HenryBHough
Diamond Member
That noise you'll hear five minutes into the "debate" will be the sound of 20,000,000 TV sets changing channels when Trump isn't there. You might want to turn off your hearing aids.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your response just proves you take everything literally.Not in the literal sense .his gargantuan ego did that.At least the MSM isn't picking your candidate for you this time....oh wait
WTF are you even TRYING to say?
You seriously are not claiming that Trump was picked for the GOP by the MSM?
WTF?
THat made no sense what so ever.
Candycorn just obtusely implied that the Mainstream liberal Media are the ones who are pushing Trump as the GOP candidate.
That is absolutely insane on her part.
And your response is "not literally"?
Damn you're ignorant.
Not claiming anything just starting fact.False! A moderator has lots of leeway in what's fair and what's not .Show or no show the Donald has proven by this cowardice , what a diva he is .
If he hasn't got the balls to take some flack from the media ( btw, that's their job) he can't be trusted to lead.
The job of a MODERATOR in a debate is NOT to give flak to a specific candidate that she doesn't like.
Definition of MODERATORNote the lack of any "taking sides" or "giving flak".
- 1: one who arbitrates : mediator
- 2: one who presides over an assembly, meeting, or discussion: asa : the presiding officer of a Presbyterian governing bodyb : the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meetingc : the chairman of a discussion group
That's in no way taking sides .
Everything about the candidates that might effect their credibility is fair game.
Not being able to stag manage everything is the Donald's greatest fear.
That's a fatal flaw.
Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
Dodge!Your response just proves you take everything literally.Not in the literal sense .his gargantuan ego did that.At least the MSM isn't picking your candidate for you this time....oh wait
WTF are you even TRYING to say?
You seriously are not claiming that Trump was picked for the GOP by the MSM?
WTF?
THat made no sense what so ever.
Candycorn just obtusely implied that the Mainstream liberal Media are the ones who are pushing Trump as the GOP candidate.
That is absolutely insane on her part.
And your response is "not literally"?
Damn you're ignorant.
What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
He all but guarantees Trump will be on the debate stage. He's a Cruz Operative so a grain of salt is in order
Not claiming anything just starting fact.False! A moderator has lots of leeway in what's fair and what's not .Show or no show the Donald has proven by this cowardice , what a diva he is .
If he hasn't got the balls to take some flack from the media ( btw, that's their job) he can't be trusted to lead.
The job of a MODERATOR in a debate is NOT to give flak to a specific candidate that she doesn't like.
Definition of MODERATORNote the lack of any "taking sides" or "giving flak".
- 1: one who arbitrates : mediator
- 2: one who presides over an assembly, meeting, or discussion: asa : the presiding officer of a Presbyterian governing bodyb : the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meetingc : the chairman of a discussion group
That's in no way taking sides .
Everything about the candidates that might effect their credibility is fair game.
Not being able to stag manage everything is the Donald's greatest fear.
That's a fatal flaw.
Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Dodge!Your response just proves you take everything literally.Not in the literal sense .his gargantuan ego did that.WTF are you even TRYING to say?
You seriously are not claiming that Trump was picked for the GOP by the MSM?
WTF?
THat made no sense what so ever.
Candycorn just obtusely implied that the Mainstream liberal Media are the ones who are pushing Trump as the GOP candidate.
That is absolutely insane on her part.
And your response is "not literally"?
Damn you're ignorant.
What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
Hey asshole you need to learn the difference between stating a fact and making a claim .Not claiming anything just starting fact.False! A moderator has lots of leeway in what's fair and what's not .Show or no show the Donald has proven by this cowardice , what a diva he is .
If he hasn't got the balls to take some flack from the media ( btw, that's their job) he can't be trusted to lead.
The job of a MODERATOR in a debate is NOT to give flak to a specific candidate that she doesn't like.
Definition of MODERATORNote the lack of any "taking sides" or "giving flak".
- 1: one who arbitrates : mediator
- 2: one who presides over an assembly, meeting, or discussion: asa : the presiding officer of a Presbyterian governing bodyb : the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meetingc : the chairman of a discussion group
That's in no way taking sides .
Everything about the candidates that might effect their credibility is fair game.
Not being able to stag manage everything is the Donald's greatest fear.
That's a fatal flaw.
Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Interesting reply.
You deny "claiming" what I ask you about.
Then claim that if anyone states the opposite of what you are NOT claiming, that they are "chickenshit" and "false".
So you DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLAIM that Kelly was NOT biased, because then you would have to defend that, and you can't.
BUT you do want ridicule and disagree with anyone who says she WAS biased.
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
I posted dodge because that's what you did .Dodge!Your response just proves you take everything literally.Not in the literal sense .his gargantuan ego did that.
WTF?
THat made no sense what so ever.
Candycorn just obtusely implied that the Mainstream liberal Media are the ones who are pushing Trump as the GOP candidate.
That is absolutely insane on her part.
And your response is "not literally"?
Damn you're ignorant.
What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
Hey asshole you need to learn the difference between stating a fact and making a claim .Not claiming anything just starting fact.False! A moderator has lots of leeway in what's fair and what's not .The job of a MODERATOR in a debate is NOT to give flak to a specific candidate that she doesn't like.
Definition of MODERATORNote the lack of any "taking sides" or "giving flak".
That's in no way taking sides .
Everything about the candidates that might effect their credibility is fair game.
Not being able to stag manage everything is the Donald's greatest fear.
That's a fatal flaw.
Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Interesting reply.
You deny "claiming" what I ask you about.
Then claim that if anyone states the opposite of what you are NOT claiming, that they are "chickenshit" and "false".
So you DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLAIM that Kelly was NOT biased, because then you would have to defend that, and you can't.
BUT you do want ridicule and disagree with anyone who says she WAS biased.
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
A claim is an opinion.
Stating a fact is not .
Megan Kelly's "treatment of the Donald is well within the rights of journalism.
Btw your fall back statement is false and Doa
I posted dodge because that's what you did .Dodge!Your response just proves you take everything literally.WTF?
THat made no sense what so ever.
Candycorn just obtusely implied that the Mainstream liberal Media are the ones who are pushing Trump as the GOP candidate.
That is absolutely insane on her part.
And your response is "not literally"?
Damn you're ignorant.
What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
If what you missed has to be explained to you, you haven't got the chops to understand it anyway.
However it does elegantly prove my point about you taking everything literally. Damn.
It was unnecessary for me to prove anything as its obvious.I posted dodge because that's what you did .Dodge!Your response just proves you take everything literally.
Damn you're ignorant.
What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
If what you missed has to be explained to you, you haven't got the chops to understand it anyway.
However it does elegantly prove my point about you taking everything literally. Damn.
If you were able to give this supposed "figurative" point that candycorn was trying to make, that would have demonstrated that I indeed missed something.
And I went straight into that, I specifically asked you to prove that there was a point that I missed.
That is the exact opposite of a "Dodge".
I also predicted that you would NOT give me the "figurative" point, because there was none.
I stated instead that you would spew bullshit.
Which you have done.
Liberals: all the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
It was unnecessary for me to prove anything as its obvious.I posted dodge because that's what you did .Dodge!What "figurative" point was Candcorn supposedly trying to make that I supposedly missed?
Rhetorical question. THere isn't one, and you'll just spew moronic nonsense.
I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
If what you missed has to be explained to you, you haven't got the chops to understand it anyway.
However it does elegantly prove my point about you taking everything literally. Damn.
If you were able to give this supposed "figurative" point that candycorn was trying to make, that would have demonstrated that I indeed missed something.
And I went straight into that, I specifically asked you to prove that there was a point that I missed.
That is the exact opposite of a "Dodge".
I also predicted that you would NOT give me the "figurative" point, because there was none.
I stated instead that you would spew bullshit.
Which you have done.
Liberals: all the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
Translation : I'm getting my ass handed to me.Hey asshole you need to learn the difference between stating a fact and making a claim .Not claiming anything just starting fact.False! A moderator has lots of leeway in what's fair and what's not .
That's in no way taking sides .
Everything about the candidates that might effect their credibility is fair game.
Not being able to stag manage everything is the Donald's greatest fear.
That's a fatal flaw.
Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Interesting reply.
You deny "claiming" what I ask you about.
Then claim that if anyone states the opposite of what you are NOT claiming, that they are "chickenshit" and "false".
So you DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLAIM that Kelly was NOT biased, because then you would have to defend that, and you can't.
BUT you do want ridicule and disagree with anyone who says she WAS biased.
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
A claim is an opinion.
Stating a fact is not .
Megan Kelly's "treatment of the Donald is well within the rights of journalism.
Btw your fall back statement is false and Doa
"rights of journalism"?
WTF is that bullshit?
She was supposed to be an MODERATOR.
Instead she took sides.
She failed in her professional duties.
That Fox wanted to put her in charge again was them taking sides and trying to rig the game against Trump.
He refused to bend over and be their bitch and told them to fuck off.
GOOD FOR HIM!
Your dishonest semantics games is of no interest to me. Save them for some one who cares.
Nothing to dodge,It was unnecessary for me to prove anything as its obvious.I posted dodge because that's what you did .Dodge!
I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
If what you missed has to be explained to you, you haven't got the chops to understand it anyway.
However it does elegantly prove my point about you taking everything literally. Damn.
If you were able to give this supposed "figurative" point that candycorn was trying to make, that would have demonstrated that I indeed missed something.
And I went straight into that, I specifically asked you to prove that there was a point that I missed.
That is the exact opposite of a "Dodge".
I also predicted that you would NOT give me the "figurative" point, because there was none.
I stated instead that you would spew bullshit.
Which you have done.
Liberals: all the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
And you keep dodging.
LIberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.
Translation : I'm getting my ass handed to me.Hey asshole you need to learn the difference between stating a fact and making a claim .Not claiming anything just starting fact.Are you claiming that Kelly was NOT biased against Trump in the first debate?
To say she was is chicken shit and false.
Interesting reply.
You deny "claiming" what I ask you about.
Then claim that if anyone states the opposite of what you are NOT claiming, that they are "chickenshit" and "false".
So you DON'T WANT TO MAKE THE CLAIM that Kelly was NOT biased, because then you would have to defend that, and you can't.
BUT you do want ridicule and disagree with anyone who says she WAS biased.
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
A claim is an opinion.
Stating a fact is not .
Megan Kelly's "treatment of the Donald is well within the rights of journalism.
Btw your fall back statement is false and Doa
"rights of journalism"?
WTF is that bullshit?
She was supposed to be an MODERATOR.
Instead she took sides.
She failed in her professional duties.
That Fox wanted to put her in charge again was them taking sides and trying to rig the game against Trump.
He refused to bend over and be their bitch and told them to fuck off.
GOOD FOR HIM!
Your dishonest semantics games is of no interest to me. Save them for some one who cares.
Nothing to dodge,It was unnecessary for me to prove anything as its obvious.I posted dodge because that's what you did .I straight out ask you what the point was I supposedly missed.
AND predicted that you would not have an answer because there was no point that I missed.
And you post "dodge".
Liberals. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
If what you missed has to be explained to you, you haven't got the chops to understand it anyway.
However it does elegantly prove my point about you taking everything literally. Damn.
If you were able to give this supposed "figurative" point that candycorn was trying to make, that would have demonstrated that I indeed missed something.
And I went straight into that, I specifically asked you to prove that there was a point that I missed.
That is the exact opposite of a "Dodge".
I also predicted that you would NOT give me the "figurative" point, because there was none.
I stated instead that you would spew bullshit.
Which you have done.
Liberals: all the intellectual honestly of a crack whore.
And you keep dodging.
LIberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.
Oh no not the zero self awareness ploy again!