Queen of War Wants No Fly Zone In Syria

[Mrs. M.]

The Queen of War, Hillary Clinton, continues her blood lust for more wars with her insane plan for a no fly zone over Syria. It isn't enough that she is responsible for the bloodshed in Iraq, Libya and Syria, now she wants to declare war on Russia and kill a lot of Syrians. That's Mrs.Clinton's plans for our future, folks. Even Al Jazeera called her plan insanity and that was before she became the DNC Nominee!

The Democratic presidential frontrunner is calling for war against Russia over Syria and hoping no one notices

OPINION: Hillary Clinton’s insane plan for a no-fly zone

Last night during the third and final debate Hillary Clinton refused to tone down her war mongering rhetoric against Russia and reiterated her determination to declare a no fly zone in Syria should she become the next president of the United States. Hillary Clinton could well be the most dangerous threat to America in US history. This woman cannot be permitted anywhere near the nuclear button!

In contrast, Donald Trump calmly stated that he is against a no fly zone in Syria. Instead Mr.Trump would like to see cooler heads prevail and work to get along with the Russians rather than going to war against them.

Last week a top General agreed with Donald Trump and Al Jazeera's assessment of what a no fly zone means. General Joseph Dunford said that a no fly zone means a declaration of war against Russia and Syria.


General Joseph Dunford - Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff: For us to control all of the air space over Syria would require us to go to war against Russia and Syria. That's a pretty fundamental decision that certainly I'm not going to make.

Hillary Promises A Syria No-Fly To Save Lives, Top General Says It Would Lead To War With Russia

So Mrs. Clinton knowing full well the consequences of declaring a no fly zone in Syria as explained by a top General and Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, ignores his warning given last week and tells Chris Wallace she wants to declare a no fly zone in Syria should she become the next president.

I found it interesting that only six months ago Huffpost was reporting that the idea of a no fly zone was a very dangerous one. They also reported that Trump was ahead of Hillary Clinton in the polls. What happened? Why is the liberal media suddenly on board with Hillary Clinton's war against Russia and Syria? Hillary Clinton admitted that a no fly zone will mean killing a lot of Syrian civilians in 2013 when she was pushing for the no fly zone, now she claims it will save lives. Either way, she still wants that no fly zone in Syria:

Clinton on No-Fly Zone in 2013: ‘You’re Going to Kill a Lot of Syrians; In 2016: ‘Could Save Lives’

What she didn't mention was declaring war against Russia is going to mean killing a lot of Americans too.

What do you think about Mrs. Clinton's plan to start WWIII? Before you answer, have another look at this video of Bill's wife laughing about the death of Libyan leader, Qaddafi. Mrs. Clinton likes to remember Libya as "her war." She was also responsible for us going into Syria. Aleppo is her fault. She creates wars and then starts new ones to "save lives."



Hillary Clinton is insane. We don't need this mad woman dragging us into WWIII. We need a calm, intelligent, capable leader that will work hard to avoid WWIII and that person is Donald J. Trump.

 

[Stratford57]

Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. And that's what Obama's administration and Clinton both want to do: to add another terrorists' nest to their list.

As for Russians in Syria, I'd like to share some information, Western media prefers to remain silent about.

Putin: An exotic proposal has been made – I am going to surprise you and your audience. It has been proposed that our armed units, Russian military personnel, be deployed on the road to ensure transit safety. The Russian military, who are courageous and decisive people, have said they would do it.

But I told them that this could only be done jointly with the US, and ordered them to make the proposal. We have proposed this, and they [the Americans] promptly refused.

They do not want to deploy their troops there, but they also do not want to pull these opposition groups back, who are really terrorists. What can we do in this situation?
Answers to questions from French journalists from TF1 TV channel

Since Putin started bombing ISIS in Syria last year (Sept,30), 35 thousands of terrorists have been killed (27 hundreds of Russian and post-Soviet states citizens among them), over 12 thousand square kilometers of Syrian territory has been deliberated from terrorists (over 700 towns and villages).

 

[S.J.]

The most irresponsible position yet. And she says TRUMP should not have his fingers anywhere near the nuclear codes. If she is elected and tries to implement a no fly zone in Syria, one of two things will happen. We'll shoot down a Russian plane and they'll retaliate, or they'll shoot down one of our's. Either way, it could easily escalate into an all out war. Obama allowed Russia to push us out of Syria and there's no taking it back. The woman is clueless and has no business commanding our armed forces.

 

[Mrs. M.]

88 U.S. Generals and Admirals Endorse Donald Trump in Public Letter - Breitbart

Major General Sidney Shachnow, the only survivor of the Holocaust that became a U.S. general, and Rear Admiral Charles Williams, who received the Legion of Merit, organized the public letter.

“He has the temperament to be commander-in-chief,” stated Shachnow in a press release announcing the endorsement.

Williams suggested the letter means that military leaders believe “Donald Trump is more trusted to be commander-in-chief than Hillary Clinton.”

“Hillary Clinton has made clear she is running as a staunch defender of the status quo when it comes to the issues facing our military, and she has shown through her foreign policy decisions and her mishandling of classified information that she lacks the judgment to do the job,” Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn added in the press release. “Mr.Trump’s deep and growing support in the military community and his thoughtful proposals show he’s the right person to lead our men and women in uniform.”

 

[Bleipriester]

The Nato already have their no fly zone over Syria

The other question is what law gives a country the right to impose a "no fly zone" on another country.

 

[Bleipriester]

Obama allowed Russia to push us out of Syria and there's no taking it back.

The Coalition is illegally in Syria and Russia has been invited. The illegal Coalition was basically meant as no fly zone over ISIS but the Syrian airforce didn´t give a shit and attacked anyway.

 

[Stratford57]

Obama allowed Russia to push us out of Syria and there's no taking it back.

The Coalition is illegally in Syria and Russia has been invited. The illegal Coalition was basically meant as no fly zone over ISIS but the Syrian airforce didn´t give a shit and attacked anyway.

At the meeting last week, Mr. Kerry was trying to explain that the United States has no legal justification for attacking Mr. Assad’s government, whereas Russia was invited in by the government.

Mr. Kerry lamented being outmaneuvered by the Russians, expressed disagreement with some of Mr. Obama’s policy decisions and said Congress would never agree to use force.

At one point, Mr. Kerry astonished the Syrians at the table when he suggested that they should participate in elections that include President Bashar al-Assad, five years after President Obama demanded that he step down.

Mr. Kerry described the election saying it would be set up by Western and regional powers, and the United Nations, “under the strictest standards.”
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/100000004683024.app.html?_r=0

 

[yiostheoy]

Well Trump wants to bomb the sh!t out of Isis in Syria.

Same problem with Russia.

They are both insane.

 

[skye]

No fly zone in Syria means war with Russia. Russia doesn't want war, but that lunatic Clinton does.

Is that simple. WAR! Clinton is totally crazy and a warmonger,always has always will be.

 

[Bleipriester]

This sick "plagiator" knows that very well. He is the person who demanded nuclear strikes on his own country. Shouldn´t he be the one knowing best what a nuclear bomb does?

 

[Bleipriester]

Obama allowed Russia to push us out of Syria and there's no taking it back.

The Coalition is illegally in Syria and Russia has been invited. The illegal Coalition was basically meant as no fly zone over ISIS but the Syrian airforce didn´t give a shit and attacked anyway.

At the meeting last week, Mr. Kerry was trying to explain that the United States has no legal justification for attacking Mr. Assad’s government, whereas Russia was invited in by the government.

Mr. Kerry lamented being outmaneuvered by the Russians, expressed disagreement with some of Mr. Obama’s policy decisions and said Congress would never agree to use force.

At one point, Mr. Kerry astonished the Syrians at the table when he suggested that they should participate in elections that include President Bashar al-Assad, five years after President Obama demanded that he step down.

Mr. Kerry described the election saying it would be set up by Western and regional powers, and the United Nations, “under the strictest standards.”
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/100000004683024.app.html?_r=0

Astonishing. But the outcome would be clear: The "opposition" made up by the US would win this "election".
The US has no legal basis to strike anyone in Syria, by the way. They have no allowance of the Syrian government and no UN mandate.

 

[Stratford57]

Obama allowed Russia to push us out of Syria and there's no taking it back.

The Coalition is illegally in Syria and Russia has been invited. The illegal Coalition was basically meant as no fly zone over ISIS but the Syrian airforce didn´t give a shit and attacked anyway.

At the meeting last week, Mr. Kerry was trying to explain that the United States has no legal justification for attacking Mr. Assad’s government, whereas Russia was invited in by the government.

Mr. Kerry lamented being outmaneuvered by the Russians, expressed disagreement with some of Mr. Obama’s policy decisions and said Congress would never agree to use force.

At one point, Mr. Kerry astonished the Syrians at the table when he suggested that they should participate in elections that include President Bashar al-Assad, five years after President Obama demanded that he step down.

Mr. Kerry described the election saying it would be set up by Western and regional powers, and the United Nations, “under the strictest standards.”
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/09/30/world/middleeast/100000004683024.app.html?_r=0

Astonishing. But the outcome would be clear: The "opposition" made up by the US would win this "election".
The US has no legal basis to strike anyone in Syria, by the way. They have no allowance of the Syrian government and no UN mandate.

Putin: I reached an agreement with President Assad and he has accepted to take the road of adopting a new constitution and holding elections on the basis of this constitution. But we have not succeeded in convincing anyone else to take this road.

If the people do not vote for President Assad, there will be a democratic change of power, but without the help of armed intervention from outside and under strict international control, under UN supervision. I do not understand who could find this proposal unacceptable.

It is a democratic solution to the question of power in the country. We remain optimistic though and hope that we will finish by persuading our colleagues and partners that this is the only possible solution to the problem.
Answers to questions from French journalists from TF1 TV channel

 

[Tilly]

Lest we forget, this is what the warmonger had to say about hacking a few weeks ago, and of course she is unhealthily OBSESSED with Russia and 'Pooten', constantly blaming them with insufficient evidence for the wikileaks.
Why anyone would vote for such a warmongering loon is beyond me.

Hillary:
"As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses," she told the attendees, largely made up of veterans and their supporters."

Clinton: US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks from Russia and China

 

[JakeStarkey]

"Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. " You mean Asad will be tortured and killed, similar to Khadaffi. Good!

 

[Mrs. M.]

"Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. " You mean Asad will be tortured and killed, similar to Khadaffi. Good!

Vladimir Putin is not Muammar Gaddafi, Jake. I'd prefer that you didn't learn that lesson the hard way. If you touch Assad, Putin will respond.

As to what happened to Libya after the "no fly zone." Have you any idea of the immense suffering it has caused? Do you believe Libya is better off? NATO never kept their word. Syria shouldn't expect anything different from NATO or the UN. It's foolishness to trust the UN or NATO. Both organizations are corrupt to the core.

LIBYA After Gaddafi: The Humiliation & Horror of the ‘Failed State’…

 

[JakeStarkey]

Putin will not respond, Mrs. M., not a chance. He will huff and puff nothing more. His military is shadow of what it once was, his economy is in the dumps, and if his planes try to invade a no fly zone and attack American targets, the US will destroy every Russian warplane and ship in the Mediterranean, Adriatic, and the Black Sea. He will no more launch atomic missiles than would we.

 

[tinydancer]

"Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. " You mean Asad will be tortured and killed, similar to Khadaffi. Good!

Are you totally insane these days? Egypt, Libya and Syria were stable countries till your evil bitch of a candidate and her boss decided they needed to overthrow all the leaders and hand over those countries to maniacal Sunnis who wanted Wahhabism rule.

Clinton aka Whore of Babylon has received many donations for her work as Secretary of State to assist in these overthrows.

Whether it was the MB in Egypt who caused untold suffering for Coptic Christians and non MB Egyptians alike, or handing over Libya to terror groups and actually trying to give Syria to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood look at the bloody mess and the migrant/refugee nightmare your people have caused.

All to advance the Sunni Gulf States dream of Wahhabism.

With the death of Assad more Christians would be tortured and killed. More Christians whoever is left would be tortured and killed. Kurds would be slaughtered. As would more Yazidis.

This is what you want? Because Assad is their protector. Yet you wish for his death.

You are really screwed up these days buddy.

 

[Stratford57]

"Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. " You mean Asad will be tortured and killed, similar to Khadaffi. Good!

Vladimir Putin is not Muammar Gaddafi, Jake. I'd prefer that you didn't learn that lesson the hard way. If you touch Assad, Putin will respond.

As to what happened to Libya after the "no fly zone." Have you any idea of the immense suffering it has caused? Do you believe Libya is better off? NATO never kept their word. Syria shouldn't expect anything different from NATO or the UN. It's foolishness to trust the UN or NATO. Both organizations are corrupt to the core.

LIBYA After Gaddafi: The Humiliation & Horror of the ‘Failed State’…

"Let's not forget what happened to Libya after "no fly zone" there. Basically, that's what will happen to Syria too. " You mean Asad will be tortured and killed, similar to Khadaffi. Good!

Are you totally insane these days? Egypt, Libya and Syria were stable countries till your evil bitch of a candidate and her boss decided they needed to overthrow all the leaders and hand over those countries to maniacal Sunnis who wanted Wahhabism rule.

Clinton aka Whore of Babylon has received many donations for her work as Secretary of State to assist in these overthrows.

Whether it was the MB in Egypt who caused untold suffering for Coptic Christians and non MB Egyptians alike, or handing over Libya to terror groups and actually trying to give Syria to the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood look at the bloody mess and the migrant/refugee nightmare your people have caused.

All to advance the Sunni Gulf States dream of Wahhabism.

With the death of Assad more Christians would be tortured and killed. More Christians whoever is left would be tortured and killed. Kurds would be slaughtered. As would more Yazidis.

This is what you want? Because Assad is their protector. Yet you wish for his death.

You are really screwed up these days buddy.

Exactly five years ago, Oct 20, Libya’s ex-leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi was killed by the rebels who pinpointed him in drainage pipes after a NATO air strike hit his convoy outside his hometown of Sirte.

On the day following Gaddafi’s capture, his dead body, covered in blood, was transferred to the city of Misrata, where it was put on display in a local storage freezer.

The most striking reaction to the death of Libya’s former leader came from then-US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said “we came, we saw, he died.”
‘We came, we saw, he died’: How Gaddafi was hunted and brutally killed (TIMELINE)

I'd like to add: when all normal people are watching that last video, when Gaddafi was still alive, the blood is freezing in their veins. He has been murdered so cruelly. And Hillary just laughed... She doesn't even deserve to be called a human being. But those, who "are with her", have eyes and don't see, have ears and don't hear. Jake needs to read God's Law once in a while, may be he'll learn something for change...

 

[tinydancer]

Putin will not respond, Mrs. M., not a chance. He will huff and puff nothing more. His military is shadow of what it once was, his economy is in the dumps, and if his planes try to invade a no fly zone and attack American targets, the US will destroy every Russian warplane and ship in the Mediterranean, Adriatic, and the Black Sea. He will no more launch atomic missiles than would we.

Oh America may be #1, but #2 and #3 you see are allies. And others.

And there is no way on the planet that China, India, Iran and of course Syria would allow America to attempt to decimate Russia.

You really need to give your head a shake Jake. It won't be a one on one.

Your nuclear wild cards in all of this though is if you launch against Russia on NATO's side would be Turkey who has the largest stash of NATO nukes. That does not give me a warm and fuzzy.

On Russia's alliances the nuclear wild card would be India.

Backing Hillary it looks like you want war . Because she is a war monger.

 

[Stratford57]

At least there is somebody smart and responsible in the world:

Putin: Let us not forget that globally, we [USA and Russia] bear a special responsibility as the two largest nuclear powers for maintaining international peace and security at the global level.

Russia Calling! Investment Forum