Progressive Democrat congressman proposes bill that establishes life begins at conception

[Orangecat]

e we're talking about your fellow DemoKKKrat accepting the scientific fact that life, and parental responsibility for that life, begins at conception,

These clowns are certainly doing their best to divert.
"Viability", "personhood", "death penalty", "10 fetuses in a burning building". Waaaaahhhhhh!!!1!1

 

[jc456]

Everyone who reads this, their life began at conception.

Not every zygote develops into a viable human being.

Still human

 

[Resnic]

I say this not from a political or religious aspect, but life does start at conception. I say that from purely a scientific stance.

Soon as sperm impregnates the egg it is a human life if you leave it alone to grow. It doesn't magically turn into a child at a later time, it's always a child, just at a different stage is all and if you abort it you're intentionally killing a child.

There is no black and white here. If the egg is fertilized it's a child, if you abort it you're killing it.

 

[BlindBoo]

Who decides it's 50/50, not 49/51? Second opinion, anyone? Lulz.

Statistical Analysis - What is it?

Statistical analysis isn’t just for sports geeks and political pollsters. Learn how statistics effect your world.

www.sas.com

 

[marvin martian]

I say this not from a political or religious aspect, but life does start at conception. I say that from purely a scientific stance.

Soon as sperm impregnates the egg it is a human life if you leave it alone to grow. It doesn't magically turn into a child at a later time, it's always a child, just at a different stage is all and if you abort it you're intentionally killing a child.

There is no black and white here. If the egg is fertilized it's a child, if you abort it you're killing it.

Well said. That scientific fact is why pro-aborts have to rely on believing in some sort of magic that arbitrarily turns what they refer to as a "clump of cells" into a human being at whatever time they decide is most advantageous. It's a very strange, quasi-religious argument that has thankfully been rendered null by modern science.

 

[BlindBoo]

Still human

So it's human? Why does that make a difference? Do you think it would be a different species?

 

[Donald H]

So you also disagree with the congressman's bill?

Marvin sit!
SIT!

 

[jc456]

So it's human? Why does that make a difference? Do you think it would be a different species?

It’s human? Help me understand what viability means

 

[AntonToo]

You only say that to avoid the fact that it is a human being in the first stages of development. "Personhood" means nothing, because there is no scientific definition of that silly, amorphous term.

Oh? Because I thought first stanges of development was to produce a sperm and egg and just because they may get to dance at some point does not make them, or the resulting cells more worthy of personal right guarantees by our laws.

 

[jc456]

Oh? Because I thought first stanges of developement was to produce sperm and egg.

Nope, they must meet and engage, conception!

 

[BlindBoo]

Soon as sperm impregnates the egg it is a human life if you leave it alone to grow.

Nah, if left alone that zygote dies. Many zygote do. They must attach to the womb of the mother to grow into a viable baby. Many simply don't do that and get flush out with the next cycle. Still it is the unique DNA of a human and the mothers baby factory is sort of made to accept the little sucker.......

 

[marvin martian]

Marvin sit!
SIT!

Why are you dodging such a simple question, Donald H?

Do you support the congressman's bill or not?

 

[eagle1462010]

Election year. They after voters. Its all a lie. After the election it will change.

 

[marvin martian]

Oh? Because I thought first stanges of developement was to produce a sperm and egg and just because they may get to dance at some point does not make them, or the resulting cells more worthy of personal rights guarantees by our laws.

The level of scientific ignorance on the left is shocking.

 

[Jets]

Rep Bennett did a volte-face:

 

[AntonToo]

The level of scientific ignorance on the left is shocking.

Like what? And I do hope you make it specific to the comment you quoted.

 

[jc456]

Nah, if left alone that zygote dies. Many zygote do. They must attach to the womb of the mother to grow into a viable baby. Many simply don't do that and get flush out with the next cycle. Still it is the unique DNA of a human and the mothers baby factory is sort of made to accept the little sucker.......

How does it grow then?

 

[jc456]

Like what? And I do hope you make it specific to the comment you quoted.

Unattainable to them

 

[hadit]

No, if you hire a hitman -- just because the hit man did the murder -- doesn't mean the person that hired that hitman gets off scot-free

So....the woman who goes to a doctor to solicit an abortion is just as guilty as the doctor...

Now...shouldn't she be put to death???

And Scot Peterson didn't check with his wife to see if she wanted her child aborted before he murdered both of them.....

Again, whenever I ask you fake morality morons this question -- you always hem and haw instead of answering the question

Interesting. They're a "fetus", then they're a "child" when it's convenient. Why keep changing?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Not every zygote develops into a viable human being.

So true.

I mean, you were a zygote once, and look how you turned out.