LOL Oh lordy trotting out the apartheid argument again. You can't be serious.
Let me count the ways
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwivwPLS3-3VAhWkqlQKHcnVDaAQFgguMAE&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/31/opinion/why-israel-is-nothing-like-apartheid-south-africa.html?mcubz=3&usg=AFQjCNGGOGEevS8y8w7LJYoQizVl9baczQ
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwivwPLS3-3VAhWkqlQKHcnVDaAQFggoMAA&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/jake-beaumont/israel-not-apartheid-state_b_9128056.html&usg=AFQjCNEnO36SFQAoDQ6ZEAcRfz1ZJP3Hbg
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0ahUKEwivwPLS3-3VAhWkqlQKHcnVDaAQFgg4MAM&url=https://www.adl.org/education/resources/fact-sheets/response-to-common-inaccuracy-israel-is-an-apartheid-state&usg=AFQjCNHCxOP9iyH7daWRtLeMUfaLvpJ_CQ
Not that I expect you to actually think before you speak, obviously your reactionary rhetoric is the classic revisionist diatribe and thus born of ignorance and a failure of whatever education system you were a victim of.
Facts are that apartheid is a word with a definition and that definition does NOT apply to Israel. ;-)
Sad that some ignorant few will cling to whatever lies support their preferred beliefs
And then he blithers on about international law. LOL and conveniently makes no mention of the Byzantine church that stood on the mount for centuries or the subsequent islamization of the site both before and after the crusades or the massive demolition and reconstruction that went on in the 60s.
Go
Propaganda claiming Israel is not an Apartheid state is humorous, but it is propaganda attempting to deny the obvious. Some, moronic easily brainwashed pea brains, cut and paste the propaganda, or provide links to Hasbara sites, thinking they are making a point.
Apartheid is a word with a very specific legal meaning; as defined by The International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the crime of Apartheid, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and ratified by the majority of UN member States. Zionist Israel and the USA are exceptions, supporters of Apartheid South Africa at the time of writing, to their shame. The U.S. today a supporter of Apartheid Israel, and Israel the current Apartheid state, still refuse to sign the Convention because Israel is currently contravening the Apartheid Convention.
According to article 2. of that convention, the term "Apartheid" applies to the act of; "Committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining dominance of one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them",
The Zionist Israeli "Population Registry Law of 1965" is designed to ensure Zionist Israel establishes and maintains dominance over the intrinsic Palestinian population.
The refusal of Zionist Israel to permit 5 million U.N. registered Palestinian refugees the right of return to their homeland, simply because they are non-Jewish, is another obvious example.
The many other Apartheid elements of Israeli law are too numerous to include in a short reply to your nonsense, but the Apartheid wall, separating non-Jews from the Jews in settlements and in areas surrounding the Zionist equivalent of Bantustans are other obvious examples.