Progressive Democrat congressman proposes bill that establishes life begins at conception

There is no black and white here. If the egg is fertilized it's a child, if you abort it you're killing it.
Correct, and the only response from libtards is semantics, not science.
 
Typical non-response from the crowd that lets other people do their thinking for them. You're swinging way above your league here, kid, and failing miserably.
 
It’s human? Help me understand what viability means
To the useful idiots on the left, viability means being able to survive without assistance. If that is the bar set for being able to kill a human, liberals would all be dead by now.
 
To the useful idiots on the left, viability means being able to survive without assistance.
By that definition Zygote is not viable.

Without a host to attach to, it dies.
 
Oh? Because I thought first stanges of development was to produce a sperm and egg and just because they may get to dance at some point does not make them, or the resulting cells more worthy of personal right guarantees by our laws.
You can have your legal opinions, kid. That doesn't change the science of a new human life beginning at conception.
 
By that definition Zygote is not viable.

Without a host to attach to, it dies.
It's a human being in the initial stages of life. All your other weasel words are irrelevant diversions and cowardly justifications for ending a human life.
 
It's a human being in the initial stages of life. All your other weasel words are irrelevant diversions.
What exactly is "being"? It's just a word you use to make yourself feel a certain way.

We are talking about but a few cells that have zero capacity to think or feel or anything else we can relate to human experience.

If you want to interfere in people's lives and force them to have children they don't want, you really ought to have a much better thought out reasoning.
 
Last edited:
Does killing any human cell both immoral and illegal?
That question doesn't make sense to people who speak English, kid.
Stop embarrassing yourself by parroting the silly, uneducated questions you've been fed by your political party.
 
Correct, and the only response from libtards is semantics, not science.
They are the same group that thinks someone with a prostate is a woman and someone without a prostate is a man! Science ain’t their thing
 
Words have meaning, dolts.

And it's the meaning that we explain with them.
 
Back
Top Bottom