Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is the next phase of the theft. The robbery itself and now the campaign to normalize and insist thisIt's not over until it's over.
Their party masters have issued the talking points they are ordered to repeat as nauseum.This is the next phase of the theft. The robbery itself and now the campaign to normalize and insist thisIt's not over until it's over.
crime legitimizes Cognitively Deficient Joe in office.
It's Stalinist/Alinskyite trash.
After the Democrats screamed for four years about Russian collusion affecting the election????Isn't this what the left did 4 years ago when losing?You are the one who are dreaming you think that the Conservatives should remain quiet and accept the hold up without flinching?only in your wet dreams...
real conservatives already spoke...
look at the numbers, they either already voted for biden or accepted trumps historic defeat...
it is only bunch of brain dead lunatics trying to undermine the country because they got butt hurt...
Not in the fucking slightest. There were tears, disappointment, even screaming at the sky. And then four years of endless memes from you jokers rubbing that in our faces. But no Democrat questioned the legitimacy of the election, or claimed that the election was “rigged”, or went to court to claim ballots shouldn’t be counted, or claiming widespread fraud with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
Are you saying the Democrats knew the election was legitimate, and they spent four years blowing smoke up our asses????
Stop with this claim. The whole Russian argument came out AFTER the inauguration. Again, post one quote from a Democrat that was claiming in the run up and the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election that it was “rigged”, or “fraudulent”, quote a line from any Democrat claiming that votes shouldn’t be counted or counting should stop. Honestly, your boy lost. Accept it with some dignity. Go out and scream at the sky if it makes you feel better.
Rudy is on fire gathering the evidence. Fake News is on attack right now on him. This is a great press conference, and should be more till middle of December.
Rudy is on fire gathering the evidence. Fake News is on attack right now on him. This is a great press conference, and should be more till middle of December.
Rudy is going to be super lucky if he isn't in the legal crosshairs come January 21st.
Rudy is on fire gathering the evidence. Fake News is on attack right now on him. This is a great press conference, and should be more till middle of December.
Rudy is going to be super lucky if he isn't in the legal crosshairs come January 21st.
Already getting insecure about Rudy helping President Trump fight this case I see. You do know he's a lawyer right?
Already getting insecure about Rudy helping President Trump fight this case I see. You do know he's a lawyer right?
The 2020 Presidential election may hinge on a USSC decision to enforce PA election law as prescribed by the PA legislature, and not the PA Supreme Court.
An opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."
Supreme Court allows extended mail-in ballot deadline in Pennsylvania
If the vote totals on Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania are close enough that ballots received after Election Day could impact the state’s results, legal challenges over the ballots could prolong final election results.www.thedp.com
The USSC decision may come down to the number of votes received after election day, if that number could affect the outcome.
Stay tuned, the PA election is not decided, and won't be for a while yet.
Trump should gain from the "provisional ballot" count, and would gain even more if the USSC disqualifies late votes.
Actually, it's possible that Trump could also pull ahead in Pennsylvania (and some other states) if he can prove to the SCOTUS that some of the Democrats' antics (which he has proof of) have made it impossible to validate the votes from some precincts in the Democrat strongholds (and is irreversible)....The 2020 Presidential election may hinge on a USSC decision to enforce PA election law as prescribed by the PA legislature, and not the PA Supreme Court.
An opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."Supreme Court allows extended mail-in ballot deadline in Pennsylvania
If the vote totals on Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania are close enough that ballots received after Election Day could impact the state’s results, legal challenges over the ballots could prolong final election results.
The USSC decision may come down to the number of votes received after election day, if that number could affect the outcome.
Stay tuned, the PA election is not decided, and won't be for a while yet.
Trump should gain from the "provisional ballot" count, and would gain even more if the USSC disqualifies late votes.
If the Democrats are unable to validate the votes, none of the votes from those precincts can be counted, and all of them must be thrown out....
The 2020 Presidential election may hinge on a USSC decision to enforce PA election law as prescribed by the PA legislature, and not the PA Supreme Court.
An opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."Supreme Court allows extended mail-in ballot deadline in Pennsylvania
If the vote totals on Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania are close enough that ballots received after Election Day could impact the state’s results, legal challenges over the ballots could prolong final election results.
The USSC decision may come down to the number of votes received after election day, if that number could affect the outcome.
Stay tuned, the PA election is not decided, and won't be for a while yet.
Trump should gain from the "provisional ballot" count, and would gain even more if the USSC disqualifies late votes.
Have any of you heard how many of the mail-in-ballots in PA were received after the polls closed?
kyzr's thread didn't age well:The 2020 Presidential election may hinge on a USSC decision to enforce PA election law as prescribed by the PA legislature, and not the PA Supreme Court.
An opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."Supreme Court allows extended mail-in ballot deadline in Pennsylvania
If the vote totals on Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania are close enough that ballots received after Election Day could impact the state’s results, legal challenges over the ballots could prolong final election results.
The USSC decision may come down to the number of votes received after election day, if that number could affect the outcome.
Stay tuned, the PA election is not decided, and won't be for a while yet.
Trump should gain from the "provisional ballot" count, and would gain even more if the USSC disqualifies late votes.
www.cnn.com
Yep.kyzr's thread didn't age well:The 2020 Presidential election may hinge on a USSC decision to enforce PA election law as prescribed by the PA legislature, and not the PA Supreme Court.
An opinion accompanying the Supreme Court’s order by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, suggested that the court may still revisit the case after the election and toss out contested mail-in ballots. Although the Supreme Court declined to rule on the matter before the election, Alito wrote that there was a "strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."Supreme Court allows extended mail-in ballot deadline in Pennsylvania
If the vote totals on Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania are close enough that ballots received after Election Day could impact the state’s results, legal challenges over the ballots could prolong final election results.
The USSC decision may come down to the number of votes received after election day, if that number could affect the outcome.
Stay tuned, the PA election is not decided, and won't be for a while yet.
Trump should gain from the "provisional ballot" count, and would gain even more if the USSC disqualifies late votes.
Supreme Court rejects Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to block Biden victory
The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied a request from Pennsylvania Republicans to block certification of the commonwealth's election results, delivering a near fatal blow to the GOP's long-shot bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden's victory.
