saddam and the weapons of mass destruction

[AmericanFirst]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

Libtards won't admit Bush was right because it would prove them wrong.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

 

[AmericanFirst]

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

 

[washamericom]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

Libtards won't admit Bush was right because it would prove them wrong.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

i used to say "have you seen the pictures of the dead children with their eyes still wide open ??" most people can't comprehend chemical death.. or fiery death in a cage.

but that was during the election.

 

[TooTall]

Hardly the dire emergency that Bushco hyped to the max requiring the immediate destruction of a country and there were no plans to lift sanctions, do you have any more ridiculous arguments?

"Immediate destruction"??? Use hyperbole much?
Do you keep agreements i.e. you agree to make mortgage, car payments etc right?
The reason you do is under penalty of forfeiture right?
So do you think when Saddam broke the 1991 Cease Fire agreement dozens of times so often that Bill Clinton SIGNED the 1998 Liberation of Iraq Act as Congress approved... all agreements Saddam broke we should have just continued to allow him to starve 100,000 children a year just because he wouldn't CERTIFY his WMDs were destroyed?
I mean all this evidence that WMDs existed... prior manufacturing, WMDs found, broken agreements and 100,000 children starving a year just because Saddam wouldn't Certify... to me that was proof enough he had WMDs!
HE broke agreements and forfeited his life!

It's all bullshit, they only started talking about liberation from Saddam's tyranny afterwards when they just were not finding anything and while I am on the subject of afterward, need I bring up "Brownie", Abu Gharib and the Blackwater massacre? Time after time they did shit that guaranteed we would never pacify Iraq. I still wonder if some of it was deliberate to prolong the war and maximize profits.

i like to bring Abu Ghraib and how the press and the democrats use it as a political weapon against their own country, made me sick.

Absolutely right!
The SAME IDIOTS that claim Ab Gharib that involved just 11 National Guard troops out of millions of US Military has added to the terrorists
propaganda value...ALSO don't see then where traitorous statements like these EVEN though the Harvard Study shows a direct affect:

The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , JanS. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
This idiot paints ALL one million military the same as what 11 National guards troops did!

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Terrorists around the world appreciate your out of context quotes and lies. How many attacks do you think you've inspired?

Why don't you put them in context and explain what the traitorous bastards really meant?

 

[BlindBoo]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

Libtards won't admit Bush was right because it would prove them wrong.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

The Kurds had joined Iranians and were in revolt. What was the US response at the time? It was well known that Iraq had been using gas during the war with Iran for years. Did we cut off aid? Stop the export of equipment or supplies? Nope, the CIA tried to blame Iran........

 

[AmericanFirst]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

Libtards won't admit Bush was right because it would prove them wrong.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

The Kurds had joined Iranians and were in revolt. What was the US response at the time? It was well known that Iraq had been using gas during the war with Iran for years. Did we cut off aid? Stop the export of equipment or supplies? Nope, the CIA tried to blame Iran........

Point is Iraq had WMD's, which by definition mustard gas is.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"saddam and the weapons of mass destruction"

...that GWB lied about resulting in two failed, illegal wars.

 

[BlindBoo]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

The Kurds had joined Iranians and were in revolt. What was the US response at the time? It was well known that Iraq had been using gas during the war with Iran for years. Did we cut off aid? Stop the export of equipment or supplies? Nope, the CIA tried to blame Iran........

Point is Iraq had WMD's, which by definition mustard gas is.

Had is the key word. They were either used, destroyed or lost. Both Condiliza Rice and Collin Powell proclaimed earlier in 2001 that the sanctions were working and Iraq had not been able to rebuild it's conventional army or it's WMD programs.

 

[boilermaker55]

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

Stay on topic idiot.

 

[eagle7_31]

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

Stay on topic idiot.

Speaking for myself, I was lukewarm about Iraq when Bush invaded. they did have gas weapons and may well have tried to go further had Saddam not been stopped. That being said Bush 43 mishandled the post Saddam occupation (which was my main concern in the first place). Also several weeks ago I watched a C-Span show which eluded to the first Iraq war in which the guests (former military who served in Desert Storm) said that Iraq POW's said we must move and take Baghdad or this will never end.

 

[washamericom]

"Immediate destruction"??? Use hyperbole much?
Do you keep agreements i.e. you agree to make mortgage, car payments etc right?
The reason you do is under penalty of forfeiture right?
So do you think when Saddam broke the 1991 Cease Fire agreement dozens of times so often that Bill Clinton SIGNED the 1998 Liberation of Iraq Act as Congress approved... all agreements Saddam broke we should have just continued to allow him to starve 100,000 children a year just because he wouldn't CERTIFY his WMDs were destroyed?
I mean all this evidence that WMDs existed... prior manufacturing, WMDs found, broken agreements and 100,000 children starving a year just because Saddam wouldn't Certify... to me that was proof enough he had WMDs!
HE broke agreements and forfeited his life!

It's all bullshit, they only started talking about liberation from Saddam's tyranny afterwards when they just were not finding anything and while I am on the subject of afterward, need I bring up "Brownie", Abu Gharib and the Blackwater massacre? Time after time they did shit that guaranteed we would never pacify Iraq. I still wonder if some of it was deliberate to prolong the war and maximize profits.

i like to bring Abu Ghraib and how the press and the democrats use it as a political weapon against their own country, made me sick.

Absolutely right!
The SAME IDIOTS that claim Ab Gharib that involved just 11 National Guard troops out of millions of US Military has added to the terrorists
propaganda value...ALSO don't see then where traitorous statements like these EVEN though the Harvard Study shows a direct affect:

The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , JanS. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
This idiot paints ALL one million military the same as what 11 National guards troops did!

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Terrorists around the world appreciate your out of context quotes and lies. How many attacks do you think you've inspired?

Why don't you put them in context and explain what the traitorous bastards really meant?

i'd like to hear what you think.

 

[washamericom]

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

Stay on topic idiot.

Speaking for myself, I was lukewarm about Iraq when Bush invaded. they did have gas weapons and may well have tried to go further had Saddam not been stopped. That being said Bush 43 mishandled the post Saddam occupation (which was my main concern in the first place). Also several weeks ago I watched a C-Span show which eluded to the first Iraq war in which the guests (former military who served in Desert Storm) said that Iraq POW's said we must move and take Baghdad or this will never end.

nice, well said..

i haven't heard from but would like to, from a kuwati, or the personal/boots on the ground that mission. a major conflict
Google

 

[AmericanFirst]

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

Stay on topic idiot.

Speaking for myself, I was lukewarm about Iraq when Bush invaded. they did have gas weapons and may well have tried to go further had Saddam not been stopped. That being said Bush 43 mishandled the post Saddam occupation (which was my main concern in the first place). Also several weeks ago I watched a C-Span show which eluded to the first Iraq war in which the guests (former military who served in Desert Storm) said that Iraq POW's said we must move and take Baghdad or this will never end.

Should have taken Bagdad in the first Gulf war.

 

[washamericom]

Kuwait Air Force aircraft were scrambled, but approximately 20% were lost or captured. An air battle with the Iraqi helicopterairborne forces was fought over Kuwait City, inflicting heavy losses on the Iraqi elite troops, and a few combat sorties were flown against Iraqi ground forces. The remaining 80% were then evacuated to Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, some aircraft even taking off from the highways adjacent to the bases as the runways were overrun. While these aircraft were not used in support of the subsequent Gulf War, the "Free Kuwait Air Force" assisted Saudi Arabia in patrolling the southern border with Yemen, which was considered a threat by the Saudis because of Yemen–Iraq ties.[9]

 

[boilermaker55]

Nope! It correlates quite well and you can't stand the fact. LOL

Try one more time. Look what your fearless leader called the weapons of mass destruction. You seem to make a bigger fool of yourself each and every time you post.
If you want to go by your standards, what eludes you about the meaning of Climate change?

???????????????????
How does that equate with nuclear weapons of mass destruction?

I guess Saddam was killing the Kurds with insults?

Libtards use nuclear weapons like it was the only standard, what a bunch of dupes.

Stay on topic idiot.

 

[TooTall]

Seems the made up information that was proved wrong, after the invasion, eludes you.
Keep up the stupidity.

How laughable. It still seems history eludes you.
First, you need to prove the was right.bushie that is.

Libtards won't admit Bush was right because it would prove them wrong.

I remember Saddam moving weapons to Syria, something idiot libtards won't admit. History doesn't elude me, truth eludes you.

Saddam used gas on his own countrymen the Kurds. Truth eludes you idiot.

The Kurds had joined Iranians and were in revolt. What was the US response at the time? It was well known that Iraq had been using gas during the war with Iran for years. Did we cut off aid? Stop the export of equipment or supplies? Nope, the CIA tried to blame Iran........

We didn't really like Iran very much since they had trashed our Embassy and held American hostage for over a year.

 

[TooTall]

It's all bullshit, they only started talking about liberation from Saddam's tyranny afterwards when they just were not finding anything and while I am on the subject of afterward, need I bring up "Brownie", Abu Gharib and the Blackwater massacre? Time after time they did shit that guaranteed we would never pacify Iraq. I still wonder if some of it was deliberate to prolong the war and maximize profits.

i like to bring Abu Ghraib and how the press and the democrats use it as a political weapon against their own country, made me sick.

Absolutely right!
The SAME IDIOTS that claim Ab Gharib that involved just 11 National Guard troops out of millions of US Military has added to the terrorists
propaganda value...ALSO don't see then where traitorous statements like these EVEN though the Harvard Study shows a direct affect:

The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , JanS. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
This idiot paints ALL one million military the same as what 11 National guards troops did!

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Terrorists around the world appreciate your out of context quotes and lies. How many attacks do you think you've inspired?

Why don't you put them in context and explain what the traitorous bastards really meant?

i'd like to hear what you think.

I thought I made my thoughts on the anti-Americans that made those statements rather clear.

 

[washamericom]

i like to bring Abu Ghraib and how the press and the democrats use it as a political weapon against their own country, made me sick.

Absolutely right!
The SAME IDIOTS that claim Ab Gharib that involved just 11 National Guard troops out of millions of US Military has added to the terrorists
propaganda value...ALSO don't see then where traitorous statements like these EVEN though the Harvard Study shows a direct affect:

The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , JanS. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
This idiot paints ALL one million military the same as what 11 National guards troops did!

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Terrorists around the world appreciate your out of context quotes and lies. How many attacks do you think you've inspired?

Why don't you put them in context and explain what the traitorous bastards really meant?

i'd like to hear what you think.

I thought I made my thoughts on the anti-Americans that made those statements rather clear.

you did. i want to hear what would change about these statements

 

[healthmyths]

Absolutely right!
The SAME IDIOTS that claim Ab Gharib that involved just 11 National Guard troops out of millions of US Military has added to the terrorists
propaganda value...ALSO don't see then where traitorous statements like these EVEN though the Harvard Study shows a direct affect:

The Harvard Study asked: THE EMBOLDENMENT EFFECT
"Are insurgents in Iraq emboldened by voices in the news media expressing dissent or calling for troop withdrawals from Iraq?
The resounding answer WAS YES!!! according to Radha Iyengar, a Robert Wood Johnson Scholar in health policy research at Harvard and Jonathan Monten of the Belfer Center at the university's Kennedy School of Government.
Using data on attacks and variation in access to international news across Iraqi provinces, we identify an “emboldenment” effect by comparing the rate of insurgent attacks in areas with higher and lower access to information about U.S news after public statements critical of the war.
In Iraqi provinces that were broadly comparable in social and economic terms, attacks increased between 7 percent and 10 percent following what the researchers call "high-mention weeks," like the two just before the November 2006 election.
And these statements which idiots like YOU most likely agreed with did everything in the world to encourage recruit and reward the terrorists to continue.

Senator Kerry (D) "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
NOTE: You are not that naive to think the terrorists didn't find Kerry calling OUR TROOPS terrorists absolutely EMBOLDENING???

Remember Kerry EARLIER wanted Bush to: "Without a question, we need to disarm Saddam. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ....
to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ....
"Kerry , JanS. 23. 2003

U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”
NOTE: Do you not believe the terrorists LOVED to hear our troops were cold blooded killers???

Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets"--action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
This idiot paints ALL one million military the same as what 11 National guards troops did!

then Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid(D) "The war is lost, the surge is not accomplishing anything "

Terrorists around the world appreciate your out of context quotes and lies. How many attacks do you think you've inspired?

Why don't you put them in context and explain what the traitorous bastards really meant?

i'd like to hear what you think.

I thought I made my thoughts on the anti-Americans that made those statements rather clear.

you did. i want to hear what would change about these statements

Changing the statements ?
Don't make them!
1) Murtha made the statements about 7 soldiers that only 1 was convicted! So why discuss a RARE, exceptional event that was NOT the
norm. But Murtha was doing it for Political fodder! He was a Democrat who as a former Marine should have been aware that these words would do more HARM then good and the only reason he did make the statement was for political gain!
2) Durbin made the Nazi comment about 11 soldiers that were convicted! 11 yet he blew this so out of proportion the news media biased as it was picked up and blasted Bush/America for again political gain!
3) Obama "air-raiding villages killing children" statement again NOT to be a help but political fodder! Accusing Bush of poor administration of the war and all the while HELPING the terrorists prolong and kill troops by Obama making these statements! Totally stupid at the least and again not a good
recommendation for presidential timbre if he is so stupid!
4) Kerry calling Troops terrorists! This his hatred of the military that started with his anti-vietnam testimony in 1973 when he again accused
400 soldiers of millions of doing torture cutting ears off,etc....
These were totally ignorant comments at the minimum!
Never should have been made!