LOL - how in the world are you defining poor? Seems not being able to support yourself is the crux of it.I am not talking about the poor in general. I am talking about people who can't support themselves. Is that so hard to understand?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL - how in the world are you defining poor? Seems not being able to support yourself is the crux of it.I am not talking about the poor in general. I am talking about people who can't support themselves. Is that so hard to understand?
I don't remember I have ever said that.But most of us can. It's no excuse to socialize health care (or whatever else it is you want to see government take over).
Between not being able to support yourself and not wanting to support yourself at own expense there is a great distance.LOL - how in the world are you defining poor? Seems not being able to support yourself is the crux of it.
The money that I earned is my money. Is that too hard for you to understand?Some people can't be responsible for that. Is that so hard to understand?
Some people take offense to being forced to provide goods and services to be consumed by others.Some people can't be responsible for that. Is that so hard to understand?
Well, no, isn't hard. That is your view and I have a right to disagree. I don't think that a wolf pack is a good model for human society.The money that I earned is my money. Is that too hard for you to understand?
Why do you believe his money belongs to someone else?Well, no, isn't hard. That is your view and I have a right to disagree.
I don't believe in that. But there is such a thing as taxes. I think you also pay them.Why do you believe his money belongs to someone else?
But you believe he should be forced to pay for good and services to be consumed by others,I don't believe in that
Is it okay when he is forced to pay for repairing of some road he will never use?But you believe he should be forced to pay for good and services to be consumed by others,
So, yes,, you do believe that.
Well, no, isn't hard. That is your view and I have a right to disagree. I don't think that a wolf pack is a good model for human society.
Your question does not negate the fact that because you believe he should be forced to pay for good and services to be consumed by others, you -do- believe his money belongs to someone else.Is it okay when he is forced to pay for repairing of some road he will never use?
Conservatives along with the vast majority of people support helping folks who CANNOT support themselves with a safety net.I am not talking about the poor in general. I am talking about people who can't support themselves. Is that so hard to understand?
Wow, yep, there are taxes.I don't believe in that. But there is such a thing as taxes. I think you also pay them.
As you know, there is a substantial gas tax which is used for new roads and maintaining them. There is also an excise tax on all truck tires.Is it okay when he is forced to pay for repairing of some road he will never use?
Which only means I have put more thought into it than you
^^^^
This is a lie.
Even if the claim, above, was not a lie, this STILL does not prove your claim, because there's no necessary relationship between the elimination of federal social programs and the preference "to live in a nation where the poor and incompetent suffer and die in the gutter.".
Thus: Your statement is a lie.
So sadly typical of the far-left. They reach out for the prison of two ideas. They try to say if you are opposed to some excessive welfare programs, you want people to starve in the street.
As a staunch Conservative, I believe that the truly needy need a safety net. We cannot in good conscience, provide a hammock.
Thousands of businesses are closing because they cannot find help because President Joe Biden is paying them to NOT work. How is that good for anyone?
Many cons are worried about social spending, while the nation is committing suicide. They claim to believe in the constitution and cite it as the reason why social spending should be terminated, ignoring the massive spending and benefits showered on big corporations and the ultra wealthy.Is it okay when he is forced to pay for repairing of some road he will never use?
Nothing here changes the fact your statemented was a lie, as proven by the fact you made said statement knowing you could not prove it true.Many cons are worried about social spending, while the nation is committing suicide. They claim to believe in the constitution and cite it as the reason why social spending should be terminated, ignoring the massive spending and benefits showered on big corporations and the ultra wealthy.
The Bible also said 'give to the Ceaser what is Ceaser's'. No one steals your money. Paying taxes is not stealing. On the contrary, not paying them is so.A Tony Soprano criminal enterprise of stealing is a very bad model.
It is wrong to use the government to take money from one person and give it to somebody else that didn't nothing to earn it.
Being against that kind of thievery is against civilization. Even the Bile said 3,000 years ago "They Shall Not Steal". Using the government to do your stealing in no different than Tony Soprano shaking down people to get his share.
If this gallon of milk won't be buyed, it will be poured down on the ground. And the farmer won't get the money and won't spend them on some goods being produced by other workers. All in economy is intertwined., to address your question and illustrate its irrelevance to the issue:
He, like the rest of us, makes use of the infrastructure we all pay for, directly and indirectly.
The same cannot be said for the gallon of milk the state forced him to buy, to be consumed by someone else
As long as we're using taxation to manipulate society (rather than to fund government), it's corrupt. It's worse than stealing.The Bible also said 'give to the Ceaser what is Ceaser's'. No one steals your money. Paying taxes is not stealing. On the contrary, not paying them is so.