- Jul 27, 2021
- 61,346
- 73,591
- 3,488
.By allowing priests to continue what the church knew what they were doing.
How did the church know what the priests were doing?
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.By allowing priests to continue what the church knew what they were doing.
.
How did the church know what the priests were doing?
.
The Rule of Law Is the Rule of LawyersThe State violating the sanctity of confession isn't justified regardless.
How about we remove 4th amendment rights from all teachers because some teachers fuck their students?
.You are fully aware what happened.
A priest can't divulge information regarding a person's confession. The state can't enforce this.This will be a big problem for Catholic Priests, as the sanctity of the confession is absolute in Catholic Cannon law. The Church is only questioning the violation of sacrament of confession, they agree clergy have a duty to report outside of the confessional.
Washington governor signs law threatening seal of confession; bishops push back in defense of religious freedom
.A priest can't divulge information regarding a person's confession. The state can't enforce this.
Agreed.I disagree with the law but one does need to note, the Catholic church kinda brought it upon itself.
Reminds me of how the Left had people snitch on their fellow citizens during Covid, as to whether they were wearing masks or having company over, etc.I am not Catholic but I side with that church on this issue. On first Amendment grounds and if someone cannot trust the confidentiality of confession they may not seek help at all which could cause a lot of problems in so many ways.
Also the same for people in the mental health field. Both clergy and mental health workers need that trust to administer help to those troubled. I can see more people acting out in violence if they have no one to trust.
The priest would just say they knew it was a set up, that it was an undercover cop. That's why they didn't report it.Unless investigative agencies start bugging confession booths.... And somehow I see that as a distinct possibility. All they would have to do is send in an undercover agent to make a "confession". And then prove that the priest didn't report it in a prescribed time frame. Same way that detectives buy drugs off of people or bait hookers, and then arrest them
That's called "obstruction of justice".The priest would just say they knew it was a set up, that it was an undercover cop. That's why they didn't report it.
By knowing and not reporting a set up? I don't think so. By not reporting something that didn't happenThat's called "obstruction of justice".
A small number of crimes should be reported, but I highly doubt those prone to committing them go to confession.This will be a big problem for Catholic Priests, as the sanctity of the confession is absolute in Catholic Cannon law. The Church is only questioning the violation of sacrament of confession, they agree clergy have a duty to report outside of the confessional.
Washington governor signs law threatening seal of confession; bishops push back in defense of religious freedom
This will be a big problem for Catholic Priests, as the sanctity of the confession is absolute in Catholic Cannon law. The Church is only questioning the violation of sacrament of confession, they agree clergy have a duty to report outside of the confessional.
Washington governor signs law threatening seal of confession; bishops push back in defense of religious freedom
How so?the Catholic church kinda brought it upon itself.
Are you familiar with the concept of INDIVIDUAL rights?By allowing priests to continue what the church knew what they were doing.
.A small number of crimes should be reported, but I highly doubt those prone to committing them go to confession.
It's useless.
.How can asking a question be fake news?