OMG !
Get a grip and sober up.
Depends where the tanker is hit and size of warhead on the torpedo.
If it homes in on sounds of propeller and has a small warhead, it likely only disables the tanker not sinks it.
Ships the Brits loss were the topic I was suggesting. That's you deflection.
Back to point of my post to which your garbled reply;
The
Argentine cruiser
ARA General Belgrano was sunk on May 2, 1982, by the British
nuclear submarine HMS Conqueror during the
Falklands War. The sinking led to the death of 323 Argentine sailors, almost half of all Argentine casualties during the conflict, and sparked controversy, as the attack occurred outside the exclusion zone established by the
British government around the islands. In the UK, some commentators have suggested that the action may have been motivated by political considerations, such as undermining peace talks or bolstering Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher's popularity among the British public. In Argentina, some critics have characterized the sinking of the cruiser as a contentious act, with some even suggesting it could constitute a
war crime, though this interpretation is debated and has not been legally substantiated. Some analyses argue that, from a military perspective, the sinking contributed to British naval superiority, which may have influenced the outcome of the conflict. However, this perspective remains part of broader debates about the strategic and ethical implications of the event.
The sinking of the
General Belgrano was the first case of a
warship being torpedoed and sunk in action by a nuclear submarine, and one of only
four cases of a warship being sunk by any type of submarine since the end of the
Second World War.
...
en.wikipedia.org
