Progressive Democrat congressman proposes bill that establishes life begins at conception

Typical non-response from the crowd that lets other people do their thinking for them. You're swinging way above your league here, kid, and failing miserably.
So you don't understand statistics? Not to worry most people don't.
 
So God, by allowing all those zygotes that never attach to a womb to die, designed an immoral system?
A simple mind might come to that conclusion.
So you don't understand statistics? Not to worry most people don't.
Oh, and you copy/pasting a link is proof you do? Lol.
I understand that you're flailing about in a childish effort to avoid the thread topic, which is a dem basically admitting that human life begins at conception.
 
Last edited:
To the useful idiots on the left, viability means being able to survive without assistance. If that is the bar set for being able to kill a human, liberals would all be dead by now.
What science they can’t answer is how does the human grow?

well thinking about that, if the woman kills what isn’t attached, she’s killing another human it’s viable because it’s growing!
 
Last edited:
Dumbass, there are many cells that are human, and alive, and can even reporduce.

You are making a special pleading to legally treat some specific types as persons.
No, useful idiot, I'm claiming a fertilized human ovum is a human being in the first stages of an individual life. You are trotting out the tired old meme of saying you're killing human life when you cut your toenails or ejaculate. Fuck off, imbecile.
 
No, useful idiot, I'm claiming a fertilized human ovum is a human being in the first stages of an individual life. You are trotting out the tired old meme of saying you're killing human life when you cut your toenails or ejaculate. Fuck off, imbecile.
It’s a fingernail not human. A human ovum is a being with fingernails coming
 
Dumbass, there are many cells that are human, and alive, and can even reproduce.

You are making a special pleading to legally treat some specific types as persons.

The science isn't on your side here. Life, including human life, has a specific scientific definition - it begins at conception. This isn't debated anywhere that I'm aware of. Are you?
 
Rep Bennett unintentionally opened a Pandora’s box with that bill. Instead of holding fathers accountable for their actions post conception, he ended up handing ammunition to the pro-life movement.
 
Rep Bennett unintentionally opened a Pandora’s box with that bill. Instead of holding fathers accountable for their actions post conception, he ended up handing ammunition to the pro-life movement.
They pretend it is. Does't the wording make the sperm donor liable for half the abortion costs if the mother chooses to have one?
 
Well said. That scientific fact is why pro-aborts have to rely on believing in some sort of magic that arbitrarily turns what they refer to as a "clump of cells" into a human being at whatever time they decide is most advantageous. It's a very strange, quasi-religious argument that has thankfully been rendered null by modern science.
It does sometimes seem like they believe in the lawyer fairy, who sprinkles magic lawyer dust on a new-born after the mother formally submits her agreement that she wants the baby. The dust apparently does something to the baby's DNA that turns it into a human being, and without it the baby can safely be killed violently with repercussions. What the child is before that they can't seem to explain, they're just sure it's not a human.
 

Forum List

Back
Top