I had more knowledge of firearms before I was ten then you have now, moron. You don't know anything about me. I have never had a bad experience with a firearm and I own more than you've probably ever seen. I don't need a scattergun to hit what I am shooting at either. Run along you ignorant POS.
You need to stop crying over Baldwin and get a life. You like to flatter yourself, but all you're doing is adding the prick to the scrotum.
Got anymore irrelevant, infantile, small-minded insults to toss around to cover for your lack of intelligence and ineptitude? You are as bad as globalists--the problem will go away if we don't enforce existing firearms regulations, eh? I am sure you believe that firearms confiscation is the answer. Now would you like to return to the topic or throw some more school yard insults.
Back to the topic, stop crying over Baldwin, the court's decision is made, and as you read down the thread, speculation is not evidence. And yet another case/problem that involves a gun, surprise surprise.
And I have never expected any other outcome in a democrat state with a rich, white, leftist celebrity. The entire case has been a comedy of errors. The fact remains that the laws are not being enforced and he'll be whining for gun confiscation again as soon as he regains his soapbox.
Well, bit different in the UK because in the USA most things have to get labelled Left Wing or Right Wing etc.. As for guns, you regulate cars and exhausts on motorbikes (I read the Harley thread) and champion regulations and prosecutions, but apply the same common sense to guns....... (I know I know, Rights crap this Rights crap that)....blurt out Rights to deflect from common sense.
You are a walking talking contradiction. On one hand you abhor regulations while on the other you champion them. All the while you eschew accountability for disregarding regulations. SMH. So you're going to remove someone's right to own a firearm while doing nothing to the scofflaw that ignores the law.
Further proof that the right tried to make the case about partisan politics, not facts or the law.
It is more than a political view with Alex Baldwin. SNL alone proves it. Propagandist shill.
Are you from canada Slow? [please say yes]
"helped"? as in the woman would still be alive "helped"?
You also heard "the judge likes Baldwin vids", if you didn't just hear those voices in your head then you should be able to cite their source, if you can't then your claim is obviously and undeniably projection.
The ballad of white liberals
The judge had a different opinion.
You saw? Oh well, if you saw nothing. From your superior vantage point, it's settled. The judge disagrees with you and dismissed two cases.
