Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,382
- 28,252
- 2,180
Who has done that? Ever?.... putting prisoner leg monitors on women that are pregnant to keep track of them make sure they're not going out of state to have an abortion. .....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who has done that? Ever?.... putting prisoner leg monitors on women that are pregnant to keep track of them make sure they're not going out of state to have an abortion. .....
It was on the news some anti-abortion female legislator, down in Oklahoma suggested that to keep track of women who are pregnant so they can stop them at the border and arrest them.Who has done that? Ever?
No it's not it's a fetus, a gestational stage human beings go through. It's not a child until it's born. Children / people have birth dates. Fetuses do not. And no such animal as an " unborn child " has ever existed. Women who are pregnant and want to continue the pregnancy through fruition affectionately call the fetus a child. But it's not the correct legal term. That's one of the reasons department of health and human services is so upset with donald trump when he banned the use of a whole bunch of words including fetus. It made their work almost impossible, less legal and more irresponsible.Because that is TRUE.
No, the piece of shit that is SCOTUS has traditionally gotten off by playing word games. An example is "viability," which is an oxymoron.No it's not it's a fetus, a gestational stage human beings go through. It's not a child until it's born. Children / people have birth dates. Fetuses do not. And no such animal as an " unborn child " has ever existed. Women who are pregnant and want to continue the pregnancy through fruition affectionately call the fetus a child. But it's not the correct legal term. That's one of the reasons department of health and human services is so upset with donald trump when he banned the use of a whole bunch of words including fetus. It made their work almost impossible, less legal and more irresponsible.
Viability and non-viability are terms best to determined by a doctor, a person with medical expertise.No, the piece of shit that is SCOTUS has traditionally gotten off by playing word games. An example is "viability," which is an oxymoron.
End of story.Viability and non-viability are terms best to determined by a doctor, a person with medical expertise.
There is never a time it is not human life. Try to keep up with this crotch-clownism, because smuggling another term into the argument is like POSCOTUS using the oxymoronic term, "viability."The egg and the sperm are human and alive.. When combine they become a single cell with a unique combination of human DNA from its parents. It is not, at the time of conception, a human being.
would that be like mandating vaccinations with an experimental drug? or mandating mask wearing?With any freedom's or granted rights outside of the constitution given, then of course you do know that if those freedom's or rights begin to morph into something that begins to deteriorate the nation's cultural harmonies, societal norms, communities, moral's and agreed upon standard's, then a revisiting of those specific rights granted is always a potential if the people can't handle what they've been granted outside of the constitution in a trial so to speak or they intentionally abuse the rights granted, otherwise by using them to abuse other's in which was not suppose to happen...
So if the people begin to abuse those rights granted, and especially in order to abuse and destroy their fellow citizens with them, then a revisiting of those rights will be looked at in order to limit the abuse and destructiveness after what was granted begins to be used in order to abuse other's with.
It's up to the people to do all things decent and in order, and in moderation... It best to regulate themselves before other's are forced to regulate their actions for them. Don't you agree ??
what is the presidential election then?There is no such thing as a national vote in the USA.
But the Connecticut gesture of 1820 was precisely a wave of statutory restriction because of "experimental" abortifacients from plants that women were using, thus expanding criminal liability.would that be like mandating vaccinations with an experimental drug? or mandating mask wearing?
interesting, but how about answering the questionBut the Connecticut gesture of 1820 was precisely a wave of statutory restriction because of "experimental" abortifacients from plants that women were using, thus expanding criminal liability.
50 state elections, plus DC.what is the presidential election then?
The question has already been answered by pointing to the attempts to mandate abortion due to chemical experiments of the populace.interesting, but how about answering the question
English?yeah I was thinking the same thing.someone who is not a troll must have somehow highjacked his account because he usually posts the same garbage stann does as you well know.
The presidential election is 51 separate elections in the states and DC.what is the presidential election then?
50 separate state elections. There is no political mechanism in the Constitution for a National vote of any kindwhat is the presidential election then?
Never said it wasn't human or alive. Why do so many anti-Choice folks refuse to answer the question of when should the single cell, a fertilized egg, be entitled to the rights of of a baby born alive?There is never a time it is not human life. Try to keep up with this crotch-clownism, because smuggling another term into the argument is like POSCOTUS using the oxymoronic term, "viability."
The founders were sneaky. There is no national referendum.That would be we the people and our one nation.