daws101
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
Nothing to defend .Translation : I'm getting my ass handed to me.Hey asshole you need to learn the difference between stating a fact and making a claim .Not claiming anything just starting fact.
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Interesting reply.
You deny "claiming" what I ask you about.
Then claim that if anyone states the opposite of what you are NOT claiming, that they are "chickenshit" and "false".
So you DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLAIM that Kelly was NOT biased, because then you would have to defend that, and you can't.
BUT you do want ridicule and disagree with anyone who says she WAS biased.
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
A claim is an opinion.
Stating a fact is not .
Megan Kelly's "treatment of the Donald is well within the rights of journalism.
Btw your fall back statement is false and Doa
"rights of journalism"?
WTF is that bullshit?
She was supposed to be an MODERATOR.
Instead she took sides.
She failed in her professional duties.
That Fox wanted to put her in charge again was them taking sides and trying to rig the game against Trump.
He refused to bend over and be their bitch and told them to fuck off.
GOOD FOR HIM!
Your dishonest semantics games is of no interest to me. Save them for some one who cares.
You could have defended your claim that her previous behavior was indeed, within the "rights of journalism" and not a professional failure.
Instead you make a vague claim of winning this debate.
LIberals: All the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Another thing you need to learn is the meaning of the word vague
Again the argument goes back to your inability to think in non literal terms.