It makes perfect sense.I dunno man. If they had rights the wouldn't be as apt to be killed as a deer in deer season.Showing just how much this lying, corrupt, criminal, murderer does know about OUR LAWS!!!!
weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN
On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights. "The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion. Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".[1]
You could say that about a 4 years old child.... but you won't!
In LAWYERS and POLITICIANS brains, ones who GET PAID to pander, ABORTION is the only EXCEPTION to that 2004 Victim's law. Of course that makes NO LOGICAL SENSE, but here again, we are talking about MONEY and POWER, and it we were talking ETHICS, MORALS and PRINCIPLES, we wouldn't have such convoluted law!
As a consequence of your ignorance and stupidity, you’re confusing civil law with criminal law – the exemption exists in acknowledgement of the right to privacy guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, pursuant to substantive due process, in the realm of civil law.
In the realm of criminal law and procedural due process, a criminal act committed against a pregnant women resulting in the termination of her pregnancy is a crime perpetrated against the woman, not an embryo/fetus, as an embryo/fetus is not ‘entitled’ to Constitutional protections.
Only a woman has the right to decide whether to have a child or not – the state cannot compel her to give birth against her will, and a criminal actor may not take from a pregnant woman her pregnancy against her will; in either civil or criminal law, a woman’s rights and protected liberties are paramount, immune from attack by the state or an act of violence by a private individual.