Zone1 The Constant Lie About Black Criminality

[DGS49]

Study shows drastic racial disparities in Allegheny County’s criminal justice system

A major study released by the Allegheny County executive and the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute of Politics shows a series of stark racial...

www.post-gazette.com

The linked article describes the findings of a study on the relative treatment of Blacks in the local criminal justice system (Allegheny County Pennsylvania). Reviewing the statistics mentioned, I have no doubt that they are accurate. But underlying the article is a presumption that is provably false, to wit, that Blacks' and "whites'" behavior is the same. If you tell me that a Black person is five times more likely to be charged with a crime (which this article does), then you need to show me that the relevant behavior was equal or comparable. Otherwise the statistic is meaningless.

How can one be oblivious to the data published by the FBI every year, illustrating that Black and "white" criminal behavior is NOT the same. Blacks are much more likely to be involved in the most serious crimes, and this has been true for as long as the FBI has been keeping these statistics. The reason - a subject that is much debated - is simply the 70% curse: 70% of Blacks are born into a household with no father.

Implicitly and explicitly, the authors of this study, as well as the person writing the story, are accusing local law enforcement of racism. And not just harmless racism like giving Blacks a nasty look - serious racism that can ruin a person's life. Now THAT is a slander worth suing over.

For those who can read numbers, here are some supporting numbers:

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

 

[Libby von H]

Study shows drastic racial disparities in Allegheny County’s criminal justice system

A major study released by the Allegheny County executive and the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute of Politics shows a series of stark racial...

www.post-gazette.com

The linked article describes the findings of a study on the relative treatment of Blacks in the local criminal justice system (Allegheny County Pennsylvania). Reviewing the statistics mentioned, I have no doubt that they are accurate. But underlying the article is a presumption that is provably false, to wit, that Blacks' and "whites'" behavior is the same. If you tell me that a Black person is five times more likely to be charged with a crime (which this article does), then you need to show me that the relevant behavior was equal or comparable. Otherwise the statistic is meaningless.

How can one be oblivious to the data published by the FBI every year, illustrating that Black and "white" criminal behavior is NOT the same. Blacks are much more likely to be involved in the most serious crimes, and this has been true for as long as the FBI has been keeping these statistics. The reason - a subject that is much debated - is simply the 70% curse: 70% of Blacks are born into a household with no father.

Implicitly and explicitly, the authors of this study, as well as the person writing the story, are accusing local law enforcement of racism. And not just harmless racism like giving Blacks a nasty look - serious racism that can ruin a person's life. Now THAT is a slander worth suing over.

For those who can read numbers, here are some supporting numbers:

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

I would question you using the word 'Black" in any other way then skin color.Because that is what "Black" means

During the civil war and reconstruction many so -called Blacks were so ONLY legally and not evident to any outside observer

 

[1srelluc]

Just goes to show that if you pay for a "study" they will make it turn out the way you want it.

 

[Meathead]

Study shows drastic racial disparities in Allegheny County’s criminal justice system

A major study released by the Allegheny County executive and the University of Pittsburgh’s Institute of Politics shows a series of stark racial...

www.post-gazette.com

The linked article describes the findings of a study on the relative treatment of Blacks in the local criminal justice system (Allegheny County Pennsylvania). Reviewing the statistics mentioned, I have no doubt that they are accurate. But underlying the article is a presumption that is provably false, to wit, that Blacks' and "whites'" behavior is the same. If you tell me that a Black person is five times more likely to be charged with a crime (which this article does), then you need to show me that the relevant behavior was equal or comparable. Otherwise the statistic is meaningless.

How can one be oblivious to the data published by the FBI every year, illustrating that Black and "white" criminal behavior is NOT the same. Blacks are much more likely to be involved in the most serious crimes, and this has been true for as long as the FBI has been keeping these statistics. The reason - a subject that is much debated - is simply the 70% curse: 70% of Blacks are born into a household with no father.

Implicitly and explicitly, the authors of this study, as well as the person writing the story, are accusing local law enforcement of racism. And not just harmless racism like giving Blacks a nasty look - serious racism that can ruin a person's life. Now THAT is a slander worth suing over.

For those who can read numbers, here are some supporting numbers:

Table 43

ucr.fbi.gov

What***************************ever.

 

[TheParser]

The saddest chapter in American history has been the violent behavior of an unusually large proportion of the ethnicity under discussion.

After the reforms of the 1960s, when legal and de facto segregation was ended, everyone had such high hopes for integration.

That people of that ethnicity would become productive members of society.

Instead, a large proportion of them used their new-found freedom to unleash a surge of violence starting in the 1960s and continuing to this day. (In 2022, they murdered a DOZEN passengers on the New York City subway! That is an outrage that "liberals" try to downplay.)

 

[Moonglow]

The saddest chapter in American history has been the violent behavior of an unusually large proportion of the ethnicity under discussion.

After the reforms of the 1960s, when legal and de facto segregation was ended, everyone had such high hopes for integration.

That people of that ethnicity would become productive members of society.

Instead, a large proportion of them used their new-found freedom to unleash a surge of violence starting in the 1960s and continuing to this day. (In 2022, they murdered a DOZEN passengers on the New York City subway! That is an outrage that "liberals" try to downplay.)

Thanks to conservatives abusing the black man what other course would they take when allowed to control their soul?

 

[DGS49]

In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.

What happened? Seriously.

 

[Moonglow]

In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.

What happened? Seriously.

Whites also, WTF happened to them?

 

[IM2]

In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.

What happened? Seriously.

Why don't you STHU and try working on the huge problems in white communities?

All crimes are serious and your table is from 5 years ago.

White racism is more than just giving blacks a nasty look. White racism involves things like taking 5 year old arrest tables to make claims about black criminality. And when you look at that table you will see that whites lead in 27 of the categories.

That's evidence of a white crime problem.

 

[IM2]

The saddest chapter in American history has been the violent behavior of an unusually large proportion of the ethnicity under discussion.

After the reforms of the 1960s, when legal and de facto segregation was ended, everyone had such high hopes for integration.

That people of that ethnicity would become productive members of society.

Instead, a large proportion of them used their new-found freedom to unleash a surge of violence starting in the 1960s and continuing to this day. (In 2022, they murdered a DOZEN passengers on the New York City subway! That is an outrage that "liberals" try to downplay.)

Yes we had high hopes that whites would stop. But they haven't . Meanwhile we still get white bigots talking about blacks killing 12 passengers on the subway while whites are killing all kinds of people in mass shootings.

 

[Hector12]

Yes we had high hopes that whites would stop. But they haven't . Meanwhile we still get white bigots talking about blacks killing 12 passengers on the subway while whites are killing all kinds of people in mass shootings.

Negroes have a murder rate that is nearly eight times the white rate.

 

[Vastator]

In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.

What happened? Seriously.

The Democrat party...

 

[Hector12]

Yes we had high hopes that whites would stop. But they haven't . Meanwhile we still get white bigots talking about blacks killing 12 passengers on the subway while whites are killing all kinds of people in mass shootings.

We whites had high hopes that blacks would emulate us when we gave them equal rights. They did not. Black crime rates are still high. Black rates of illegitimacy have gotten much higher. The race gap in academic achievement persists, despite expensive programs like Head Start and No Child Left Behind.

 

[Leo123]

If someone commits more crime than someone else, then the cops will be on their shit. Simple logic.

 

[Hector12]

In the 30's when Blacks were much poorer - even relatively - than they are today, their crime stats were better than comparable "whites." They were less likely to have illegitimate children. Less likely to commit serious crimes.

What happened? Seriously.

I would like to see statistics for that. My impression is that blacks have always had higher crime rates than whites, even when income is held constant. Nevertheless, before the 1960's they had lower crime rates.

What happened was the civil rights movement that extended Constitutional safeguards to blacks. When black criminals were punished much more severely than they are now, and when police brutality by whites against blacks was rarely punished, blacks had more of an incentive to obey the law.

Punishment really does work. Severe punishment works best. In the days of Jim Crow Negroes who were apprehended by the police were sometimes never heard from again.

 

[IM2]

If someone commits more crime than someone else, then the cops will be on their shit. Simple logic.

So then why aren't cops in white communities more since they make up 70 percent of the arrests annually?

 

[Hector12]

So then why aren't cops in white communities more since they make up 70 percent of the arrests annually?

Because whites have a much lower crime rate than Negroes.

 

[el midgetron]

So then why aren't cops in white communities more since they make up 70 percent of the arrests annually?

If what you are saying is true, then white people are the victims of a great disparity in policing. Why are police targeting whites? This is why we need equity.

Thats how all of these retarded victimization arguments work. “Disparities” and “equity” are a one way street. It’s all based on the demographics of the intersectionality-privilege-hierarchy. It’s all so Fn stupid.

 

[Kruska]

Whites also, WTF happened to them?

Not in the same extreme ratio tough, especially not, if you factor in the population % ratio.

 

[Ringo]

The transformation of blacks into antisocial brainless marginalized people was organized as soon as they began to fight for their civil and social rights.
Drug dealers settled in black neighborhoods, and the police could do nothing about them, because the "human rights activists" took over - they organized legal and social protection of gangsters, and at the same time began to put blacks on welfare and benefits for single mothers.
Divorce rates began to rise disastrously.

Children growing up in single-parent families did not receive firm life and moral principles, and became a breeding ground for new gangs.

Against the background of growing drug addiction and crime there was an explosion of unemployment in black neighborhoods, which brought drug addiction, drug trafficking crime and social parasitism to a fundamentally new turn.
And it went on and on.
In the end, black neighborhoods became hell, no matter what the journalists wrote. For example, blacks kill blacks 17 times more often than blacks are killed by police or whites. But it's categorically taboo in the media because it's been labeled racist.