Lonestar_logic
Republic of Texas
- May 13, 2009
- 24,539
- 2,233
- 205
No you tried to do that. I used it as a precedent for righting a wrong. Where did I say it was the same thing? You are confused again moron.
Now you resort to lying? You're the one that brought up Japanese internment camps you lying puke!
Slavery wasn't legally wrong you stupid fuck. Morally yes, legally no. You can't sue on the basis of morality and you can't prove a crime was committed so you have no case. All you have is the argument and that gets you nowhere.
No you are lying. I brought them up as a precedent. I never said they were the same thing. You tried to make that argument, failed, and proved how stupid you are. Sorry clown.
But it's not a precedent you idiot. It had nothing to do with slavery or even close.
prec·e·dent
noun
noun: precedent; plural noun: precedents
/ˈpresid(ənt/
1. an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
The two events aren't similar under any circumstance.