Doesn't mean the torps can't be used against surface targets.
Dire Straits? Great band!
OMG !
Get a grip and sober up.
Depends where the tanker is hit and size of warhead on the torpedo. If it homes in on sounds of propeller and has a small warhead, it likely only disables the tanker not sinks it.
Ships the Brits loss were the topic I was suggesting. That's you deflection.
Back to point of my post to which your garbled reply;
The Argentine cruiser ARA General Belgrano was sunk on May 2, 1982, by the British nuclear submarine HMS Conqueror during the Falklands War. The sinking led to the death of 323 Argentine sailors, almost half of all Argentine casualties during the conflict, and sparked controversy, as the attack occurred outside the exclusion zone established by the British government around the islands. In the UK, some commentators have suggested that the action may have been motivated by political considerations, such as undermining peace talks or bolstering Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's popularity among the British public. In Argentina, some critics have characterized the sinking of the cruiser as a contentious act, with some even suggesting it could constitute a war crime, though this interpretation is debated and has not been legally substantiated. Some analyses argue that, from a military perspective, the sinking contributed to British naval superiority, which may have influenced the outcome of the conflict. However, this perspective remains part of broader debates about the strategic and ethical implications of the event.
The sinking of the General Belgrano was the first case of a warship being torpedoed and sunk in action by a nuclear submarine, and one of only four cases of a warship being sunk by any type of submarine since the end of the Second World War.
...
Sinking of ARA General Belgrano - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
There's a word for people like you--Hypocrite.
I don't excuse any of it so how am i a hypocrite?
Clean your own house before pointing fingers, hypocrite.
I can't change British history what the hell are you ranting about?
But you can change your interpretation and application of British/UK history.
Wire-guided means they could be guided towards a vessel's props/rudder in override of other targeting~guidance systems.
You have no idea what level of control they have, do you? That ship is likely moving when you attack it.Wire-guided means they could be guided towards a vessel's props/rudder in override of other targeting~guidance systems.
No, assmunch. Not like those under the Shah. But those days were vastly better for most Iranians. You ignorant ****.
You aren't John Wayne, nor an admiral, but you are full of bilge.
They didn't have a nuclear weapon program according to 274 IAEA inspectors, who told you they did? and try telling the thousands of dead and tortured Iranians they were better off, but that isn't the point you dumb bastard, the point is you didn't have any right to launch a unprovoked attack on Iran bombing cities and killing civilians because those Zionist gangsters told Trump to do it, the Iranians should make it their priority to kill Nuttenyahu if he is still alive and his criminal cohorts.
I have already told you i have been a critic of many parts of our History i don't just defend that history no matter what unlike many of you Americans who see any criticism of your history or Country as a personal insult, that is irrational.But you can change your interpretation and application of British/UK history.
You cannot even disagree with me because you are so ignorant. All you have is manufactured insults. Pitiful if you ask me.
