Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[BackAgain]

You can always pretend, with no evidence, that "the media" is to blame when most folks hold a different opinion than you, as well as pretend that you do not obtain your information via "the media."

Most Americans support legal abortion, upholding Roe v Wade​

Irrelevant.

 

[BackAgain]

You're a fucking mess kid. I can't take you seriously

Nobody gives a shit who an asshole like you imagines he can or can’t take seriously. You’re retarded beyond hope of recovery. Gfy.

 

[beagle9]

So you think a state govt. has some right to legalize the murder of babies.

No one's saying that, but it could happen that way in which would be furthering the tragedy of open abortion unregulated consequences of state's choosing such a thing like that. We have to start somewhere, and this would be much better than us having to deal with a federal government forcing the abortion processes into every state by mandate, and this while it is being controlled by those who would back it or direct it to do such a thing.

 

[Bezukhov]

I'm surprised that no Republican has suggested allowing fetuses to carry firearms. Fetuses exercising their 2nd Amendment rights would stop abortions toot sweet.

 

[beagle9]

I'm surprised that no Republican has suggested allowing fetuses to carry firearms. Fetuses exercising their 2nd Amendment rights would stop abortions toot sweet.

I'm surprised that your brain has enough matter to think at all. lol

 

[DudleySmith]

No one's saying that, but it could happen that way in which would be furthering the tragedy of open abortion unregulated consequences of state's choosing such a thing like that. We have to start somewhere, and this would be much better than us having to deal with a federal government forcing the abortion processes into every state by mandate, and this while it is being controlled by those who would back it or direct it to do such a thing.

Some keep babbling about 'states' rights' here; it's still murder just because the Fed is out of the game. It's a distinction without a difference.

 

[DudleySmith]

Irrelevant.

Yes. The number of tards who think that just because a majority of halfwits approve of something it should be legal is scary.

 

[beagle9]

Some keep babbling about 'states' rights' here; it's still murder just because the Fed is out of the game. It's a distinction without a difference.

I agree, but we must get the Fed's out of it before it can be stopped, because the Fed's are a disaster anymore, and they have become a loose cannon depending on who is controlling it. Breaking it down hopefully is the begining of the end for out of control abortion's being promoted or stood up for at a federal level.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

BackAgain joins the fray
NFBW2207191519

BackAgain #2,434 Yes. It does mention born. But it doesn’t say that the preborn are, on such a flimsy basis, denied the right to life.

NFBW: Which means it does not say that a clump of “live” cells going through the process of human development and fully dependent on an actual citizen for its growth to continue such growth has a right to have the government force that citizen to allow that growth to continue against her will.

So what makes you so special that you get to add language to the Constitution but no one else can? Are you a Christian or something? END2207191519

 

[ding]

I would think that a Libertarian publication would support.....Liberty as in minimal government interference in personal choices

That's not the job of SCOTUS. That's the job of legislatures. So now they need to do their jobs.

 

[miketx]

BackAgain joins the fray
NFBW2207191519

BackAgain #2,434 Yes. It does mention born. But it doesn’t say that the preborn are, on such a flimsy basis, denied the right to life.

NFBW: Which means it does not say that a clump of “live” cells going through the process of human development and fully dependent on an actual citizen for its growth to continue such growth has a right to have the government force that citizen to allow that growth to continue against her will.

So what makes you so special that you get to add language to the Constitution but no one else can? Are you a Christian or something? END2207191519

Yes baffle them with bullsht!

 

[ding]

Some keep babbling about 'states' rights' here; it's still murder just because the Fed is out of the game. It's a distinction without a difference.

Is it a distinction without a difference? I can see how one might view it that way but each branch of government has a different job to do. SCOTUS did their job by kicking it back to the states to decide how to handle abortion. It remains to be seen if the federal legislature will enact federal legislation. But SCOTUS was correct in telling the state and federal legislatures to do your job. It's not the court's job to write laws. So for me it is not a distinction without a difference. It's a wake up call.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

BackAgain joins the fray
NFBW2207191519

BackAgain #2,434 Yes. It does mention born. But it doesn’t say that the preborn are, on such a flimsy basis, denied the right to life.

NFBW: Which means it does not say that a clump of “live” cells going through the process of human development and fully dependent on an actual citizen for its growth to continue such growth has a right to have the government force that citizen to allow that growth to continue against her will.

So what makes you so special that you get to add language to the Constitution but no one else can? Are you a Christian or something? END2207191519

You got your states right move on

 

[BackAgain]

BackAgain joins the fray
NFBW2207191519

BackAgain #2,434 Yes. It does mention born. But it doesn’t say that the preborn are, on such a flimsy basis, denied the right to life.

NFBW: Which means it does not say that a clump of “live” cells going through the process of human development and fully dependent on an actual citizen for its growth to continue such growth has a right to have the government force that citizen to allow that growth to continue against her will.

So what makes you so special that you get to add language to the Constitution but no one else can? Are you a Christian or something? END2207191519

Wrong. What it guarantees is the right to life.

I didn’t add language at all. That’s you tools doing that shit.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Many men are doing LIFE in prison for murdering unborn babies.
How do vile Leftists explain that? They cannot begin to and dare not even try.
Scott Peterson murdered Stacey and Conner, his unborn son.
It was Scott's "choice," wasn't it Leftists, sick, evil Leftists.

 

[alang1216]

Many men are doing LIFE in prison for murdering unborn babies.
How do vile Leftists explain that? They cannot begin to and dare not even try.
Scott Peterson murdered Stacey and Conner, his unborn son.

It wasn't Stacey that made that choice.

It was Scott's "choice," wasn't it Leftists, sick, evil Leftists.

No it wasn't.

View attachment 672007

Transplanting organs from pigs to humans​

Should we now consider pigs to human? Maybe you should refine your definition of what it means to be human.

 

[ding]

Should we now consider pigs to human? Maybe you should refine your definition of what it means to be human.

That didn't enter into the calculus of overturning Roe v Wade.

But feel free to engage your state and federal representatives and convince them because they will be the ones writing the laws.

 

[ding]

I for one would love to see the federal government write abortion and climate change laws. If these are as important issues as they keep saying they are then it would seem to be time to put their money where their mouth is. I just can't help but think that they don't really believe these are important issues though. It seems to me they would rather not address these issues through legislation and keep these issues as dog whistles for their base.

 

[Delldude]

That didn't enter into the calculus of overturning Roe v Wade.

But feel free to engage your state and federal representatives and convince them because they will be the ones writing the laws.

That isn't occurring to the cradle to grave mindset.

 

[ding]

That isn't occurring to the cradle to grave mindset.

They seem to want to rehash Dobbs v Jackson more than anything else. Seems like a waste of time as that ruling did not rule on the legality of abortion only that abortion isn't a constitutional right.