Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Say, whatever happened to that "big hole in the ozone?"
- Thread starter Theowl32
- Start date
Gods. What a dumb fuck.
False-colour view of total ozone over the Antarctic pole on 26 October 2015. The purple and blue colorus are where there is the least ozone, and the yellows and reds are where there is more. Photograph: NASA
The UN’s weather and climate agency said on Thursday there was no cause for alarm about a record-size hole this month in the ozone layer which shields life on Earth from the Sun, as it should shrink again.
The ozone hole that appears over Antarctica fluctuates in size, normally reaching its widest in the polar spring as extreme cold temperatures in the stratosphere and the return of sunlight unleash chlorine radicals that destroy ozone.
Last year, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said it detected the first sign of ozone recovery, largely thanks to a 1987 ban on gases that cause ozone depletion, but said it could be a decade before the hole begins shrinking.
This year, a colder than usual stratosphere widened the hole to a peak of 28.2 million square km (10.9 million square miles) on 2 October, bigger than Canada and Russia put together.
False-colour view of total ozone over the Antarctic pole on 26 October 2015. The purple and blue colorus are where there is the least ozone, and the yellows and reds are where there is more. Photograph: NASA
The UN’s weather and climate agency said on Thursday there was no cause for alarm about a record-size hole this month in the ozone layer which shields life on Earth from the Sun, as it should shrink again.
The ozone hole that appears over Antarctica fluctuates in size, normally reaching its widest in the polar spring as extreme cold temperatures in the stratosphere and the return of sunlight unleash chlorine radicals that destroy ozone.
Last year, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said it detected the first sign of ozone recovery, largely thanks to a 1987 ban on gases that cause ozone depletion, but said it could be a decade before the hole begins shrinking.
This year, a colder than usual stratosphere widened the hole to a peak of 28.2 million square km (10.9 million square miles) on 2 October, bigger than Canada and Russia put together.
- Dec 8, 2013
- 22,718
- 16,942
- 2,415
- Thread starter
- #3
Gods. What a dumb fuck.
False-colour view of total ozone over the Antarctic pole on 26 October 2015. The purple and blue colorus are where there is the least ozone, and the yellows and reds are where there is more. Photograph: NASA
The UN’s weather and climate agency said on Thursday there was no cause for alarm about a record-size hole this month in the ozone layer which shields life on Earth from the Sun, as it should shrink again.
The ozone hole that appears over Antarctica fluctuates in size, normally reaching its widest in the polar spring as extreme cold temperatures in the stratosphere and the return of sunlight unleash chlorine radicals that destroy ozone.
Last year, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said it detected the first sign of ozone recovery, largely thanks to a 1987 ban on gases that cause ozone depletion, but said it could be a decade before the hole begins shrinking.
This year, a colder than usual stratosphere widened the hole to a peak of 28.2 million square km (10.9 million square miles) on 2 October, bigger than Canada and Russia put together.
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Gods. What a dumb fuck.
False-colour view of total ozone over the Antarctic pole on 26 October 2015. The purple and blue colorus are where there is the least ozone, and the yellows and reds are where there is more. Photograph: NASA
The UN’s weather and climate agency said on Thursday there was no cause for alarm about a record-size hole this month in the ozone layer which shields life on Earth from the Sun, as it should shrink again.
The ozone hole that appears over Antarctica fluctuates in size, normally reaching its widest in the polar spring as extreme cold temperatures in the stratosphere and the return of sunlight unleash chlorine radicals that destroy ozone.
Last year, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said it detected the first sign of ozone recovery, largely thanks to a 1987 ban on gases that cause ozone depletion, but said it could be a decade before the hole begins shrinking.
This year, a colder than usual stratosphere widened the hole to a peak of 28.2 million square km (10.9 million square miles) on 2 October, bigger than Canada and Russia put together.
Oh my God! You really are an ignorant libtard..
Solar output drives the southern ozone hole, which is biggest DURING the Northern Hemisphere winter. They have laid your IPCC drivel to waste some years ago. I cant believe you still believe this lie..
They proved that ionic wind (solar wind) is the main driver of creation and destruction of the ozone layer. IT IS NOT MAN CAUSED YOU IGNORANT FOOL!
You guys read to much Crayon kids site and their hyped up bull shit..
Gods. What a dumb fuck.
False-colour view of total ozone over the Antarctic pole on 26 October 2015. The purple and blue colorus are where there is the least ozone, and the yellows and reds are where there is more. Photograph: NASA
The UN’s weather and climate agency said on Thursday there was no cause for alarm about a record-size hole this month in the ozone layer which shields life on Earth from the Sun, as it should shrink again.
The ozone hole that appears over Antarctica fluctuates in size, normally reaching its widest in the polar spring as extreme cold temperatures in the stratosphere and the return of sunlight unleash chlorine radicals that destroy ozone.
Last year, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said it detected the first sign of ozone recovery, largely thanks to a 1987 ban on gases that cause ozone depletion, but said it could be a decade before the hole begins shrinking.
This year, a colder than usual stratosphere widened the hole to a peak of 28.2 million square km (10.9 million square miles) on 2 October, bigger than Canada and Russia put together.
No cause for alarm? Jesus Christ thats all we heard for years OMG!OMG!OMG! THE OOOOOOZOOOOONE LAYER!!!!!
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Well, the dumbest of our dumb fucks have made their ill informed and vacuous comments. In the meantime, the one poster that backed his opinion with facts just happens to be a moderate, if not a liberal. Just proves that saying, not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative.
Sad part is that the stupid people all denigrate education, and seem to believe that ignorance is a virtue.
Sad part is that the stupid people all denigrate education, and seem to believe that ignorance is a virtue.
Thread summary:
The scientists were proven 100% correct yet another time, the deniers were proven completely wrong yet another time, so a few of the most hard core denier cultists are throwing a tantrum over it.
Deniers, what's it like to wrong about every single thing every time? How do you handle the humiliation? I mean, besides drinking heavily, something which is obvious from your posts.
The scientists were proven 100% correct yet another time, the deniers were proven completely wrong yet another time, so a few of the most hard core denier cultists are throwing a tantrum over it.
Deniers, what's it like to wrong about every single thing every time? How do you handle the humiliation? I mean, besides drinking heavily, something which is obvious from your posts.
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
And the climate morons pipe up and add nothing..
Lets see what a few scientists have to say:
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output.. They also found it to be good for plants and killing viruses which can kill man.
It is interesting to note how the work has been misused by the left as well making wild ass assumptions from items they could not prove and the paper did not prove, but disproved.
Source
Lets see what a few scientists have to say:
We have focused mainly on recent work in order to highlight the progress made to date, and to attempt an analysis of the complexity of both independent and interacting factors on terrestrial ecosystems in terms of UV radiation and other environmental constraints, including emerging evidence of the role of stratospheric ozone trends in affecting climate.
Ozone depletion, changed exposure to ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–315 nm) radiation, and climate change exert both individual and interactive effects on biological systems, with intricate feedbacks.1,2 Some of the key factors interacting with UV radiation that affect organism response are water availability, temperature, and nutrient availability. UV radiation has also been implicated as a contributor to global warming through its stimulation of volatile organic compounds from plants, plant litter and soils. Emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) from plant litter and soils may also contribute to global warming.3,4
......
During the course of research on the effects of UV radiation, much emphasis has been placed on the potential detrimental impacts on plants and ecosystems. However, the balance of recent evidence is shifting to show that while some detrimental effects do occur, UV radiation is also a key regulator of plant morphology and physiological, biochemical and genetic processes, and is important in animal and plant signalling. Following on from this line of investigation, it has also become apparent that UV radiation and climate variables can be usefully exploited for value-adding to, e.g., agricultural crops.8 The emerging concept, that agricultural2,9 plants can become more hardy through exposure to UV radiation, represents a marked shift in perspective.8,9 In addition, certain plants produce more medicinal compounds with exposure to UV radiation.10 The overall objective is to boost the quality and/or quantity of the yield, usually selectively, e.g. by making plants less prone to attack by pests and diseases. Concepts such as that of “eustress” are also relevant. Eustress is analogous to “priming” where a stress is imposed on plants to acclimate them and develop tolerance, which facilitates better growth when exposed to a more severe stress.9,11
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output.. They also found it to be good for plants and killing viruses which can kill man.
It is interesting to note how the work has been misused by the left as well making wild ass assumptions from items they could not prove and the paper did not prove, but disproved.
Source
Iceweasel
Diamond Member
Translation = How dare you insult Zeus!Well, the dumbest of our dumb fucks have made their ill informed and vacuous comments. In the meantime, the one poster that backed his opinion with facts just happens to be a moderate, if not a liberal. Just proves that saying, not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative.
Sad part is that the stupid people all denigrate education, and seem to believe that ignorance is a virtue.
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..
No, they didn't. You just fabricated that bit of fraud. It's what you do. It's all you do.
If you didn't fake it, point out to us the exact sentence where they specifically state depletion of the ozone layer can be explained by changes in solar output. We'll wait.
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..
No, they didn't. You just fabricated that bit of fraud. It's what you do. It's all you do.
If you didn't fake it, point out to us the exact sentence where they specifically state depletion of the ozone layer can be explained by changes in solar output. We'll wait.
And once again you failed to read the paper and make wild ass accusations you can not support with any form of facts.. This is the bitter old woman we have come to expect..
Obviously lacking in that extremely gay tirade was any support for your fraudulent claim. That's because you're a fraud who faked a crazy claim and hoped he wouldn't get called on it. But I did call you on it, so now you're flailing about hysterically.
And you have two little fraud supporters now, Owl and Weasel. Ain't that cute, a group of deniers all pushing fraud together. Warms the heart, it does, seeing such fraud-based friendship.
Now, if any of you three frauds can point out the sentence in that paper which says ozone depletion is based on solar influences, please do so, as it would demonstrate that you're not as fraudulent as you appear to be. But if you just are frauds who are upset about getting busted, continue your current tactics of gay rage and evasion.
And you have two little fraud supporters now, Owl and Weasel. Ain't that cute, a group of deniers all pushing fraud together. Warms the heart, it does, seeing such fraud-based friendship.
Now, if any of you three frauds can point out the sentence in that paper which says ozone depletion is based on solar influences, please do so, as it would demonstrate that you're not as fraudulent as you appear to be. But if you just are frauds who are upset about getting busted, continue your current tactics of gay rage and evasion.
Big hole in the ozone?
Nobody has cared about that in over 25 years!!
Well.......the fringe nutters who get hysterical over anything do, but 99% of the planet is far more worried about 1,000 other things before ozone layer holes!!
Nobody has cared about that in over 25 years!!
Well.......the fringe nutters who get hysterical over anything do, but 99% of the planet is far more worried about 1,000 other things before ozone layer holes!!
Yarddog
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2014
- 17,570
- 11,848
- 1,255
Obviously lacking in that extremely gay tirade was any support for your fraudulent claim. That's because you're a fraud who faked a crazy claim and hoped he wouldn't get called on it. But I did call you on it, so now you're flailing about hysterically.
And you have two little fraud supporters now, Owl and Weasel. Ain't that cute, a group of deniers all pushing fraud together. Warms the heart, it does, seeing such fraud-based friendship.
Now, if any of you three frauds can point out the sentence in that paper which says ozone depletion is based on solar influences, please do so, as it would demonstrate that you're not as fraudulent as you appear to be. But if you just are frauds who are upset about getting busted, continue your current tactics of gay rage and evasion.
You never read the story about the three little Frauds? the first one built his house out of straw..... but then when the Sun burned a hole in the Ozone layer, his home burned to a CRISP because it was only made of straw. so he ran to the other little frauds house which he had made out of wood. When the Sun burned a hole in the OZone layer once more , their little house was once again, burned to a CRISP because it was only made of wood! but it was ok because they ran to the third little frauds house which was made of brick , so when once again the hole in the OZone layer showed up , the radiation only warmed the little frauds solar panels and they were able to get streaming sports and porn ad infinitum to their fraudulent hearts desires.
Whats this anti gay thing of yours about though?
Oh but it's gonna take 80 maybe 100 years --- before we see an effect of turning the the whole HVAC industry inside out and producing Heatin/Coolin products that now don't WORK worth a damn with the NEW shit.
So the units RUN twice as long, do HALF the work and eat MORE energy.. Probably not good for GW..
So the units RUN twice as long, do HALF the work and eat MORE energy.. Probably not good for GW..
Lets see what a few scientists have to say:
They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..We have focused mainly on recent work in order to highlight the progress made to date, and to attempt an analysis of the complexity of both independent and interacting factors on terrestrial ecosystems in terms of UV radiation and other environmental constraints, including emerging evidence of the role of stratospheric ozone trends in affecting climate.
Ozone depletion, changed exposure to ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–315 nm) radiation, and climate change exert both individual and interactive effects on biological systems, with intricate feedbacks.1,2 Some of the key factors interacting with UV radiation that affect organism response are water availability, temperature, and nutrient availability. UV radiation has also been implicated as a contributor to global warming through its stimulation of volatile organic compounds from plants, plant litter and soils. Emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) from plant litter and soils may also contribute to global warming.3,4
......
During the course of research on the effects of UV radiation, much emphasis has been placed on the potential detrimental impacts on plants and ecosystems. However, the balance of recent evidence is shifting to show that while some detrimental effects do occur, UV radiation is also a key regulator of plant morphology and physiological, biochemical and genetic processes, and is important in animal and plant signalling. Following on from this line of investigation, it has also become apparent that UV radiation and climate variables can be usefully exploited for value-adding to, e.g., agricultural crops.8 The emerging concept, that agricultural2,9 plants can become more hardy through exposure to UV radiation, represents a marked shift in perspective.8,9 In addition, certain plants produce more medicinal compounds with exposure to UV radiation.10 The overall objective is to boost the quality and/or quantity of the yield, usually selectively, e.g. by making plants less prone to attack by pests and diseases. Concepts such as that of “eustress” are also relevant. Eustress is analogous to “priming” where a stress is imposed on plants to acclimate them and develop tolerance, which facilitates better growth when exposed to a more severe stress.9,11
You lying sack of shit. They said NO SUCH THING.
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..
No, they didn't. You just fabricated that bit of fraud. It's what you do. It's all you do.
If you didn't fake it, point out to us the exact sentence where they specifically state depletion of the ozone layer can be explained by changes in solar output. We'll wait.
And once again you failed to read the paper and make wild ass accusations you can not support with any form of facts.. This is the bitter old woman we have come to expect..
And THIS is the lying, amoral, intellectually worthless sack of shit WE have come to expect. How about one of you Billy Bob worshippers help him out and find the sentence Mamooth has been asking for - the one thay states the ozone hole is produced by changes in solar output. You can fo ot. Give the man a hand.
Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,386
- 2,180
Well, the dumbest of our dumb fucks have made their ill informed and vacuous comments. In the meantime, the one poster that backed his opinion with facts just happens to be a moderate, if not a liberal. Just proves that saying, not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative.
Sad part is that the stupid people all denigrate education, and seem to believe that ignorance is a virtue.
Hey old rocks nice new car you have here.....
So dude now you are getting so upset in the environment forums that you won't even address the topic ? Just ignorant and pompous opinions ?
You must be special....
.
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
when got nothing at all..... attack the messenger..Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..
No, they didn't. You just fabricated that bit of fraud. It's what you do. It's all you do.
If you didn't fake it, point out to us the exact sentence where they specifically state depletion of the ozone layer can be explained by changes in solar output. We'll wait.
And once again you failed to read the paper and make wild ass accusations you can not support with any form of facts.. This is the bitter old woman we have come to expect..
And THIS is the lying, amoral, intellectually worthless sack of shit WE have come to expect. How about one of you Billy Bob worshippers help him out and find the sentence Mamooth has been asking for - the one thay states the ozone hole is produced by changes in solar output. You can fo ot. Give the man a hand.
Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,386
- 2,180
Not once was man made anything addressed. They noted that all changes can be shown to be driven by solar output..
No, they didn't. You just fabricated that bit of fraud. It's what you do. It's all you do.
If you didn't fake it, point out to us the exact sentence where they specifically state depletion of the ozone layer can be explained by changes in solar output. We'll wait.
And once again you failed to read the paper and make wild ass accusations you can not support with any form of facts.. This is the bitter old woman we have come to expect..
And THIS is the lying, amoral, intellectually worthless sack of shit WE have come to expect. How about one of you Billy Bob worshippers help him out and find the sentence Mamooth has been asking for - the one thay states the ozone hole is produced by changes in solar output. You can fo ot. Give the man a hand.
Ya do know who always gets so defensive about this don't you?
Cult members.
.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 85
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 248
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 111
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 516
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 1
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 125
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 43
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8164
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 475
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-