Scumbag Hillary: Unborn Children Don't Have Constitutional Rights!!!

[Timmy]

Abortion restrictions have been enacted since the development of the 4D ultrasound where people can really see that it's a baby in there. It's hard to lie when people can actually see a child.

but it's not hard to pretend as if 'pro-choice' ever claimed there wasn't "a baby in there".

thank you captain obvious. ^



first trimester privacy is a set cornerstone legal precedent...

self-righteous control freaks (mostly sanctimonious white men) continue to petition their government to further intrude upon reproductive medicine, based upon no compelling cause but their emotional delusions.

creeps petition their states to force government mandated, clinically uncalled for, vaginal ultrasounds so they can force women to look at pictures, rubbing their nose in the 'evil' of their choice, as if women had no idea there was "a baby in there".

the vast majority of rational Americans understand that is a sick agenda, folks. ^

Why do you support the indiscriminate killing of defenseless babies?

They are potential babies . If u separate them from mom they can't survive , so are they really even a person?


Plus most of you abortion freaks are also pro death penalty . So u lose all moral authority .

So humans can be called potential babies but by damn if we discover a unicellulared organism on pluto, its called life. See how stupid your argument is.

Well it's alive . A plant is also alive . What's your point?

Mine is you have to draw a line somewhere . Even u anti choice people draw arbitrary lines.

If somthing can't exist on its own, how is it a person.

 

[Valerie]

planned parenthood does more to prevent unwanted pregnancy and abortion than any other organization.

why do rethuglicans advocate policy resulting in more unwanted pregnancy and abortion?





While best known as a place where women can terminate an unwanted pregnancy, Planned Parenthood offers a variety of reproductive health services for women and men, including birth control, STD/STI screenings, pap smears, breast exams and other screenings that can catch cancer, fibrosis, or other major health concerns early on.

Planned Parenthood is often the only health care poor women receive, and the free or low cost exam is a moment to see a doctor and get basic tests that might indicate the need for more comprehensive care outside of the gynecological field.

Planned Parenthood has also provided basic "well care," "first aid" and "ongoing management" of such things as high blood pressure, diabetes sugar tests, and elder checkups in towns that have been struck by a disaster...

Planned Parenthood - RationalWiki

 

[Timmy]

She was flat-broke and was kicked out of public housing for a black familyto move in. It was so bad that they had to move to Harlem. Yet, by working her ass off giving $250,000-an-hour speeches to Wall Street. she made a comeback.

Tugs at your heart strings, eh?

They were broke when they left the white house . That's a fact . Just cause the Clintons have massive earning potential doesn't mean they werent broke at that point in time .

They had three houses, and yet they were flat broke?

Sorry, she is too sleazy and you to stupid for mere words.

Your point ? They had a shit load of legal bills after all that Monica lewisky shit etc..

Lots of flat broke peeps own really nice homes .

We obviously have different definitions of "flat broke". I can't help but think yours has something to do with your brown nose and hack nature.

What is your definition . Owing more money than you have ?

 

[Staidhup]

Then why provide the word baby, as in living child, to the unborn mass of cells and tissue. Then again how can a court convict a person for murder when the mother lives and fetus dies as a result of a car accident, shooting, stabbing? The fact is the Hag and her fellow travelers view the lives of those below them as disposable and not applicable to the respect she envisions her kind demand.
As for their finances, she is and has always has been a lying hypocrite, they were never broke, they just had a large legal bill resulting from the other half's lying and perjury defense.

 

[Valerie]

and you to stupid for mere words.

 

[Chuz Life]

They are potential babies . If u separate them from mom they can't survive , so are they really even a person?

in law, terminology matters...



"the Court argued that prenatal life was not within the definition of "persons" as used and protected in the U.S. Constitution and that America's criminal and civil laws only sometimes regard fetuses as persons"

Yes and we all know how laws and past rulings are infallible and can never be questioned or challenged again.

 

[Timmy]

Then why provide the word baby, as in living child, to the unborn mass of cells and tissue. Then again how can a court convict a person for murder when the mother lives and fetus dies as a result of a car accident, shooting, stabbing? The fact is the Hag and her fellow travelers view the lives of those below them as disposable and not applicable to the respect she envisions her kind demand.
As for their finances, she is and has always has been a lying hypocrite, they were never broke, they just had a large legal bill resulting from the other half's lying and perjury defense.

Let me ask you. Do u consider a zygote to be a baby ?

 

[Meathead]

She was flat-broke and was kicked out of public housing for a black familyto move in. It was so bad that they had to move to Harlem. Yet, by working her ass off giving $250,000-an-hour speeches to Wall Street. she made a comeback.

Tugs at your heart strings, eh?

They were broke when they left the white house . That's a fact . Just cause the Clintons have massive earning potential doesn't mean they werent broke at that point in time .

They had three houses, and yet they were flat broke?

Sorry, she is too sleazy and you to stupid for mere words.

Your point ? They had a shit load of legal bills after all that Monica lewisky shit etc..

Lots of flat broke peeps own really nice homes .

We obviously have different definitions of "flat broke". I can't help but think yours has something to do with your brown nose and hack nature.

What is your definition . Owing more money than you have ?

My definition of flat broke is not a short-term cash flow problem of millionaires.

 

[Chuz Life]

"Potential" babies not not have real and tangible bodies to be disposed of (or sold for parts) after the child is killed.

An united human sperm and egg cell would be representative of a "potential" child has they (while un-united) have the potential to create one.

Once united, their jobs as human reproductive cells are over and the human organism they merged to create is now (already) in existence.

Biology 101

 

[Timmy]

"Potential" babies not not have real and tangible bodies to be disposed of (or sold for parts) after the child is killed.

An united human sperm and egg cell would be representative of a "potential" child has they (while un-united) have the potential to create one.

Once united, their jobs as human reproductive cells are over and the human organism they merged to create is now (already) in existence.

Biology 101

Yeah and ? Do you consider a zygote a human being ?

I'm all for the viability argument . But if u take a fetus from mom and it can't live on its own, how is it its own person ?

 

[MarathonMike]

One thing Hillary has made very clear. She is a big fan of Margaret Sanger that charming Eugenicist who founded an organization back in the day that later became Planned Parenthood. Here is a lesser known but very telling quote of Sanger from 1922:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

 

[Chuz Life]

Then why provide the word baby, as in living child, to the unborn mass of cells and tissue. Then again how can a court convict a person for murder when the mother lives and fetus dies as a result of a car accident, shooting, stabbing? The fact is the Hag and her fellow travelers view the lives of those below them as disposable and not applicable to the respect she envisions her kind demand.
As for their finances, she is and has always has been a lying hypocrite, they were never broke, they just had a large legal bill resulting from the other half's lying and perjury defense.

Let me ask you. Do u consider a zygote to be a baby ?

Do you consider my gun or car to be a baby?

I have called them both my "baby" at one time or another. . . and no-one protested.

But when I recognize my daughter while she was in the womb as "my baby" she is something less? That is something that you feel the need to get worked up over?

Do you deny that a human being in the fetal stage of their life is a "human" being? That they are alive? that they are the young of the parents who biologically created them?

If you do deny all of that. . . do explain SPECIFICALLY what it is that makes your biological father YOUR biological father.

I would like to read that.

 

[mamooth]

One thing Hillary has made very clear. She is a big fan of Margaret Sanger that charming Eugenicist who founded an organization back in the day that later became Planned Parenthood. Here is a lesser known but very telling quote of Sanger from 1922:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

What's the problem? Those who can comprehend basic English can read there that Sanger was pointing out that certain immoral scumbags would lie about the birth control programs and play the race card for their own political advantage, and that they should take precautions against those lies.

As your post just showed, she was absolutely correct on that count. Wise woman, Margaret Sanger.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Showing just how much this lying, corrupt, criminal, murderer does know about OUR LAWS!!!!

weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN
On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights. "The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion. Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".[1]

I dunno man. If they had rights the wouldn't be as apt to be killed as a deer in deer season.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Vigilante]

Showing just how much this lying, corrupt, criminal, murderer does know about OUR LAWS!!!!

weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN
On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights. "The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion. Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".[1]

I dunno man. If they had rights the wouldn't be as apt to be killed as a deer in deer season.

You could say that about a 4 years old child.... but you won't!

In LAWYERS and POLITICIANS brains, ones who GET PAID to pander, ABORTION is the only EXCEPTION to that 2004 Victim's law. Of course that makes NO LOGICAL SENSE, but here again, we are talking about MONEY and POWER, and it we were talking ETHICS, MORALS and PRINCIPLES, we wouldn't have such convoluted law!

 

[Vigilante]

Ah...BUT we do have THIS little matter of MURDER!

Yes, Planned Parenthood kills infants born alive...
Yes, you can be a feminist and be pro-lifeplanned-parenthood-kills-infants-born-alive-abortions/
Aug 22, 2015 ... Yes, Planned Parenthood kills infants born alive during abortions ... broken the law, as babies born alive after an attempted abortion are to be given ... think that every mother who wants n abortion would then become a mother ..

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Showing just how much this lying, corrupt, criminal, murderer does know about OUR LAWS!!!!

weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN
On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights. "The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion. Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".[1]

I dunno man. If they had rights the wouldn't be as apt to be killed as a deer in deer season.

You could say that about a 4 years old child.... but you won't!

In LAWYERS and POLITICIANS brains, ones who GET PAID to pander, ABORTION is the only EXCEPTION to that 2004 Victim's law. Of course that makes NO LOGICAL SENSE, but here again, we are talking about MONEY and POWER, and it we were talking ETHICS, MORALS and PRINCIPLES, we wouldn't have such convoluted law!

4 year old children what????

You lost me at Y

 

[Vigilante]

Showing just how much this lying, corrupt, criminal, murderer does know about OUR LAWS!!!!

weekly standard ^ | 4/3/16 | SHOSHANA WEISSMANN
On Sunday, Hillary Clinton told Chuck Todd that no unborn child has constitutional rights. "The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights," under our current laws, said Clinton. She also said that "the woman's right to make decisions" is most important when it comes to abortion. Most notable perhaps is Clinton's use of "person." Oftentimes, when talking about a woman's right to choose, pro-choicers will use terminology that suggests the unborn is not a person or human, but a "fetus."

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".[1]

I dunno man. If they had rights the wouldn't be as apt to be killed as a deer in deer season.

You could say that about a 4 years old child.... but you won't!

In LAWYERS and POLITICIANS brains, ones who GET PAID to pander, ABORTION is the only EXCEPTION to that 2004 Victim's law. Of course that makes NO LOGICAL SENSE, but here again, we are talking about MONEY and POWER, and it we were talking ETHICS, MORALS and PRINCIPLES, we wouldn't have such convoluted law!

4 year old children what????

You lost me at Y

The PRO DEATH people are looking to PUSH the time when one can MURDER your own child, I used 4 years old as an exaggeration, although 3 DAYS have been mentioned as a VIABLE time frame to KILL with no penalty!

1. MSNBC host says newborn infants don't count as...
   404 - NaturalNews.combirth_abortion_infanticide_Melissa_Harris-Perry.html
   Jul 29, 2013 ... Tags: post-birth abortion, infanticide, Melissa Harris-Perry .... even if those innocent lives include two-day-old black babies who have just .... Can kill a baby up to three years old, this isn't planned parenthood, It's Murder INC 2. ... They want to sweep up and hide their mistakes - shove it out of the public eye.
   

 

[tyroneweaver]

And Clinton is correct:

‘The Court in Roe carefully considered, and rejected, the State's argument "that the fetus is a `person' within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment." 410 U. S., at 156. After analyzing the usage of "person" in the Constitution, the Court concluded that that word "has application only postnatally." Id., at 157. Commenting on the contingent property interests of the unborn that are generally represented by guardians ad litem, the Court noted: "Perfection of the interests involved, again, has generally been contingent upon live birth. In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense." Id., at 162. Accordingly, an abortion is not "the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." Id., at 159. From this holding, there was no dissent, see id., at 173; indeed, no member of the Court has ever questioned this fundamental proposition. Thus, as a matter of federal constitutional law, a developing organism that is not yet a "person" does not have what is sometimes described as a "right to life."’

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)

Consequently, the only scumbags are those on the right hostile to privacy rights jurisprudence, who seek to increase the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty by compelling a woman to give birth against her will through force of law.

That's the equivalent of those on the left as being scumbags for giving free med care, food stamps, and other goodies for those who refuse to work
I would have thought that you would have a more liberal view of moral equivalency of the weak. But guess not.