justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 34,292
- 27,215
- 2,905
Look up the definition of being able to dish it but not take it cuck.
Yeah no shit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look up the definition of being able to dish it but not take it cuck.
Get bent, you are such a clown. Why no such worry when leftist goons actually shut down highways, or statehouses, or cause disruptions during confirmation hearings? Marching near a clinic is terrorism now?Look up the definition of terrorism ....Dude.
Until now, I don't think I've read anything about the national abortion ban since the election. I'm sure that you can provide the board proof of any republican since Trump was elected talking about enacting a nation ban on abortion.Overturning Roe was never about ‘returning it to the states’ – that was a lie.
For the authoritarian fascist right, overturning Roe was about forcing a nationwide ban; it was about denying every American woman her right to privacy and reproductive autonomy; it was about more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.
Do you consider what's going with Tesla cars, trucks, and dealerships to be acts of terrorism? Do you consider the person who had a weapon near SC Kavanaugh's home to be an act of terrorism?Look up the definition of terrorism ....Dude.
Until now, I don't think I've read anything about the national abortion ban since the election. I'm sure that you can provide the board proof of any republican since Trump was elected talking about enacting a nation ban on abortion.
yes actually I doDo you consider what's going with Tesla cars, trucks, and dealerships to be acts of terrorism? Do you consider the person who had a weapon near SC Kavanaugh's home to be an act of terrorism?
They were not just "marching" foolGet bent, you are such a clown. Why no such worry when leftist goons actually shut down highways, or statehouses, or cause disruptions during confirmation hearings? Marching near a clinic is terrorism now?
Let’s try to get our heads around this. Trump’s justification and rational for supporting the overturning of Roe v Wade was that the issue should be returned to the states where the people of those states will address the issue based on the will of the people . Right?
So, now we have states where abortion is legal, but where anti abortion terrorists are running amok and doing all that they can to intimidate and shut down abortion provider and cower the patients .
And what is the Trump administrations response? Lets have a look :
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/02/anti-abortion-trump-doj-protests-00206784
First he pardons those guilty of violent acts that they committed and they his DOJ drops ongoing investigations concerning threats against clinics . This is not “letting the states decide” The people of those states decided, through their representative that abortion will be legal. But the Trump administration is undermining the will of the people by allowing these fanatics to flout the law ,
While they may face state charges , the penalties are much lighter:
So much for the will of the people . These terrorist do not represent the majority of the people who want abortion to be legal
Overturning Roe was never about ‘returning it to the states’ – that was a lie.
For the authoritarian fascist right, overturning Roe was about forcing a nationwide ban; it was about denying every American woman her right to privacy and reproductive autonomy; it was about more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.
Looked at them mean, showed them a sign?They were not just "marching" fool
I'm guessing that Ogle's referring to the Plan B pills and the like. Guess what though patriot, that's STILL not anywhere close to a national abortion ban because of the fact that other methods of abortion would still be legal. Also, just because this bill got reintroduced, doesn't mean that it's going to go anywhere. If it did, why didn't this bill get through committee the other time(s) it was initially introduced in 2023?![]()
Rep. Ogles Reintroduces Bill to Federally Ban Chemical Abortions
WASHINGTON, DC - Congressman Andy Ogles (TN-05) reintroduced the Ending Chemical Abortions Act of 2025, a bill that would federally block the use of chemical abortions in the United States. Rep. Ogles originally introduced this legislation in September 2023 for the 118th Congress.ogles.house.gov
Loading…
www.congress.gov
Loading…
www.fastcompany.com
Pull your head out Mister!!
Sux to be pro baby killing, huh?Let’s try to get our heads around this. Trump’s justification and rational for supporting the overturning of Roe v Wade was that the issue should be returned to the states where the people of those states will address the issue based on the will of the people . Right?
So, now we have states where abortion is legal, but where anti abortion terrorists are running amok and doing all that they can to intimidate and shut down abortion provider and cower the patients .
And what is the Trump administrations response? Lets have a look :
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/02/anti-abortion-trump-doj-protests-00206784
First he pardons those guilty of violent acts that they committed and they his DOJ drops ongoing investigations concerning threats against clinics . This is not “letting the states decide” The people of those states decided, through their representative that abortion will be legal. But the Trump administration is undermining the will of the people by allowing these fanatics to flout the law ,
While they may face state charges , the penalties are much lighter:
So much for the will of the people . These terrorist do not represent the majority of the people who want abortion to be legal
You first.![]()
Rep. Ogles Reintroduces Bill to Federally Ban Chemical Abortions
WASHINGTON, DC - Congressman Andy Ogles (TN-05) reintroduced the Ending Chemical Abortions Act of 2025, a bill that would federally block the use of chemical abortions in the United States. Rep. Ogles originally introduced this legislation in September 2023 for the 118th Congress.ogles.house.gov
Loading…
www.congress.gov
Loading…
www.fastcompany.com
Pull your head out Mister!!
That’s quite a bizarre boatload of brazen bovine excrement ! You said “I don't think I've read anything about the national abortion ban” Obvviously you are not listening . Furthermore, you just dug your own grave and proved yourself a foolI'm guessing that Ogle's referring to the Plan B pills and the like. Guess what though patriot, that's STILL not anywhere close to a national abortion ban because of the fact that other methods of abortion would still be legal. Also, just because this bill got reintroduced, doesn't mean that it's going to go anywhere. If it did, why didn't this bill get through committee the other time(s) it was initially introduced in 2023?
As for Burlison's plan, when nothing comes out from this, what then? Because I firmly believe that the SC already took the federal government out of abortion "business". So, I'm not concerned at all. Want to know how I know this isn't being taken seriously? The total lack of outrage over Burlison's proposal.
Why is that the only thing anti-abortion have in their sleeve is emotinalism and redefining reality?Sux to be pro baby killing, huh?
Why is that the only thing anti-abortion have in their sleeve is emotinalism and redefining reality?
No babies are killed in an abortion.
Protoplasm. It is nothing near murder as that only applies to human beings.What is killed?
Protoplasm. It is nothing near murder as that only applies to human beings.
Abortion is great as it offers a woman the full opportinity to exercise her right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Abortion is a medical achievement to be celebrated as it means women are no longer slaves to nature and victims of unwanted motherhood.
How is that even relevant? Saliva has DNA, is spitting murder? Fingerprints have DNA, is typing on the keyboard murder?What's protoplasm? Does it have DNA?