Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NFBW: I’ve told you a zillion times life begins at conception when a human egg is fertilized which is not a human being. IT is a one cell human organism in that instant that is part of a now pregnant woman’s body. IT IS NIT A HUMAN BEING when it is one cell. No scientist says it is. You are a liar.we can't have THAT discussion until you acknowledge when human life begins.
NotNFBW: I’ve told you a zillion times life begins at conception when a human egg is fertilized which is not a human being. IT is a one cell human organism in that instant that is part of a now pregnant woman’s body. IT IS NIT A HUMAN BEING when it is one cell. No scientist says it is. You are a liar.
Tell us A ZILLION AND ONENot
NOT
Nit
I'm not the one who has a problem with the scientific definition of life.#GETHELP
NFBW: I’ve told you a zillion times life begins at conception when a human egg is fertilized which is not a human being. IT is a one cell human organism in that instant that is part of a now pregnant woman’s body. IT IS NIT A HUMAN BEING when it is one cell. No scientist says it is. You are a liar.
Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. the first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
Not gonna mince words... You're kind of garbage, pal. This is either trolling, stupidity, or stupid trolling, or trolling stupidity.NFBW: Are you happy that Trump’s SCOTUS Sanctions murder when a majority in any given state sanctions murder by making murder of a one cell fertilized human egg legal in the laws of the state.
Appeal to bureaucracy isn't an established logical fallacy, but you are certainly doing your best to mainstream it as one.NFBW: Every human I’ve ever known including myself and in all legal documents such as when we humans start collecting social security, is based on age calculated from the first day that we all took our first breath and began oxygenating our own blood.
Every human being has unalienable rights from the moment they are created. We are created at the beginning of our lifespan. When was that again? Oh yeah.Prior to that moment every fetus has no rights whatsoever
He denies they are human beings so that he doesn't have to consider their moral and legal rights. To him there is nothing immoral about ending their lives and denying any consideration of their rights. That's why he keeps making ridiculous arguments. He knows that if he concedes this point he has lost the argument because he has no moral or legal basis for denying their right to life.Every human being has unalienable rights from the moment they are created. We are created at the beginning of our lifespan.
A fetus in the womb is not a human being yet. It is a start. that is what science tells us. One human cell with no brain and no heart and no skin abd no longs is human but not a human being yet, and it is a part of another human being for uo to nine months.Every human being has unalienable rights
A fetus in the womb is not a human being yet. It is a start. that is what science tells us. One human cell with no brain and no heart and no skin abd no longs is human but not a human being yet, and it is a part of another human being for uo to nine months.
Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. the first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
I deny a one cell living human organism is a human being because that is a conclusion that is absurd on a scientific basis. when made on a religious basis it can make sense and you are free to follow your conscience in America. Based on science my conscience is clear as mother Bart’s pure white skin.He denies they are human beings so that he doesn't have to consider their moral and legal rights.
So you don't have to consider the morality of ending their lives, right? Or even consider their rights, right? Because you believe it's not immoral to kill them or disregard their rights because they aren't human beings, right?A fetus in the womb is not a human being yet. It is a start. that is what science tells us. One human cell with no brain and no heart and no skin abd no longs is human but not a human being yet, and it is a part of another human being for uo to nine months.
Because you believe it's not immoral to kill them or disregard their rights because they aren't human beings, right?I deny a one cell living human organism is a human being because that is a conclusion that is absurd on a scientific basis. when made on a religious basis it can make sense and you are free to follow your conscience in America. Based on science my conscience is clear as mother Bart’s pure white skin.
Yes they begin as one human cell with no brain. What’s your point
Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. the first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization
WRONG. I’m not killing anybody and it’s none of my secular humanist business what goes on inside a woman’s body when she causes no harm to a viable human being inside or out. A one celled being is not a viable human being and it’s part of the body that is growing it and no one else. That is the end of that. If it’s an unwanted growth it’s up to her to deal with prior to viability and then I say after viability is possible it is killing a human being unless in self- defense just like you and me.Because you believe it's not immoral to kill them or disregard their rights because they aren't human beings, right?
The point is they are human beings.Yes they begin as one human cell with no brain. What’s your point
Landrum B. Shettles, M.D., P.h.D. the first scientist to succeed at in vitro fertilization“The zygote is human life….there is one fact that no one can deny; Human beings begin at conception.”
Like I said.... you don't see it as immoral to end their life because you don't believe they are human beings. And you don't believe it is immoral to deny consideration of their rights because you don't believe they are human beings.WRONG. I’m not killing anybody and it’s none of my secular humanist business what goes on inside a woman’s body when she causes no harm to a viable human being inside or out. A one celled being is not a viable human being and it’s part of the body that is growing it and no one else. That is the end of that. If it’s an unwanted growth it’s up to her to deal with prior to viability and then I say it is killing a human being unless in self- defense just like you and me.
You already admitted otherwise.A fetus in the womb is not a human being yet.
NFBW: Great. I am not disputing that. END2208042510
NFBW: Yes, we never change species from fertilization unto death. END2208041513
Life OUTSIDE THE WOMBI'm not the one who has a problem with the scientific definition of life.
POTENTIALLike I said.... you don't see it as immoral to end their life because you don't believe they are human beings. And you don't believe it is immoral to deny consideration of their rights because you don't believe they are human beings.
Right?
