tell us the felony charge.

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

“Donald Trump is guilty of repeatedly and fraudulently falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information from American voters during the 2016 presidential election. Over the course of the past several weeks, a jury of 12 every day New Yorkers was presented with overwhelming evi

manhattanda.org

 

[jc456]

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

“Donald Trump is guilty of repeatedly and fraudulently falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information from American voters during the 2016 presidential election. Over the course of the past several weeks, a jury of 12 every day New Yorkers was presented with overwhelming evi

manhattanda.org

not felonies. sorry, it's been posted in here adnausea.

 

[jc456]

D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

“Donald Trump is guilty of repeatedly and fraudulently falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information from American voters during the 2016 presidential election. Over the course of the past several weeks, a jury of 12 every day New Yorkers was presented with overwhelming evi

manhattanda.org

here, take a read at your error.

schmidlap find that felony charge yet. falsifying isn't a felony, it's a misdemeanor

Falsifying business records can lead to serious legal consequences, including charges ranging from a class A misdemeanor to a class E felony, depending on the intent and circumstances surrounding the act.

https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all of the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following two elements:
1. That on or about (date) , in the county of (county) ,the defendant, (defendant's name),Select appropriate alternative: made or caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise; or altered, erased, obliterated, deleted, removed or destroyed a true entry in the business records of an enterprise; or omitted to make a true entry in the business records of an enterprise in violation of a duty to do so which the defendant knew to be imposed upon him/her bylaw or by the nature of his/her position; or2 Penal Law § 175.00(1).3 Penal Law § 175.00(2). "Computer data or a computer program" was added effective November 1, 1986.4 Penal Law § 15.05(1).2prevented the making of a true entry or caused the omission thereof in the business records of an enterprise; and,

2. That the defendant did so with intent to defraud that included an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.
Name the second crime is the ask. I read the link you provided and no second crime is mentioned. Nor is the falsifying records more than a misdemeanor and the statute of limitations ran out. Know that is all fact. Feel free to show us the second crime that would transition the misdemeanor to felony. They lied to you!!!!

 

[Lesh]

not felonies. sorry, it's been posted in here adnausea.

I just gave you a LINK to an announcement of 34 FELONY CONVICTIONS

YOU MORON

 

[jc456]

I just gave you a LINK to an announcement of 34 FELONY CONVICTIONS

YOU MORON

And I just gave you the reason why they aren't. Read it. post 224

 

[Lesh]

And I just gave you the reason why they aren't. Read it. post 224

Your “reason” is your bullshit opinion.

Those felony convictions are fact

 

[jc456]

Your “reason” is your bullshit opinion.

Those felony convictions are fact

So you didn't read the law that I posted. interesting. So you don't believe in law? Rhetorical, I get that.

 

[Lesh]

So you didn't read the law that I posted. interesting. So you don't believe in law? Rhetorical, I get that.

Apparently your interpretation differs from the prosecutor and the court

Because I gave you a link to the announcement of those 34 felony CONVICTIONS

 

[jc456]

Apparently your interpretation differs from the prosecutor and the court

Because I gave you a link to the announcement of those 34 felony CONVICTIONS

I gave you the law, the law states that in order for those 34 counts to be felonies, there had to be a second charge that made them felonies. Now, to date, there is no mention of that second charge to make those 34 counts felonies. hence, name the felony charge.

 

[Lesh]

I gave you the law, the law states that in order for those 34 counts to be felonies, there had to be a second charge that made them felonies. Now, to date, there is no mention of that second charge to make those 34 counts felonies. hence, name the felony charge.

Again… your opinion seems to differ from the people who matter

 

[jc456]

Again… your opinion seems to differ from the people who matter

well again, it's not opinion, it is the law. And as I pointed out, it's fair to say you don't believe in law.