Progressive Democrat congressman proposes bill that establishes life begins at conception

It’s human? Help me understand what viability means
To the useful idiots on the left, viability means being able to survive without assistance. If that is the bar set for being able to kill a human, liberals would all be dead by now.
 
Oh? Because I thought first stanges of development was to produce a sperm and egg and just because they may get to dance at some point does not make them, or the resulting cells more worthy of personal right guarantees by our laws.
You can have your legal opinions, kid. That doesn't change the science of a new human life beginning at conception.
 
By that definition Zygote is not viable.

Without a host to attach to, it dies.
It's a human being in the initial stages of life. All your other weasel words are irrelevant diversions and cowardly justifications for ending a human life.
 
It's a human being in the initial stages of life. All your other weasel words are irrelevant diversions.
What exactly is "being"? It's just a word you use to make yourself feel a certain way.

We are talking about but a few cells that have zero capacity to think or feel or anything else we can relate to human experience.

If you want to interfere in people's lives and force them to have children they don't want, you really ought to have a much better thought out reasoning.
 
Last edited:
Correct, and the only response from libtards is semantics, not science.
They are the same group that thinks someone with a prostate is a woman and someone without a prostate is a man! Science ain’t their thing
 
Words have meaning, dolts.

And it's the meaning that we explain with them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top