- Nov 8, 2014
- Reaction score
No I'm being fair and objective, not a Leftie hack like you. I’m saying Baldwin wasn't really at fault, except that he stupidly pointed the weapon at the woman without knowing. There might be enough to charge the person who armed the weapon with involuntary manslaughter. But most likely the family will get tons of money in civil court, as in the OJ trial.
How was he not at fault? He pointed a gun at someone and pulled the trigger. Whose fault was it?