Mostly, yes.Oh, I get it, my sources are not legitimate, and yours are?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Mostly, yes.Oh, I get it, my sources are not legitimate, and yours are?
I say go fuck yourself, not mostly, all the wayMostly, yes.
One sure can, because memory is a viable do. You do it, too. OH, DON'T USE CAPS, YOU LOOK SILLY.Read it again
Hutchinson made “significant substantive changes” to her testimony, “such as conversations she originally claimed to have not been privy to or not remember.”
YOU CAN NOT MAKE CHANGES TO A CONVERSATION THAT YOU ARE NOT PRIVY (AWARE) OF OR DO NOT REMEMBER
IF YOU DO, YOU ARE A LIAR. SIMPLE AS THAT
DID YOU FALL OUT OF THE STUPID TREE AND HIT EVERY BRANCH ON THE WAY DOWN?
WAIT DO NOT ANSWER!
iku is getting a solid ikuass kicking.DOPE
Post 336
step off if you can't keep up. Let the adults converse
Ad homs only reveal that you are ignorant about this.If you believe her. I don't. But you're stupid, so you'll believe anything.
I have. It's why I'm single and content like assholes like you could never be.I say go fuck yourself, not mostly, all the way
Cassidy Hutchinson’s corrected testimony on Trump and Jan. 6 released by House GOP
House Republicans made public on Monday a document tracking Cassidy Hutchinson‘s changes to her testimony on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol as part of thegazette.com
She is changing her imagination. Hutchinson has ZERO credibilityOne sure can, because memory is a viable do. You do it, too. OH, DON'T USE CAPS, YOU LOOK SILLY.
You are imagining and you have ZERO credibility.iku is getting a solid ikuass kicking.
It sounds like you have personal issues. Thanks for sharing "rectum stretched"I have. It's why I'm single and content like assholes like you could never be.
Enjoy the dysfunctional marriage bs
All evidence says she lied, Dumbass. Nobody involved agrees with her account, and it has been directly disputed by those in the car. And her story has changed.What a shame you can't prove that.
It has never been disputed UNDER OATH.All evidence says she lied, Dumbass. Nobody involved agrees with her account, and it has been directly disputed by those in the car. And her story has changed.
You can stay gullible, Simp. I will live in the real world
She changed her own testimony, Dumbass.It has never been disputed UNDER OATH.
The best you have is Ornato saying “I don’t recall”
The liar’s go to
Is that right?She changed her own testimony, Dumbass.
Who had more incentive to make up that lunatic story about Trump trying to hijack the limo and overthrow the government: Some out of work hack who has a book to sell, or a career SS agent who would be fired on the spot for telling the story?
Hmmmmmm.......
You clowns believe anything anyone says negatively about Trump, no matter how batshit crazy it is.
It has been disputed, Dumbass. By the agents who were actually there.Is that right?
Her Trump supplied lawyer told her to lie and say she had no memory of anything
She fired him and told the truth… which has not been disputed
Disputed? Under oath?It has been disputed, Dumbass. By the agents who were actually there.
She has nothing. And you morons lap it up.
Idiots.
All evidence says she lied, Dumbass. Nobody involved agrees with her account, and it has been directly disputed by those in the car. And her story has changed.
You can stay gullible, Simp. I will live in the real world
She changed her own testimony, Dumbass.
Who had more incentive to make up that lunatic story about Trump trying to hijack the limo and overthrow the government: Some out of work hack who has a book to sell, or a career SS agent who would be fired on the spot for telling the story?
Hmmmmmm.......
You clowns believe anything anyone says negatively about Trump, no matter how batshit crazy it is.
It has been disputed, Dumbass. By the agents who were actually there.
She has nothing. And you morons lap it up.
Idiots.
The two in the car testified under oath Trump didn't do what she lied about, Dumbass.No one disputed it under oath.
Never understood WHY anyone cared about garbing the wheel THEN..... Much less nowThe best thing Hutchinson can do is say the truth. Liz Cheney coached her to perjure herself in order to get the sensational story about Trump grabbing for the steering wheel, which is ridiculous on its face because the prez is seated four feet back in the passenger cabin. If there was any back-talk all Trump would have to say is "Mister I am giving you a direct order." All these guys are military veterans and would never dare defy an order directly from the President of the United States.
It's Hutchie's best bet because either she or Liz Cheney are going to jail. Cheney brought down would be a huge step forward for the country because she is part of the Deep State cabal through her father 9/11, Iraq War mastermind Dick Cheney, as evil a man as ever walked the Earth.
Let's see if Cassidy meets up with a tree stepping in front of her car one dark night in a mysterious one-car accident.
House GOP report debunks ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinsonâs testimony on ex-prez trying to wrangle SUV to Jan. 6 panelÂ
A Republican-led House committee on Monday released a report debunking claims by ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson that the former president attempted to commandeer a Secret Service SUV on Jan. 6, 2…nypost.com
"Hutchinson, who at the time was an aide to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testified to the select committee that she was told Trump had shouted: “I’m the f—ing president! Take me up to the Capitol now!” before he tried to grab the steering wheel from the driver in a desperate effort to join his supporters marching towards the Capitol.
Loudermilk’s report notes that Hutchinson’s testimony was “directly refuted” by White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Anthony Ornato – the man who according to Hutchinson, told her the anecdote – and the Secret Service agent driving the SUV.
“Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony,” the oversight subcommittee report states.
“Hutchinson’s testimony was also contradicted by the [Secret Service] agent who was with President Trump on January 6,” the subcommittee found, which notes that “Hutchinson’s accusation came up only after the Secret Service agent’s attorney proactively brought up the subject” to select committee investigators. "
View attachment 925198
Anyone who cares about the rule of law and what is brought into proceedings under oath. The democrats KNEW this was an unsubstantiated story, they KNEW it was, at best, hearsay from a third party and thus not evidence, but decided it was worth including it in the proceedings, most likely to further the Orange Man Bad narrative they were so desperate to pass on. They KNEW their willing accomplices (you know who you are) would jump on the salacious story and line up like trained seals, honking your horns and clapping your flippers dutifully in unison at how awful the Bad Orange Man was to subdue those SS agents with his superhuman ninja moves. In short, the story was not introduced in the name of justice or finding out what really happened, but rather to further a narrative.Oh poor lil man.
Oranato told her a story
Why is oranato lying or better yet, using hyperbole
And who really gives a shit about this story