TakeAStepBack
Gold Member
- Mar 29, 2011
- 13,935
- 1,742
- 245
Yes, everyone please do go back and look at what was said. Fakey is having comprehension problems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, everyone please do go back and look at what was said. Fakey is having comprehension problems.
You are a negative irrelevance in American reactionary politics, as is Ernie S. and the other dullards.
You are in the minuscule number.
You have fail, son.
you're a reactionary
What a lot of slobbering by the reactionaries. The below is from a basic HS powerpoint presentation.
Some of the slobbering bloviators obviously did not get through or just slept in high schoo.
Far Right of the Spectrum Reactionary (Far Right) Advocate a return to a previous state of affairs,
often a social, political or economic order that existed earlier in history. Will use extreme measures to
achieve their goals including violence. (Fascist Dictatorships, Monarchies, Oligarchies, such as Taliban)
http://www.rocklin.k12.ca.us/staff/rspears/govt/Political Spectrum.pdf
What a lot of slobbering by the reactionaries. The below is from a basic HS powerpoint presentation.
Some of the slobbering bloviators obviously did not get through or just slept in high schoo.
Far Right of the Spectrum Reactionary (Far Right) Advocate a return to a previous state of affairs,
often a social, political or economic order that existed earlier in history. Will use extreme measures to
achieve their goals including violence. (Fascist Dictatorships, Monarchies, Oligarchies, such as Taliban)
http://www.rocklin.k12.ca.us/staff/rspears/govt/Political Spectrum.pdf
Yes, everyone please do go back and look at what was said. Fakey is having comprehension problems.
So the obvious question is, "Obama won a second term. Why not work with him like the clear majority of Americans want?"
A "clear" majority of americans didnt even vote. not for Obama or for Romney. They voted no one. So the question is based on a false premise.
I certainly didn't vote for either: they want me to play the game Democracy, they have to offer normal and respectable people to vote for, that's how that works.
If they want to put up weirdo Mormons or socialist Muslim blacks from Chicago, hey, they don't need me in this game.
You say that because you know what you're talking about. Jake uses terms he doesn't understand.
I finally had to put Jakie on ignore since he has went completely off his rocker..
there was no point in the rantings of the insane
He never had a rocker to begin with. He's just mad because he can not piece together a cogent argument. It's like those drunk guys I see talking to themselves on the corner near m building.
What a lot of slobbering by the reactionaries. The below is from a basic HS powerpoint presentation.
Some of the slobbering bloviators obviously did not get through or just slept in high schoo.
Far Right of the Spectrum Reactionary (Far Right) Advocate a return to a previous state of affairs,
often a social, political or economic order that existed earlier in history. Will use extreme measures to
achieve their goals including violence. (Fascist Dictatorships, Monarchies, Oligarchies, such as Taliban)
http://www.rocklin.k12.ca.us/staff/rspears/govt/Political Spectrum.pdf
You're the one who supports the neocon, socon, reactionary Republican party. You can't rent it, you own it, you're a reactionary. Can I drop by some time and use your outhouse?
Republican obstructionism isn't about Obama and hasn't been for a while now.
So the obvious question is, "Obama won a second term. Why not work with him like the clear majority of Americans want?"
We know why, even though Republicans won't come right out and say it. The GOP is teaching this country a "lesson". If you elect a president of color, we will sink the country before letting this president succeed. The problem is that Obama has been more successful than they could "stop".
Look at Clinton. They tried to sink him with Whitewater. But everyone understood that ex presidents get rich with speaking fees and books. And the Clinton's have made over a hundred million dollars. They didn't ever need some kickback money. How stupid do Republicans think Americans are? The short answer? Plenty stupid. They had to settle for a blowjob and still, Clinton is one of the most popular ex presidents in history.
Bush made a hundred grand as a motivational speaker and he was like 5th on the ticket. Pathetic.
Obama will make three times what Clinton made. This is why Republicans are so desperate to tie him to some kind of scandal. Once he is no longer president and free to speak out what he actually thinks, he will be MORE devastating to Republicans than Clinton.
Republicans make fun of Obama as a "community organizer" and now he has been recognized as one of the greatest "organizers" in American history. Imagine how effective he will be when he is able to do that full time.
Yet, this has moved way, way beyond just "sink Obama". I can't wait. It's going to be really something.
You say that because you know what you're talking about. Jake uses terms he doesn't understand.
Jake is all about the Proletariat and restoring power to the people so the workers can control the means of production
What a lot of slobbering by the reactionaries. The below is from a basic HS powerpoint presentation.
Some of the slobbering bloviators obviously did not get through or just slept in high schoo.
Far Right of the Spectrum Reactionary (Far Right) Advocate a return to a previous state of affairs,
often a social, political or economic order that existed earlier in history. Will use extreme measures to
achieve their goals including violence. (Fascist Dictatorships, Monarchies, Oligarchies, such as Taliban)
http://www.rocklin.k12.ca.us/staff/rspears/govt/Political Spectrum.pdf
what is interesting in looking at this chart, it clearly demostrates one thing. The left is focused on dedicating most of our resources to the segment of our society that returns the least (little to nothing) to society as a whole. When you talk about a return on investment, the poicies of the left pay no return. Is it any wonder that we're going broke?
what is interesting in looking at this chart, it clearly demostrates one thing. The left is focused on dedicating most of our resources to the segment of our society that returns the least (little to nothing) to society as a whole. When you talk about a return on investment, the poicies of the left pay no return. Is it any wonder that we're going broke?
what is interesting in looking at this chart, it clearly demostrates one thing. The left is focused on dedicating most of our resources to the segment of our society that returns the least (little to nothing) to society as a whole. When you talk about a return on investment, the poicies of the left pay no return. Is it any wonder that we're going broke?
the most interesting in this "chart" ( it's not a chart it's a student's presentation, obviously) it does not have an AUTHOR and a RESOURCE.
So you yourself can make a "chart" which will state the opposite and walk proud you've been professing the ultimate Truth
You say that because you know what you're talking about. Jake uses terms he doesn't understand.
Jake is all about the Proletariat and restoring power to the people so the workers can control the means of production
I can bet he is not the proletariat. he is a libtard earning few cents to compliment his SS.
or just a person with nothing to do and having a perverse sense of fun making people mad at him ( if he can succeed).
Does not look like serious people of the other political spectrum respect him, btw.