C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Unsurprisingly, this turns out to be false.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Republicans know Trumpism has hurt them, and most of them hated being under constant threat of Trump's Wrath if they didn't walk his line.
Trump's speech was "mexico isnt sending their best", which establishes that mexico is sending their people, their rapists, their criminals.
Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if
(1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,
and
(2) is likely to incite or produce such action
This was established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, which created a legal standard called "imminent lawless action"
Really ?Unsurprisingly, this turns out to be false.
Trump's speech was "mexico isnt sending their best", which establishes that mexico is sending their people, their rapists, their criminals.
Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if
(1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,
and
(2) is likely to incite or produce such action
This was established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, which created a legal standard called "imminent lawless action"
That's the point. His speech didn't incite anything but protests. It's the morons in the protest that decided to riot on their own. Trump had nothing to do with that. It's all a leftist lie. Maybe you can call Alan Dershowitz and debate him on the matter, because even he said the language used by Trump does not meet the legal standard of inciting violence. Words mean things. It's not up to leftists to decide what somebody meant like they did in the first phony impeachment, and expect that their interpretation be held as Gospel.
Trump did not incite violence. This is inciting violence.
You are strongly hinting at what a fucking Trump-hating imbecile you are.He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen.
He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen.
You are 39% of Republicans, which is a good chunk, that are Trumpets, but the other 60% would give her a shot.Because Republicans know Trumpism has hurt them, and most of them hated being under constant threat of Trump's Wrath if they didn't walk his line.
There are TDS Republicans like Cheney, but the smart ones see where their constituency is heading. Look for her to be primaried out next election. Trump had support of the Republican constituency to beat Hillary, and he gained 12 million more against Creepy Joe. If the Republicans want to go against us, it would mean the end of the party, and they know it.
You can stop Trump (for now) but you're not going to stop us.
Trump's speech was "mexico isnt sending their best", which establishes that mexico is sending their people, their rapists, their criminals.
Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if
(1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,
and
(2) is likely to incite or produce such action
This was established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, which created a legal standard called "imminent lawless action"
That's the point. His speech didn't incite anything but protests. It's the morons in the protest that decided to riot on their own. Trump had nothing to do with that. It's all a leftist lie. Maybe you can call Alan Dershowitz and debate him on the matter, because even he said the language used by Trump does not meet the legal standard of inciting violence. Words mean things. It's not up to leftists to decide what somebody meant like they did in the first phony impeachment, and expect that their interpretation be held as Gospel.
Trump did not incite violence. This is inciting violence.
He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen.
Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?
Donald Trump was accused of inciting violence that left five people dead. So what did the president say?www.bbc.com
Trump's speech was "mexico isnt sending their best", which establishes that mexico is sending their people, their rapists, their criminals.
Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if
(1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,
and
(2) is likely to incite or produce such action
This was established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, which created a legal standard called "imminent lawless action"
That's the point. His speech didn't incite anything but protests. It's the morons in the protest that decided to riot on their own. Trump had nothing to do with that. It's all a leftist lie. Maybe you can call Alan Dershowitz and debate him on the matter, because even he said the language used by Trump does not meet the legal standard of inciting violence. Words mean things. It's not up to leftists to decide what somebody meant like they did in the first phony impeachment, and expect that their interpretation be held as Gospel.
Trump did not incite violence. This is inciting violence.
He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen.
Capitol riots: Did Trump's words at rally incite violence?
Donald Trump was accused of inciting violence that left five people dead. So what did the president say?www.bbc.com
I don't care for this impeachment business, I'm more interested in getting my congressman Andy Biggs out of office.
You are 39% of Republicans, which is a good chunk, that are Trumpets, but the other 60% would give her a shot.
Is America and your life any better due to Trump? Did you get all that you wanted for yourself and our Nation as you planned?
I do predict she will be Speaker some day if Republicans ever get the House....before she takes a shot at being a Senator...
I don't agree with her politically, on anything, but I can spot an up and coming leader....
At 2:50 in the General says Special Forces entered the Capital Building along with Antifa and grabbed Pelosi's laptop, so the corrupt, incompetent, traitorous POS Pelosi is freaking out.
Apparently Rod Rosenstein had DEA agents hire 2 MS13 gang members to do the hit on Rich, supposed to be a mugging, it went bad and Rich was killed. The MS13 gang members fucked up so they were killed by government agents, allegedly.
There was nothing racist about Trump
Trump never once used the word riot in his speech.
Mitch is not going to proceed with a hearing on a fake impeachment before the 20th and rightfully so. When you conspire with Communists, that makes you a Communist yourself.
He didn't have to. He ranted at them for hours about how they needed to march on Congress to get them to throw out an election result.
So what? If anything, the longer Trump delays, the worse it will be for him.
The idea is not to throw him out, it's to make sure he never runs again, and loses all the prestige we allot to former presidents, because he doesn't deserve them.
Well correct, that's why they are doing it. It's the way Communists work. So they held an impeachment with no lawyers, no trial, no impeachable offense, and once again, no crimes committed. So why are these un-Americans doing all this? Fear, plain and simple.
This time next week, Trump will be a civilian again. It's my hope he sues Nazi Piglosi for more money than she ever had for the violations against his constitutional rights.
yeah, I'm sure it will go as well as any of his other lawsuits...
Of course, when DeutschBank is thru with him, he won't have a pot to piss in.
Come on now. We all know how vindictive Trump can be with his enemies. Government taking legal action against another American for exercising his constitutional rights is a violation of his rights. I think part of the settlement should be Piglosi have to step down as Speaker.
Wow, this is like your fantasies about how Trump was going to win the election, aren't they?
The fact is, five minutes after he takes that last ride on Marine One, the GOP is going to cut ties with him so fast it won't even be funny.