Trump's Second Foreign Policy Crisis: Syria

Biden changed the agreement against his top generals advice.


BD.

Besides. It’s not like Trump took any advice from any generals.

And he didn’t care about the Afghan government we were supposed to be supporting.

He betrayed them, as usual, and talked directly to the Taliban.
 
BD.

Besides. It’s not like Trump took any advice from any generals.

And he didn’t care about the Afghan government we were supposed to be supporting.

He betrayed them, as usual, and talked directly to the Taliban.
Can you change the outcome of Bidens failed exit?
 
Syria is no crises. It's none of our business.
I agree with you, but it has been made our business by our masters in Tel Aviv. The recent events there have contributed in a big way to the agenda of Greater Israel.

They may rename Golan Heights to Trump Heights as they joked about during Trump's first term.
 
Can you change the outcome of Bidens failed exit?

No, but I can say with reasonable confidence that Trump would have betrayed his own commitment (ahe has a long history of doing that), and that the endless war would still be dragging on with no clear objective, but more dead.
 
Trump's first foreign policy issue is going to be Ukraine.

His second issue, which may supplant Ukraine, is Syria.

Syria is crumbling. Assad may be gone before Trump is sworn in.

As the primary rebel force, Hyat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), has been enjoying recent success, other factional rebel groups have been cropping up like weeds.

The latest rebel group calls itself the Southern Operations Room.

Putin has abandoned Assad due to his preoccupation with the war in Ukraine.

Iran is also abandoning Syria as they are distracted by Israel.

1500 to 2000 Syrian troops have turned tail and entered Iraq.

Hezbollah has entered Syria to stem the tide of Syrian rebels who are now close enough to be a threat to Tripoli in northern Lebanon.

Once Assad falls, all of these rebel organizations are going to be fighting each other to fill the power vacuum, and we can be sure there will be vicious recriminations against anyone connected to the Assad regime.

HTS is the dominant rebel organization, but none of the factions can be considered anything close to moderate.

It's going to be a bloody mess, and Trump is going to have to get up to speed quickly.

SOMETHING to watch before making judgments.
 
Trump's first foreign policy issue is going to be Ukraine.

His second issue, which may supplant Ukraine, is Syria.

Syria is crumbling. Assad may be gone before Trump is sworn in.

As the primary rebel force, Hyat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), has been enjoying recent success, other factional rebel groups have been cropping up like weeds.

The latest rebel group calls itself the Southern Operations Room.

Putin has abandoned Assad due to his preoccupation with the war in Ukraine.

Iran is also abandoning Syria as they are distracted by Israel.

1500 to 2000 Syrian troops have turned tail and entered Iraq.

Hezbollah has entered Syria to stem the tide of Syrian rebels who are now close enough to be a threat to Tripoli in northern Lebanon.

Once Assad falls, all of these rebel organizations are going to be fighting each other to fill the power vacuum, and we can be sure there will be vicious recriminations against anyone connected to the Assad regime.

HTS is the dominant rebel organization, but none of the factions can be considered anything close to moderate.

It's going to be a bloody mess, and Trump is going to have to get up to speed quickly.

Well it is our business if we consider Israel and Iran our business. Not to mention our little foray into Iraq and the kurds' territory.
Not that I'm for unilateral invasions of countries that pose no threat to bombs in the US
 
No, but I can say with reasonable confidence that Trump would have betrayed his own commitment (ahe has a long history of doing that), and that the endless war would still be dragging on with no clear objective, but more dead.
Tell me about Trump's long history of betrayal.
 
Back
Top Bottom