Humans have rights, property can be disposed of by the owner of said property.All my arguments recognize that the fetus is human, so you are a liar, and that’s what makes you a political hack.
Slaveowners were ignorant, if they believe that blacks were Subhumans, but your analogy is associated with slaveowners perceptions of viable humans who have passed the development stage known as being born. So unless you provide me with a record that not viable fetuses were working in the cotton fields as slaves, your argument has no viability at all.
We have two sets of laws, one related to human beings, the other to property, none allows property to be made the responsibility of another without the others consent, and human beings cannot be destroyed because they are inconvenient.
I get you want it both ways, but you can’t.
You either argue it’s property, or a Human being. Can’t be both or you argue as did the slave owner did.