Article 15
Dr. House slayer
- Jul 4, 2008
- 24,673
- 4,916
- 183
It's about busting up the unions to hamstring your political opposition.
Like I said nobody is forcing the unions to support one candidate over another.
And furthermore, nobody is forcing those people to take these jobs.
You're damn right it's about busting them up and it should be. They're parasites on every taxpaying citizen in the state.
I don't give 20 ounces of rat shit about who the unions decide to support. I don't want my tax dollars going to fund the political campaigns of politicians PERIOD! And as I pointed out in my previous response, the vast majority of the time that money is going to the Democrats, and you know that. And no, the unions members don't have a choice to support whoever they want. They have to go with what the majority decides and they are forced to hand their money over regardless. Unions abandon individualism for collectivism.
You're right. They don't have to take the job, but then extortion shouldn't have to be part of the agreement in order to take the job. What ever happened to freedom of choice?
Stop making excuses for corruption and kickbacks. FDR opposed the public sector unionizing for precisely this reason. It's a conflict of interest and it's shady ethics all the way around.
If a job involves taking compulsory dues then it's on you to take it or not. There is your choice.
You always have the option to take the job and try to change it from within but I don't see a bunch of union workers in Wisconsin thanking the governor for this awesome freedom of choice he dishonestly tried to force upon them that you speak of.