No, "right to choose" to you means, strictly, to have an abortion. There is no right to choose in your idyllic liberal world. The definition of a woman is totally reliant on which option she chooses.
It may not have been over turned by the court, but is was overturned by constitutional amendment, and both times it concerned individual liberties. Feel free to pursue an amendment to reinstate Roe.
—No universal healthcare
—No universal childcare
—No paid family & medical leave
—One of the highest rates of maternal mortality among rich nations
You know, it's really telling that you are trying to use Dred Scott as your benchmark. Dred Scott is universally panned as the WORST Supreme Court decision of all time. I can't even figure out what you're point is supposed to be? Are you saying that today's decision is just as bad as Dred Scott?
You forget one thing. If it energizes Democrats to go vote, it will most certainly energize Republicans. I dare say it might even energize Republicans more given they will perceive victory on this issue. So, this is a wash politically for Democrats. Couple the new Republican enthusiasm over the ruling with their disdain over the economy and gas prices, and you have a recipe for disaster for Democrats.
Blacks are approximately 13 per cent of the population but have 35-ish (year by year differs slightly) per cent of abortions. Most Planned Parenthood clinics are in walking distance of black and brown neighborhoods. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was a vocal racist who called for eugenics against black babies.
More black babies have been surgically aborted since 1973 to today than was the entire black American population in the United States in 1960.
And, none of this is needed if you'd just use your felon brain: if you quit killing babies, the population will rise. How can you not understand that?
You are way late. Stats provide by my neighbor and fellow board member TNHarley nearly 3 hours ago. You may have missed it, due to being caught up in the frey of current event.
It is still not a racial issue alone and never was.
Jeez. I actually have no felon brain. I still have copies of every SF86 ever submitted, every time there as a clearance upgrade (several) somebody wanted me to have, so I could do my job. I'm clean as a hounds tooth. My last check, not for clearance was by the Department of Homeland Security, along with all local and state agencies within the last few years for my Concealed Carry Permit, which a pass, like all other checks, no matter the year or agency.
When I worked at the county jail a huge chunk of the men being held were there for non-payment of child support. Doesn’t seem weak to me.
And I don’t know what you’re talking about it generally only applying to divorces. Most CS payer’s baby-mommas are either ex-girlfriends or one-night-stand accidents.
Unwanted pregnancies have *massive* financial consequences for fathers as well as mothers.
Which is why men should take birth control in their own hands and just wear a condom.
—No universal healthcare
—No universal childcare
—No paid family & medical leave
—One of the highest rates of maternal mortality among rich nations
You know, it's really telling that you are trying to use Dred Scott as your benchmark. Dred Scott is universally panned as the WORST Supreme Court decision of all time. I can't even figure out what you're point is supposed to be? Are you saying that today's decision is just as bad as Dred Scott?
Oklahoma cannot restrict travel. It violates Constitutional freedoms. Any attempt by any state to restrict travel would go VERY badly for the government proposing it.
You seem to be under the mistaken belief that the majority of the American people favour this decision. 80% of Americans think abortion is a right to some point. Even the most extreme anti-abortionists think that the woman shouldn't have carry a pregnancy that results from rape or incest, to term.
ACB is a member of a small radical Catholic sect and was completely unqualified to be a SC justice. Her church is currently under investigation for sexual abuse of women and it only has 1500 members. I don't think cult members make good court members.
I'm sure, you being a foreign commie and all, are unaware that religious tests for office are unconstitutional in the US. She's much more qualified than Kagan, who never served as a judge.
They addressed that in the decision when they indicated that abortion is not a gender issue ...
and doesn't fall under gender protections either, such as those listed in Article 14.
When I worked at the county jail a huge chunk of the men being held were there for non-payment of child support. Doesn’t seem weak to me.
And I don’t know what you’re talking about it generally only applying to divorces. Most CS payer’s baby-mommas are either ex-girlfriends or one-night-stand accidents.
Unwanted pregnancies have *massive* financial consequences for fathers as well as mothers.
Which is why men should take birth control in their own hands and just wear a condom.
I know many women who got pregnant when not married. I know of NO fathers forced to pay child support for the result. I know of several who just walked away...with no repercussions. No one came after them. There were no paternity tests