CarsomyrPlusSix-
#4,559 “The start of an organism's lifespan means that the organism is present”
NFBW2208100848-
#4,561 That is not a scientific fact at all. The physical presence is there but there is no scientific evidence of human consciousness.
CarsomyrPlusSix-
#4,569 “Which is not relevant when noting that the young Homo sapiens, the human being, is alive”
NFBW2208101646-
#4,573 Human cultures and societies are very complex and made of a very broad and mixed diversity of individual human beings who have consciousness, free will and ability to do amazing human things that other animals in the animal kingdom cannot do.
ding-
#4,574 “Who am I to believe that a new genetically distinct human being comes into existence after fertilization? A rational person.
NFBW: Why did you
ding CarsomyrPlusSix ignore the context I presented on the question of when human life begins based upon the cultural and societal reality of what being human is?
Does the physical presence of living human matter, with a new unique individual DNA in a one-cell living organism, make it a sacred living “human being” in the cultural and societal sense mentioned above cause us to have no choice but to grant it the same right to life and protection as thise human beings that are born?
Or does the scientific biological fact that a one-cell being of the human species has no consciousness, free will or the ability to do anything mean it’s right to life is derived solely at the discretion of the woman who is sustaining its life? END2208102150