What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Should Israel repair the Temple.

Boston1

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
3,421
Reaction score
501
Points
170
Location
Colorado
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
 

Eloy

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
4,949
Reaction score
382
Points
160
Location
European Union
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
By international treaty, Jordan is responsible for the care of the Noble Sanctuary. The Israelis have no legal authority to be there.
 

Sixties Fan

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
1,893
Points
390
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
By international treaty, Jordan is responsible for the care of the Noble Sanctuary. The Israelis have no legal authority to be there.

Eloy, you know better than that.

If International Law prohibits Israel to have any legal authority on the Temple Mount, their holiest site, do show us the UN and other legal sources which say so.
 

rylah

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
14,575
Reaction score
2,964
Points
290
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
By international treaty, Jordan is responsible for the care of the Noble Sanctuary. The Israelis have no legal authority to be there.

The international law does not include neither the Jewish nor Muslim laws.
Not one among those who actually control the people on the ground, interpret the international law as Europeans do. Both sides use it or neglect it to their advantage.

Israelis have every possible authority to be in ירושלים רבתי, in my opinion.
Arabs have partial authority on grounds of long presence, and on grounds of religious acceptance.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,100
Reaction score
24,288
Points
2,250
If the Jews were to do something like that, dont you think that would start a war? Like a REAL war. A big one. Not a "conflict?"
 

Eloy

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
4,949
Reaction score
382
Points
160
Location
European Union
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
By international treaty, Jordan is responsible for the care of the Noble Sanctuary. The Israelis have no legal authority to be there.

Eloy, you know better than that.

If International Law prohibits Israel to have any legal authority on the Temple Mount, their holiest site, do show us the UN and other legal sources which say so.
The site, including the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock, is in the hands of the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf which is an Islamic Trust set up in the twelfth century. Since the annexation of East Jerusalem by the Israel recently, the Israelis have allowed the waqf to retain authority over the Haram esh-Sharif.
 

Sixties Fan

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
1,893
Points
390
1300 years or so isnt historic?

1300 (it is actually 1400) years of what exactly?
If you know the number, why do question what it is? :eusa_think:
Dome of Rock

Is the Dome of the Rocks a Mosque? It is not.

The Dome of the Rock was built for the Jews, but Muslims today do not know about it.
And if it has been of great importance to Islam, why was it left to rot for hundreds and hundreds of years?

http://www.triumphpro.com/dome-of-rock-riddle.pdf

Was the Dome on the Rock originally built for the Jews?

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/bre...of-the-rocks-jewish-temple-origin/2016/10/28/

Feel free to look at all of the photos of the Dome of the Rocks for the past 200 years.

The Ottoman Empire was not poor. If the Dome of the Rocks was that important to Islam, why did Muslims let it fall apart as they did?

And why do Muslims pray with their backs to the Dome of the Rocks , towards Mecca, if they say it is very important to them?
There are other places they could kneel and pray in order to face Mecca.

 

Sixties Fan

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
20,480
Reaction score
1,893
Points
390
If the Jews were to do something like that, dont you think that would start a war? Like a REAL war. A big one. Not a "conflict?"

It has been a War, Muslims against Jews, since 1920. With 3 big wars.
The Muslims simply changed tactics in the 1970s.
 

fncceo

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
30,291
Reaction score
16,875
Points
1,915
The Temple Mount has been the source for endless headaches, the Arabs have used it as a flashpoint for both violence and incitement for far too long.

Should the Israelis simply bull doze whatever Arab structures are not historic, ban Muslims from the Mount and rebuild the temple?

I say its a simple matter of tribal rights. The Muslim structures on the mount are NOT historical in nature or of any significant age that they deserve any special considerations. They represent revisionist history in that they are recent constructs designed to obscure the history of the mount and intended to erase the true cultural history of the TEMPLE MOUNT. Also by removing the flashpoint of so much violence the Judaic people would then have an opportunity to repair the temple structure. The base and foundations appear reasonably intact and construction could begin as soon as the scrape off is complete.

GO
By international treaty, Jordan is responsible for the care of the Noble Sanctuary. The Israelis have no legal authority to be there.

Oh geesh! I'll let them know. They must have wondered in my mistake.

I personally don't think the dome of the rock should be levelled. It'll make a great gift shop for the rebuilt Temple.
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,100
Reaction score
24,288
Points
2,250
1300 years or so isnt historic?

1300 (it is actually 1400) years of what exactly?
If you know the number, why do question what it is? :eusa_think:
Dome of Rock

Is the Dome of the Rocks a Mosque? It is not.

The Dome of the Rock was built for the Jews, but Muslims today do not know about it.
And if it has been of great importance to Islam, why was it left to rot for hundreds and hundreds of years?

http://www.triumphpro.com/dome-of-rock-riddle.pdf

Was the Dome on the Rock originally built for the Jews?

http://www.jewishpress.com/news/bre...of-the-rocks-jewish-temple-origin/2016/10/28/

Feel free to look at all of the photos of the Dome of the Rocks for the past 200 years.

The Ottoman Empire was not poor. If the Dome of the Rocks was that important to Islam, why did Muslims let it fall apart as they did?

And why do Muslims pray with their backs to the Dome of the Rocks , towards Mecca, if they say it is very important to them?
There are other places they could kneel and pray in order to face Mecca.

Arabs pray with their backs to Dome of the Rock photos
who cares if it was a mosque or not? The OP said "structures"
"evidence suggests it was intended as a jewish building"
Even though it is fact that it was built by Al-Malik?
That hack of a link also stated "why would they build two buildings right beside each other?"
Umm one is a mosque and one is a shrine. They also offer NO evidence even though they state there is some.
Also, the shrine was built on bedrock. When you add in earthquakes, damage in inevitable. It has been worked on alot during the years.
 
OP
Boston1

Boston1

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
3,421
Reaction score
501
Points
170
Location
Colorado
If the Jews were to do something like that, dont you think that would start a war? Like a REAL war. A big one. Not a "conflict?"

Not at all. The site is nothing more than another way to insult Israel. They let it fall apart for decades, centuries before the leveled most of it themselves and rebuilt a new structure on the site a few years ago. They've learned their lesson about direct war with Israel. Besides it'd be over before you could blink. There's plenty of equipment in the area already and it could be scraped off in one night.
 
OP
Boston1

Boston1

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2015
Messages
3,421
Reaction score
501
Points
170
Location
Colorado
1300 years or so isnt historic?

LOL Islam didn't exist prior to about 700 years ago so ? how are any Islamic structures on the Mount older than that ?

hey my bad, I had the years mixed up. BUT, the structures on the mount mostly rotted and collapsed and were all replaced in recent years. NOT restored, but scraped and replaced in recent times. There's nothing historical about the existing structures
 

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,100
Reaction score
24,288
Points
2,250

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top